Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 875-882, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-942985

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare clinical characteristics of sporadic gastrinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-related gastrinoma. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with clinical manifestations of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, pathological diagnosis as neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) and complete clinical and follow-up data were enrolled. Patients with only high gastric acid secretion but without evidence of NEN, or with other concurrent non-NEN tumors were excluded. According to the above criteria, the clinicopathological data of 52 cases of gastrinoma diagnosed from April 2003 to December 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, were collected. Patients who met the diagnostic criteria of gastrinoma and met one of the following conditions were diagnosed as MEN1-related gastrinoma: (1) the presence of pathogenic mutations in the MEN1 gene confirmed by genetic testing; (2) NENs involving two or more endocrine glands, namely, pituitary, parathyroid, thymic, pancreatic, and adrenal NENs; (3) NEN and at least one first-degree relatives diagnosed as MEN1. The remaining gastrinomas were defined as sporadic gastrinoma. Student's t test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic findings, imaging characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of sporadic and MEN1-related gastrinoma were compared. Results: Among 52 patients with gastrinoma, 33 were sporadic gastrinoma and 19 were MEN1-related gastrinoma. The common symptoms of both sporadic and MEN1-related gastrinomas were diarrhea (24/33, 72.7%; 17/19, 89.5%) and abdominal pain (19/33, 57.6%; 9/19, 47.4%). Compared with sporadic gastrinoma, MEN1-related gastrinoma needed longer time for diagnosis [(7.4±4.9) years vs. (3.9±5.2) years, t=-2.355, P=0.022), were more likely multiple tumors [47.4% (9/19) vs. 15.2% (5/33), χ(2)=6.361, P=0.012], had smaller diameter [(1.7±1.0) cm vs. (3.1±1.8) cm, t=2.942, P=0.005), presented the lower tumor grade [G1: 83.3% (15/18) vs. 39.4% (13/33); G2: 11.1% (2/18) vs. 54.5% (18/33); G3: 5.6% (1/18) vs. 6.1% (2/33), Z=-2.766, P=0.006], were less likely to have serum gastrin which was 10 times higher than normal [11.8% (2/17) vs. 56.0% (14/33), χ(2)=8.396, P=0.004], had higher probability of complication with type 2 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (g-NET) [31.6% (6/19) vs. 3.0%(1/33), χ(2)=6.163, P=0.013], and had lower rate of liver metastasis [21.1% (4/19) vs. 51.5% (17/33), χ(2)=4.648, P=0.031). There was no obvious difference between sporadic gastrinomas and MEN1-related gastrinomas in endoscopic findings. Both types presented enlarged and swollen gastric mucosa under the stimulation of high gastric acid, and multiple ulcers in the stomach and duodenum could be seen. Gastrinoma with type 2 g-NET presented multiple polypoid raised lesions in the fundus and body of the stomach. (68)Ga-SSR-PET/CT scan had a 100% detection rate for both types while (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scan had a higher detection rate for sporadic gastrinoma compared with MEN1-related gastrinoma [57.9% (11/19) vs. 20.0% (3/15), χ(2)=4.970, P=0.026]. Among the patients with sporadic gastrinoma, 19 received surgical treatment, 1 underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, 8 underwent transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), and 5 underwent surgery combined with TAE. Among patients with MEN1-related gastrinoma, 13 received surgical treatment, and the other 6 received conservative treatment. The median follow-up of all the patients was 21.5 (1-129) months, and the 5-year survival rate was 88.4%. The 5-year survival rate of patients with sporadic and MEN1-related gastrinomas was 89.5% and 80.0% respectively (P=0.949). The 5-year survival rate of patients with and without liver metastasis was 76.2% vs. 100%, respectively (P=0.061). Conclusions: Compared with sporadic gastrinoma, MEN1-related gastrinoma has longer diagnosis delay, smaller tumor diameter, lower tumor grading, lower risk of liver metastasis, and is more likely to complicate with type 2 g-NET, while there is no difference in survival between the two tumor types.


Subject(s)
Humans , Gastrinoma/genetics , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective Studies
2.
São Paulo; s.n; 2010. [189] p. ilus.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-587492

