ABSTRACT
Background: In spite of no scalpel vasectomy (NSV) being cheaper and safer, female sterilisations account for the majority of sterilisations performed worldwide. Research has focussed more on the “demand” and less on the “provider” side. Gynaecologists can be front-runners for the cause of population control in India. Hence, authors decided to estimate the knowledge of gynaecologists, their attitude and prevalent practice of NSV.Methods: Cross-sectional study. Interviewer-administered questionnaire used for face-to-face data collection from gynecologists registered with the Pune Obstetric and Gynecological Society.Results: Out of 447 gynecologists, 158 (35.3%) were males and 289 (64.7%) females. Mean age was 46.3 years ± 12.1 years, (range 24-80 years). Only 14 (3.1%) were trained in performing NSV. Only a minority knew about type of anaesthesia used (1.8%) and number of accesses needed (48.1%) for NSV. Only 40.7% and 18.1% knew about time to resume sexual activity and number of ejaculations to be covered by additional contraceptives after NSV respectively. More than half [258 (57.7%)] were willing to undergo training in NSV. Among those unwilling for training, female and older gynecologists (≥40 years) significantly outnumbered male and younger gynecologists (76.5% Vs. 23.5%; p=0.000 and 78.8% Vs. 21.2% respectively; p=0.000). Majority (79.9%) referred a couple willing for NSV to surgeons or urologists or advised female sterilization (17%).Conclusions: Knowledge of gynecologists about NSV was inadequate. Minority were trained in performing NSV. Male and younger gynecologists were willing to undergo training in NSV. Most preferred practices were referring couples elsewhere or advising female sterilization.
ABSTRACT
Background: Uttar Pradesh is the most populated state of the country having population of 199.581 million and total fertility rate of 3.3 (annual health survey [AHS] 2012�13) with high fertile trajectory. Currently, female sterilization accounts for about 18.4% and male sterilization for 0.3% of all sterilizations in Uttar Pradesh (AHS 2012�13). A strategy to promote men's involvement in effective birth control is needed to reduce the population growth. Since no scalpel vasectomy (NSV) is an easy method but still not being utilized; hence, the purpose of this research is to ascertain various factors of nonutilization of NSV. Objectives: The objective of the study is (i) to determine the barriers among married males for adopting NSV as a method of family planning, (ii) to determine the awareness about NSV, (iii) to suggest measures to increase uptake of NSV by the people. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. A two-staged multistage random sampling technique was used. Lucknow is divided into eight Nagar Nigam zones. In the first stage, two urban slums from each geographical zone were selected randomly. In the second stage, from each selected slum a sample of 24 eligible households was selected at random to achieve the desired sample size. Results: It was observed that among the study participants maximum 89.2% perceived Sociocultural barriers, while 0.6% of the participants perceived service delivery barriers. However, 14% of the participants also perceived procedure-related barriers as the most important cause for not accepting NSV. Conclusion: Measures should be taken to remove these barriers, and increase uptake of NSV.
ABSTRACT
Background: Since the introduction of male sterilization by surgery on deferens, several techniques have emerged to improve the results in terms of time, invasiveness, post operative infection, complications and success rate. Introduction: Vasectomy was introduced by Sharp in 1897. No scalpel vasectomy was introduced in China by Dr. Li Shun-Qiang in 1974. Intact fascial sheath helps in restoration of vas lumen and fascial sheath interposition prevents recanalization of vas by prevention of meeting of epithelialization from cut end of vas. Material and methods: The study was performed at PGIMS, Rohtak by performing surgery and follow-up up to one year of 326 subjects of no scalpel vasectomy. Clients were allocated in two groups. Group - A (155) with fascial sheath interposition and Group - B (171) without fascial sheath interposition. Surgeries were performed as a routine surgical procedure after full preparation of client including consent. Results: Majority of clients (56.1%) in Group - A were in age group 31-40 years followed by 22-30. years (28.4%), 41-50 years (14.8%) and 0.7% in age group more than 50 years. in Group - B, majority were also in age group 21-30 years (63.7%), followed by 31-40 years (29.8%), 41-50 years(5.9%) and 0.6% were of above 50 years. In Group - A, fascial sheath interposition was not possible in 17.2% clients due to non separation of sheath from vas. Sperm granuloma formation was observed in 8.6% in Group - A and 5.6% in Group-B. In comparison of 100% success rate in Group - A failure rate of 1.8% was observed in Group - B. Conclusion: The present study supports the existing literature that fascial sheath interposition adds a little more to the operating time of vasectomy, increases chances of wound infection and granuloma but has a less failure rate of vasectomy.