Recurrent Intraocular Pressure Elevation during Hemodialysis in a Patient with Neovascular Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To report a patient with symptomatic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in an eye with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) during hemodialysis. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: Recurrent episodes of severe ocular pain and elevated IOP in the NVG eye were noted during hemodialysis in a 29-year-old man. The patient was recently diagnosed at our ophthalmology clinic with NVG due to central retinal vein occlusion. IOP was temporarily controlled after the Ahmed valve implantation. However, after the fibrous membrane developed and occluded the tip of the Ahmed valve, IOP elevation during hemodialysis recurred. Further treatments with intravenous mannitol, oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, topical antiglaumatic agents and subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injections all failed to control relapsing pain and IOP elevation. Eventually, evisceration and hydroxyappatite implantation were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians must be alert to the possibility of IOP elevation in glaucomatous eyes during hemodialysis.

Comparison of Mitomycin C Trabeculectomy and Ahmed Valve Implant Surgery for Neovascular Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare the results of mitomycin C trabeculectomy and Ahmed valve implant surgery for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 58 patients (66 eyes) with NVG who had undergone mitomycin C trabeculectomy or Ahmed valve implant surgery in the previous 5 years. Trabeculectomy (A group) was performed in 27 eyes of 24 patients and valve implant surgery (B group) in 39 eyes of 34 patients. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, complications and the rate of surgical success of the two groups were compared. IOP under 21 mmHg without medication was considered as complete success (CS), under 21 mmHg with medication as qualified success (QS), and IOP over 22 mmHg despite medication as failure (F). RESULTS: IOP at postoperative 2 months was lower in the trabeculectomy group than in the drainage implant surgery group (16.4 +/- 11.3 mmHg, 20.9 +/- 8.7 mmHg, P=.087), but at 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference (18.4 +/- 11.5 mmHg, 17.0 +/- 6.4 mmHg, P=.608). Visual acuity also showed no significant difference. The respective rate of success between A and B groups was 66.7% and 38.5% (CS), 25.9% and 33.3% (QS), and 7.4% and 28.2% (F), at postoperative 2 months, and 47.8% and 42.3% (CS), 30.4% and 46.2% (QS), and 21.7% and 11.5% (F), at 12 months. The most common postoperative complication was hyphema in both groups, while other complications were shallow anterior chamber, valve problems, etc. CONCLUSIONS: The type of surgery had no significant effect on the success rate of neovascular glaucoma treatment at postoperative 12 months.