Differential Analysis of Macular Structure and Microcirculation in Both Eyes of Patients With Myopic Anisometropia / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To compare the macular structure and microcirculation in both eyes of the patients with myopic anisometropia.Methods Optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)was employed to scan the macular areas in both eyes of 44 patients with myopic anisometropia.The patients were assigned into high and low groups based on the refractive diopter,and the parameters such as retinal thickness,choroidal thickness,vascular density,and perfusion density in the macular areas of both eyes were compared between the two groups.Results Other macular areas except the central and external nasal areas and the choroid of the fovea in the high group were thinner than those in the low group(all P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in retinal vascular density or perfusion density in different areas between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion In the patients with myopic anisometropia,most areas of the retina in the case of high myopia is thinner than that in the case of low myopia,while there is no difference in retinal vascular density or perfusion density in both eyes.

Comparison of the efficacy in adolescents with myopic anisometropia corrected by spectacles versus orthokeratology / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM:To observe the near stereoscopic visual function of adolescents with different degrees of myopic anisometropia after being corrected by spectacles and orthokeratology.METHODS:In this prospective clinical research,220 patients aged 10-20 years old with myopic anisometropia were recruited between March 2017 and December 2018. All the patients were divided into four groups according to the difference of cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive(SER)error between the two eyes: group of 76 cases without anisometropia(SER error difference less than 1.00D), group of 60 cases with mild anisometropia(SER error difference of 1.00-<1.75D), group of 51 cases with moderate anisometropia(SER error difference of 2.00-<2.75D), and group of 33 cases with severe anisometropia(SER error difference of 3.00D or more). With regards the different optical correction approaches for myopia, 88 cases were categorized into the orthokeratology group and 132 cases into the spectacle group, the stereoacuity values at 3mo after correction were compared between the orthokeratology group and the spectacle group to see whether statistically significant difference existed.RESULTS:In the group of spectacle correction, there was significant statistical difference existed between the four sub-groups for the near stereoscopic visual function(<i>P</i><0.001). In the group of orthokeratology correction, there was no statistical difference existed between the four sub-groups for the near stereoscopic visual function(<i>P</i>=0.765). In both non-anisometropia and mild anisometropia groups, there was no statistical difference between the orthokeratology correction and spectacle correction sub-groups for the near stereoacuity values(<i>P</i>=0.109,<i>P</i>=0.052). However, in the moderate and severe anisometropia groups, orthokeratology group had better near stereoscopic vision than spectacle group(<i>P</i><0.001).CONCLUSION: Adolescents with myopic anisometropia corrected by orthokeratology lens were better at near stereoscopic visual function than corrected by spectacles, especially in the moderate and severe anisometropia groups.

Clinical Features of Amblyopic Children with Myopic Anisometropia at a Tertiary Center

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features of unilateral amblyopia with myopic anisometropia at a tertiary center. METHODS: The medical records of 102 children wearing spectacles due to myopic anisometropia with an interocular difference in spherical equivalent (SE) ≥ 1.00 diopters (D) with a follow-up ≥ 1 year were reviewed. Patients were classified into mild or severe groups according to an interocular SE difference ≥ 3.00D. The frequency of amblyopia (interocular difference ≥ two lines of visual acuity [VA]) and response to patching, the magnitude of anisometropia, and the frequency of combined ocular or systemic disorders except refractive errors were compared between the two groups. The VA and refractive errors were measured four months and one year after spectacle correction and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: In all, 61 patients with mild myopic anisometropia and 41 patients with severe myopic anisometropia started to wear spectacles at a mean age of 5.2 years old and were followed-up during a mean period of 34.6 months. The frequency of amblyopia decreased more prominently in the mild group: 82.0% in the mild group vs. 92.7% in the severe group four months after spectacle correction and 45.9% in the mild group vs. 87.8% in the severe group at the last follow-up. At baseline, the mild group had anisometropia of 1.42 ± 0.66D, while the severe group had anisometropia of 5.47 ± 2.09D. The magnitude of anisometropia tended to increase by 0.42D but not significantly: +0.78D in the mild group and −0.02D in the severe group. More than half of the patients had combined disorders: 57.4% in the mild group and 53.7% in the severe group. CONCLUSIONS: Severe myopic anisometropic amblyopia at a tertiary center showed little improvement and the magnitude of anisometropia did not change.

A Longitudinal Change of Spherical Equivalent in Anisometropic Children

PURPOSE: To demonstrate longitudinal refractive changes of anisometropia children. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients (or children) with anisometropia ≥ 1 diopters (D) for 5 years who visited our hospital between January 2013 and December 2014 with patients having annual refraction test data from 5-years-old to 10-years-old. RESULTS: A total of 37 children satisfied the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one children had hyperopic anisometropia and 16 children had myopic anisometropia. All hyperopic anisometropia and 12 myopic anisometropia children who had unilateral amblyopia were treated with occlusion therapy. The mean anisometropia at 5 years of age was 3.02 D and in the 37 children, the final degree of anisometropia was not significantly different between the 5-year-old and 10-year-old patients. In the high anisometropia and low anisometropia groups and in the myopia and hyperopia groups, the final degree of anisometropia was not significantly different at 5 years of age versus 10 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with anisometropia, spherical equivalent values did not show a significant difference when comparing 5-year-old versus 10-year-old patients and changes in the spherical equivalent values of eyes from both groups progressed to the same degree even if there was anisometropia in myopic and hyperopic patients.