Nationwide Systems for Nosocomial Infections Surveillance in the Countries Other than Korea / 병원감염관리

Nosocomial infections surveillance is the basic activity of infection control programs, and many countries conduct surveillance using various methods. We convinced that each country should conduct an adequate and efficient surveillance system depending on their situations. Here we reviewed the recent nosocomial surveillance systems of other countries. As many countries have succeeded in reducing hospital infections, we expect that Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System would contribute to nosocomial infection prevention and health promotion in Korea through an active surveillance at the national level.

Antimicrobial Resistance of Clinically Important Bacteria Isolated from 12 Hospitals in Korea in 2005 and 2006 / 대한임상미생물학회지

BACKGROUND: Emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant bacteria make it difficult to treat infections. A rapid increase in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria has become a serious problem in many countries including Korea, and it is important to perform a nationwide study of antimicrobial resistance to obtain some basic data that will help solve these problems. The aim of this study was to determine the nationwide prevalence of resistance among frequently isolated bacterial pathogens in 2005 and 2006 in Korea. METHODS: We collected routine susceptibility data for medically important bacterial pathogens from 12 university and general hospital laboratories in Korea from April to September in 2005 and from January to June in 2006. Collected data was analyzed by patient group. RESULTS: The proportions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were 65% in 2005 and 72% in 2006, respectively. The resistance rates of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin were 29% in 2005 and 24% in 2006. The non-susceptible rates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin were 68% in 2005 and 74% in 2006. The resistant rates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to the 3rd generation cephalosporin were 10~12% and 25~39%, respectively, in 2005 and 11~15% and 30~34% in 2006. In Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae and Serratia marcescens, the resistance rates to 3rd generation cephalosporin were 23~31%, 32~34%, and 17~27%, respectively, in 2005 and 21~37%, 37~43%, and 13~31% in 2006. The resistance rates to imipenem and meropenem were 21% and 18%, respectively, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 18% and 25% in Acinetobacter baumannii in 2005; 29% and 20% in P. aeruginosa and 18% and 23% in A. baumannii in 2006. Cotrimoxazole and levofloxacin resistance rates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were 5% and 13%, respectively, in 2005 and 3% and 7% in 2006. There were no isolates resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone among non-typhoidal Salmonella in 2005. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial resistance of medically important bacteria is still a serious problem in Korea. To manage the problem, a continuous nationwide surveillance and diversified investigation and effort have become more important.

Antimicrobial Resistance of Clinically Important Bacteria Isolated from 12 Hospitals in Korea in 2004 / 대한임상미생물학회지

BACKGROUND: A rapid increase in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria has become a serious problem in many countries including Korea, but the rate and pattern of antimicrobial resistance may vary significantly depending on countries and even on hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine the nationwide prevalence of resistance among frequently isolated bacterial pathogens in Korea. METHODS: Routine susceptibility data for medically important bacterial pathogens from 12 university hospital and general hospital laboratories in Korea were analysed by patient group. These pathogens had been isolated during the period from April to November in 2004. RESULTS: The proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 67%. Van-comycin-resistance rate of Enterococcus faecalis was 1% and that of E.faecium was 20%. The resistance rates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin and Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin were 70% and 54%, respectively. The resistant rates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were 7-10% and 26-31% to the 3rd generation cephalosporin, respectively. The resistance rates to 3rd generation cephalosporin were 22-30% in Citrobacter freundii, 35-44% in Enterobacter cloacae and 15-22 % in Serratia marcescens. Imipenem resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were 26% and 17%. Cotrimoxazole and levofloxacin resistance rates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were 46% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial resistance rates of clinically important pathogens in Korea were still high and were generally higher among the bacteria isolated from the intensive care unit patients. Strict infection control and continuous nationwide surveillance program will be required to manage the antimicrobial resistance problem.

The Accuracy of ICD codes for Cerebrovascular Diseases in Medical Insurance Claims / 예방의학회지

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to assess the accuracy of ICD codes for cerebrovascular diseases in medical insurance claims (ICMIC) and to investigate the reasons for error. This study was designed as a preliminary study to establish a nationwide surveillance system. METHODS: A total of 626 patients with medical insurance claims who indicated a diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases during the period from 1993 to 1997 was selected from the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation cohort (KMIC cohort: 115,600 persons). The KMIC cohort was 10% of those insured who had taken health examinations in 1990 and 1992 consecutively. The registered medical record administrators were trained in the survey technique and gathered data from March to May 1999. The definition of cerebrovascular diseases in this study included cases which met one of two criteria (Minnesota, WHO) or 'definite stroke' in CT/MRI finding. We questioned the medical record administrators to explain the error if the final diagnoses were not coded as stroke. RESULTS: The accuracy rate of the ICMIC was 83.0% (425 cases). Medical records were not available for 8.2% (51 cases) due to the closing of hospitals, the absence of a computer system or omission of medical record, etc. Sixty-three cases (10.0%) were classified as impossible to interpret due to insufficient records in 'major clinical symptoms' or 'neurological deficits'. The most common reason was 'to meet review criteria of medical insurance benefits (52.9%)'. The department where errors in the ICMIC occurred most frequently was the department for medical insurance claims in the hospital. CONCLUSION: The accuracy rate of the ICMIC was 83.0%.