ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the success rate and influencing factors of auscultation-assisted bedside blind placement of the spiral nasojejunal feeding tube in oldest-old patients.Methods:A case series study was conducted in those elderly hospitalized patients who met the indications for naso intestinal intubation from January 2019 to May 2021 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Auscultation-assisted bedside blind placement of the spiral nasojejunal feeding tube was implemented. In addition, abdominal X-ray imaging was performed to confirm the location of the catheter tip. The primary indicators included were the success rate and the first attempt success rate of nasojejunal tube placement;, while the secondary indicators included were the number of attempts and the time of insertion. The rate of operational-related adverse events was ustreated as to evaluate the indicator of safety. Logistic regression analysis was used to conduct multi factor analysis.Results:The total success rate and the first-attempt success rate of tube implantation reached were 90.1%(73/81) and 85.2%(69/81), respectively. The mean attempt per individual patient was (1.2 ± 0.2) times for each patient. The median length of operation time was 40.0(27.0, 45.0) minutes, more specifically, among which the median length time of nasogastric and gastrojejunal placement was 20.0(15.0, 25.0) and 18.0(12.5, 20.0) minutes, respectively; while the median lengthtime of nasogastric placement was greaterhigher than that of gastrojejunal placement ( Z = -2.78, P<0.05). As suggested by multivariate analysis, indicated that the conscious conditions of patients had a signific antlyimpact affect on the success rate of for tube implantation ( OR = 19.25, 95% CI 1.24-299.63, P<0.05). In addition, the incidence rate of operational-related adverse events was 37.0%(30/81). By contrast, there were no serious adverse events occurring during the study period. Conclusions:The auscultation-assisted bedside blind placement of the nasojejunal feeding tube technique is effective and safe for early nutrition support in oldest-old patients in terms of early nutritionsupport, the success rate of which is significant largely affected by the patients′ conscious conditions of patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the application value of bedside nasojejunal feeding tube placement using four steps of ultrasonic-assisted method in critical ill patients. Method: Thirty-three critical ill patients receiving enteral nutrition were enrolled. We adopt four steps of ultrasonic guidance to conduct nasojejunal feeding tube placement. The details were as followed: nasojejunal feeding tube placement within the esophagus, within Gastric body, within After the pylorus, at last the location of nasojejunal feeding tube. Results: The placement of nasojejunal feeding tube was successful in 28 patients, failed in 2 patients. The failure reason include that the false appearance of pylorus through and the lost gastrointestinal motility led to the sticking of nasojejunal feeding tube on arcus major ventriculi and it couldn't enter into gastric antrum and pylorus. Conclusion: The application of nasojejunal feeding tube placement by four steps of ultrasonic-assisted is a novel feeding technique, and it's simple, effective, noninvasive and repeatability procedure with a high success rate and low complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application effect of nasojejunal feeding tube nutrition in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to the Department of Surgical Critical Care Medicine,the Third Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yatsen University between June 2012 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into either a nasojejunal feeding tube nutrition support group (nasojejunal group,n = 26)or an asogastric feeding tube nutrition support group (asogastric group,n = 28)according to the different ways of enteral nutrition. All patients began to receive nasal feeding whole protein preparations (enteral nutritional emulsion,TPF-D)from the second day after admission to intensive care unit (ICU). The time to reach the enteral nutrition support target,the time of parenteral nutritional support,nutritional index (albumin and hemoglobin),the time admission to ICU,and the incidences of infection and gastrointestinal complications in both groups were observed. Results (1)According to the body weight to calculate calorie demand, the nasojejunal group reaching the time of enteral nutrition support target was faster than that of the asogastric group (3. 0 ± 0. 8 d vs. 7. 7 ± 2. 5 d). There was significant difference between the 2 groups (P 0. 05). Conclusion Nasojejunal feeding tube nutrition support may be faster to achieve the target of enteral nutrition supports and shorten the time in ICU.
ABSTRACT
Objective To solve the difficulty of intubation of nasojejunal feeding tube under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) system when conventional methods were failed.Methods Seventy-one patients who failed to place the nasojejunal feeding tube by single guide wire under DSA conventional methods.With the methods of decreasing the stomach volume,changing the body posi-tion,and using a catheter or gastrointestinal motility,the nasojejunal feeding tube was placed into the proper position (more than 30cm far away from Treitz or gastrointestinal anastomosis).Results All the procedures were successfully accomplished.No compli-cations,such as throat damage,abdominal pain,perforation and hemorrhage of digestive tract were found.The mean duration under DSA was four minutes (2-7min).Conclusion With the help of various methods above,we can improve the success rate of intuba-tion and reduce the duration of the nasojejunal feeding tube placement,when conventional methods were failed.
ABSTRACT
Objectives:To improve the surgical procedures and investigate the feasibility of the closed placement of nasojejunal tube during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Methods:From January 2010 to December 2013, 85 patients (72 males and 13 females) with esophageal or gastric cardiac carcinoma underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our department. Briefly, the general surgical proce-dures were performed as follows:1) stomach mobilization and enlargement of esophageal hiatus and pyloric sphincter digital fracture via laparotomy; 2) tubular stomach reconstruction, esophageal carcinoma resection, and intra-thoracic esophagogatrostomy via right posterolateral thoracotomy;and 3) forward closed placement of feeding tube through the nostrils and jejunum of patients under the guid-ance of a surgeon, who palpates the pylorus through the hiatus with the use of fingers. Results:No operative death or feeding tube-asso-ciated adverse event was observed. Among the 85 patients who have undergone Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, feeding tube placement in-to the jejunum during surgery failed in 33 cases. The success rate of nasojejunal feeding tube placement was 61.2%(52/85). Twelve pa-tients with successful tube placement did not receive enteral feeding for several reasons and were thereby transferred to parenteral group. Significant differences were observed in terms of the nutritional cost and proportion between enteral feeding and parenteral groups (?1,469 ± 741 vs.?3,223 ± 917, P0.05). Conclusion:The novel forward closed placement of nasojejunal feeding tube dur-ing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy provides a non-invasive, feasible, simple, and economical method for postoperative nutritional support. Surgeons could perform this novel technique successfully in practice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Early enteral nutrition (EEN) has benefits in reducing infectious complication, length of stay (LOS) and preserving liver function. There are few data about the effect of EEN in the patients who had total gastrectomy. The aim of this randomized and prospective study was to evaluate the effect of EEN after total gastrectomy on nutritional status, liver function, complications and LOS, compared to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Among 56 patients with gastric cancer, 36 and 20 were randomly assigned to EEN and TPN groups, and finally 17 and 16 completed EEN and TPN schedules, respectively. The nutritional parameters, liver function, LOS and abdominal symptoms were compared between 2 groups on pre-operative day and post-operative 7th day. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the nutritional parameters, liver function between EEN and TPN groups. Vomiting and abdominal distention were more frequent in EEN than TPN group (2 vs. 0 cases, p=0.485; 1 vs. 0 case, p=1.000, respectively), while increased AST, ALT and total bilirubin were more common in TPN than EEN group (4 vs. 2 cases, p=0.398; 1 vs. 0 case, p=0.485, respectively without statistical significance). LOS was shorter in EEN than TPN group without statistical significance (12 vs. 13 days, p=0.289). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in the nutritional status parameters, liver function, complications and LOS between EEN and TPN groups on 7th day after total gastrectomy. Further large scale studies on the advantages and disadvantages of EEN after total gastrectomy are warranted.