ABSTRACT
A 15-month retrospective study of 1,000 outpatients was conducted to determine the exact cause of general dizziness. The most common diagnosis in all analyzed cases was cervicogenic general dizziness (89%). The majority of the patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine had narrow spinal canals. Measuring the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal in each case was critical to obtain an accurate diagnosis in line with the diagnostic criteria used. General dizziness may develop because of inappropriate neck posture over long periods of time in individuals with some form of underlying cervical disease. The causes of general dizziness were different between male and female patients and between patients of different age groups. Triggers leading to general dizziness included engaging in farming, gardening, or weeding activities for long periods of time, particularly in elderly women. Selection of the appropriate muscle relaxant type and dosage is important in the treatment of patients with cervicogenic general dizziness who also experience a stiff neck and shoulders. Following treatment, 90% of patients no longer experienced general dizziness or exhibited clear improvements in their symptoms within 1 week. The results of this study emphasize the importance of cervicogenic general dizziness, which is due to cervical vertebral lesions and is exacerbated by excessive stress on the cervical spine.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and necessity of combined anterior approach (discectomy and fusion) and posterior approach(open-door laminoplasty) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: The authors reviewed 14 cases in whom combined anterior and posterior approach performed for cervical myelopathy due to simultaneous anterior and posterior pathology such as huge central disc herniation with narrow spinal canal between January 2000 and December 2002. Clinical symptoms were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and then the cervical curvature, change of spinal canal to vertebral body(SC/VB) ratio and canal widening were measured and compared to the clinical symptoms. RESULTS: The mean JOA score increased from 10.4+/-3.1 preoperatively to 14.8+/-1.2 at the final follow up with a mean recovery rate 66.4%. In all cases, there were not neurologic deterioration. Mild postoperative complications developed in two cases. One patient had a limitation of range of neck motion and the other one showed kyphotic change. Postoperative radiography showed an improvement of body to canal ratios (average 0.70+/-0.08 before surgery to 1.05+/-0.12 after surgery) and mainte nance or recovery of cervical lordosis. Canal widening of antero-posterior diameter and dimension after operation is 6.8 mm, 116.61 mm2. CONCLUSION: Combined anterior and posterior procedure could be helpful in decompression of the spinal cord and good functional recovery in spondylotic myelopathy patients with combined anterior and posterior pathology such as huge disc herniation accompanying narrow spinal canal.