ABSTRACT

A acromegalia é doença insidiosa e desfigurante caracterizada por um crescimento desproporcional dos ossos das mãos, pés e do crânio devido à exposição crônica a altos níveis de hormônio de crescimento (GH) e de seu efetor insuline growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Trata-se de uma doença rara, com incidência estimada de 3-4 casos por milhão, com prevalência de aproximadamente 50 casos por milhão de pessoas. A principal causa da acromegalia é a presença de um tumor hipofisário secretor de GH (somatotropinoma). Caso o somatotropinoma ocorra durante a infância ou adolescência, antes do fechamento das epífises dos ossos longos, a criança crescerá longitudinalmente de forma descontrolada, caracterizando a forma clínica gigantismo. Na grande maioria dos casos a acromegalia se apresenta na forma esporádica, entretanto casos familiais da doença podem ocorrer associados à Neoplasia Endócrina Múltipla tipo 1 (NEM-1), ao complexo de Carney (CNC) e à acromegalia familial isolada (IFS). Os genes responsáveis pela NEM-1 (MEN1) e CNC (PRKAR1A) foram clonados há mais 10 anos, entretanto etiologia molecular da IFS permaneceu desconhecida até recentemente. Vierimaa et al. (2006) combinaram estudos de ligação por análise de polimorfismos e estudos de expressão gênica e identificaram mutações no gene AIP em famílias com acromegalia não-NEM-1 e não-CNC; além de perda de heterozigose (LOH) nos somatotropinomas dos pacientes com mutação AIP. No presente estudo, investigamos o gene AIP em três famílias brasileiras com IFS e em seus tumores (hipofisários e não-hipofisários). Descrevemos uma nova mutação AIP (Y268X) em uma família brasileira com IFS, confirmando o papel desse novo gene na predisposição a tumores hipofisários. A partir de dados gerados em uma extensa revisão da literatura, sugerimos que os tumores hipofisários familiais isolados são doenças multigênicas que possuiriam um gene principal, mas que sofreriam influência de outros genes/loci ainda pouco caracterizados...


Acromegaly is a rare disfigurating and insidious disease characterized by enlargement of hands, feet and skull bones due to excess of growth hormone (GH) secreted by a pituitary tumor (somatotropinoma). The majority of the cases with acromegaly is sporadic, however it may occur in association with inherited disorders as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), Carney complex (CNC) and Isolated Familial Somatotropinoma (IFS). The genes associated with MEN1 syndrome (MEN1) and CNC (PRKAR1A) have been described more than a decade ago, however until very recently the molecular etiology of IFS remained unknown. Using a combined strategy of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and gene expression analysis, Vierimaa et al. (2006) described mutations in the AIP gene occurring in families with acromegaly not associated with MEN1 and CNC. In the current study, we investigated three Brazilian families with IFS and were able to describe two germline mutations in the AIP gene, confirming the role of this new gene in the predisposition to familial somatotropinoma. We revised the literature of genetic studies of isolated pituitary adenoma syndromes, which indicated a genetic heterogeneity as well as possible multigenic inheritance for these diseases. Thus, we investigated the role of several genes/loci (SSTR2, SSTR5, CDKN1B, AHR, PRKAR1A, PTTG, PROP1, MEG3, RB1 and 2p16) selected as potentially acting as phenotypic modulators in IFS. Our data indicate that AIP-mutated patients are prone to pituitary disease, however it is necessary the co-segregation of markers located at oncogenic regions to the development of the pituitary tumors and manifestation of the disease. Herein, we also present the first somatic analysis of non-pituitary tumors of AIP-mutated patients. A potential role of AIP, which is implicated in the cAMP pathway, could not be excluded in the development of an adrenocortical carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Acromegaly/genetics , Cyclic AMP , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma , Loss of Heterozygosity , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia/genetics
3.
Journal of Korean Society of Endocrinology ; : 71-77, 2005.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-21278

ABSTRACT

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1(MEN 1) is an autosomal dominantly inherited syndrome, characterized by the combined occurrence of tumors of the parathyroid glands, endocrine pancreas, and anterior pituitary gland. The MENIN gene, which is a kind of tumor suppressor gene, is located at the chromosomal locus 11q13. It consists of one untranslated exon and nine exons encoding the menin protein. We report a case of a 22-yearss-old woman with MEN type 1, who was proven to have a mutation in the MENIN gene. The patient was admitted because of repeated hypoglycemia. The fasting plasma glucose level was 32mg/dL. Seventy two hours fasting test showed an the insulin/glucose ratio as 0.33. Endoscopic ultrasonography detected multiple masses on the pancreas. The arterial -stimulated venous sampling(ASVS) with calcium showed sudden step up of insulin at the head and tail portions of the pancreas. The sellar MRI showed a pituitary mass that produced prolactin. Instead of a pathologic diagnosis from operational specimen, the genetic analysis revealed a mutation in the MENIN 1 gene(exon 2, 200~201insAGCCC).


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Blood Glucose , Calcium , Diagnosis , Endosonography , Exons , Fasting , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Head , Hyperparathyroidism , Hypoglycemia , Insulin , Insulinoma , Islets of Langerhans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia , Pancreas , Parathyroid Glands , Pituitary Gland, Anterior , Prolactin , Prolactinoma
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL