ABSTRACT
Objective:Four methods were used to count platelets to recommend suitable retest methods for abnormal blood platelet count.Methods:A total of 300 patients who received treatment in the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang during August-September 2020 were included in this study. They were divided into low-value, median-value, and high-value groups ( n = 100/group) according to blood platelet counts determined by the electrical impedance method. The consistency in blood platelet counting was analyzed between flow cytometry and electrical impedance method, Neubauer chamber method, and modified blood smear method. Results:There was no significant difference in blood platelet count between the electrical impedance method [low-value group: (86.1 ± 10.3) × 10 9/L, median-value group: (221.8 ± 41.8) × 10 9/L, high-value group: (441.3 ± 51.4) × 10 9/L, Neubauer chamber method [low-value group: (85.2 ± 10.1) × 10 9/L, median-value group: (219.3 ± 37.7) × 10 9/L, high-value group: (443.1 ± 54.5) × 10 9/L, modified blood smear technique [low-value group: (86.1 ± 10.1) × 10 9/L, median-value group: (218.1 ± 37.7) × 10 9/L, high-value group: (442.6 ± 53.3) × 10 9/L], and flow cytometry [low-value group: (85.4 ± 10.1) × 10 9/L, median-value group: (220.7 ± 42.0) × 10 9/L, high-value group: (440.9 ± 50.0) × 10 9/L] (all P > 0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the electrical impedance method, Neubauer chamber method and modified blood smear method, and flow cytometry showed consistency in blood platelet count. Conclusion:The modified blood smear method showed consistency with the electrical impedance method, Neubauer chamber method, and flow cytometry in blood platelet counting. It does not require a special instrument and can help observe cell morphology for blood platelet counting. In addition, the blood smears are easy to be preserved. The modified blood smear technique should be the first choice for re-checking blood platelet counts.
ABSTRACT
Normal concentration of WBCs in blood varies between 4000 and 11,000 per microliter and are classified intotwo variants namely granulocytes and agranulocytes on the basis of presence and absence of granules.Manual methods of calculation of TLC include- Neubauer chamber and estimating WBC on leishman stainedslides whereas automated methods are based on impedance or light scattering technology. The study comparedthe efficacy of both these methods in statistical terms using Chi Square test. 100 cases of leucocytosisanalyzed over a period of 1 year at MMIMSR, Mullana, Haryana revealed leucocytosis prevalent in 4-6 decadeof life with slight male predominance. The pearson coefficient for TLC came out to be p value =0.215 (notsignificant) but for DLC, calculations revealed p values for polymorphs, lymphocytes, eosinophils andmonocytes to be significant (p value =0.000 each). To conclude, standard manual methods should be advocatedas special practice where there is definite need of morphological and quantitative evaluation of WBCs and tovalidate the automated methods by which the laboratories can optimize patient care and not as a replacement
ABSTRACT
Sperm concentration is traditionally evaluated by counting cells in a hemocytometric Neubauer chamber, often a highly subjective, time-consuming, and laborious technique prevalent in andrology laboratories around the world. However, the Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) represents a more consistent method of evaluating sperm concentration that may provide enhancing efficiencies of sperm count. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of these two methods in the analysis of post-thaw concentration of bovine semen. Four hundred and twenty five batches of semen from different bulls were selected, thawed at 37°C for 30 seconds and then homogenized. Aliquots of 40 µL of semen were diluted in 960 µL of distilled water, fixing the rate at 1:25 dilution for analysis in a Neubauer chamber. Conversely, aliquots of 5 µL for each semen dose were submitted to CASA, considered a minimum of five random fields and 2000 sperm count per analysis. The average concentration of sperm cells was 38.96a ± 1.28 in the Neubauer analysis and 35.14b ± 0.82 for the CASA, with the correlation coefficient of 0.87 (P < 0.0001) and reliability of 0.78 (scale ranging from 0 to 1) between the two methods. In conclusion, the results of two techniques for assessing sperm concentration have similar results. However the CASA methodology would yield greater benefit due to precision, consistency, and reduced disposal issues, particularly for large processing laboratories.(AU)
Tradicionalmente, a concentração espermática é avaliada por meio da contagem de células em câmara hemocitométrica de Neubauer, técnica laboriosa adotada na rotina dos laboratórios de andrologia. Uma alternativa para essa contagem é a técnica computadorizada de avaliação espermática (CASA), método que pode aumentar a eficiência e acurácia na determinação da concentração de espermatozoides em uma amostra de sêmen. O presente trabalho relata a avaliação da sensibilidade da técnica CASA para o acesso da concentração de espermatozoides bovinos em pósdescongelação. Foram selecionadas 425 doses de sêmen de reprodutores de diferentes raças, descongeladas a 37°C por 30 segundos e homogeneizadas. Alíquotas de 40 µL de sêmen foram transferidas para tubos cônicos de 1,5 mL previamente preenchidos com 960 µL de água destilada, fixando a taxa de diluição em 1:25 para contagem em câmara de Neubauer. Em contrapartida, alíquotas de 5 µL de cada dose de sêmen foram avaliadas com o emprego do sistema CASA considerando o número mínimo de cinco campos aleatórios e 2 mil espermatozoides por análise. A concentração média de células espermáticas foi de 38,96a ± 1,28 e 35,14b ± 0,82,respectivamente para amostras avaliadas em câmara de Neubauer ou sistema computadorizado, apresentando o coeficiente de correlação de 0,87 (P < 0.0001) e concordância de 0,78 (escala de 0 a 1). Conclui-se que as duas técnicas de avaliação da concentração espermática possuem eficiência similar. No entanto, em virtude da precisão, rapidez e por dispensar a diluição prévia das amostras para a contagem, a CASA é uma alternativa para a contagem de células espermáticas em câmara de Neubauer, sobretudo para grandes centrais de produção de sêmen bovino congelado.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Sperm Count/methods , Sperm Count/veterinaryABSTRACT
Se comparó la metodología rutinaria de observación del sedimento urinario entre porta y cubreobjetos con el recuento en cámara de Neubauer, tomado como método de referencia y se verificó su capacidad de predicción de bacteriuria significativa. En un período de dos meses se realizaron 2.287 urocultivos. Sólo 1.153 resultaron evaluables según los criterios de exclusión y en 982 se pudo correlacionar ambos métodos microscópicos con el resultado de los cultivos. La correlación entre los recuentos en cámara y las observaciones del sedimento urinario fue del 96,4%. Las sensibilidades respectivas de la observación del sedimento y del recuento en cámara respecto del urocultivo fueron de 53,5% y 55,5%. Las especificidades respectivas fueron del 90,7% y 91,4%. A partir de los resultados obtenidos se infiere que la observación de leucocituria significativa es predictiva de la bacteriuria significativa. Por el contrario, su ausencia no puede ser un motivo para descartarla. La observación del sedimento entre porta y cubreobjetos resultó prácticamente equivalente al método más tedioso de recuento en cámara de Neubauer.
The current method of centrifuged urine smear was compared to the Neubauer chamber method, using this technique as the gold standard. Their predictive ability for detecting significant bacteriuria was determined. During two months, 2.287 urine cultures were studied. Only 1.153 were evaluable. In 982 samples a comparison between the two microscopic methods could be established. The correlation between them was 96,4%. The sensitivity of the centrifuged urine smear and the Neubauer chamber method was 53.5% and 55.5% respectively. Specificities were 90.7% and 91.4%. Those results pointed out that seeing a significant number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) both in the centrifuged urine smear and in the Neubauer chamber was predictive of significant bacteriuria. On the other hand, absence of PMNs is not an argument for not considering this possibility. Centrifuged urine was equivalent to the Neubauer chamber method in this comparative study.