Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) ; (6)2004.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-540311

ABSTRACT

0.05). Conclusion We di d not find the difference between the two CYP2C19 phenotypes in relation to the acid-suppressing effect of esomeprazole.

2.
Chinese Journal of Digestion ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-571416

ABSTRACT

Objective To assess the incidence and management of nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB). Methods Forty patients with duodenal ulcer confirmed by gastroscopy were randomly divided into five groups, eight patients in each group. Patients were treated by the following strategies for a course of 5 days: group A (omeprazole 20 mg per day orally in the morning), group B (omeprazole 20 mg twice a day orally in the morning and at 4 p.m), group C (intravenous injection of omeprazole 40 mg twice a day in the morning and at 4 p.m), group D (omeprazole 20 mg per day orally in the morning plus ranitidine 150 mg at bed time) and group E (omeprazole 20 mg twice a day orally in the morming and at 4 p.m plus ranitidine 150 mg at bed time) respectively. Intragastric pH over 24 hours was recorded on the morning of the fifth day for each patient. Results In comparison with that in group A, intragastric pH was higher in the other four groups. The mean intragastric pH and mean nocturnal pH each in group B (6.2?0.7, 6.4?1.1), group C (6.9?0.7, 6.8?0.9), group D (6.0?0.7, 5.9?0.7) and group E (5.8?0.5, 6.1?0.5) were significantly higher than those in group A (4.8?0.7, 4.7?0.8, P

3.
Chinese Journal of Digestion ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-570240

ABSTRACT

Objective To assess the incidence of noctu rnal acid breakthrough(NAB) and its' relationship with Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection in patients with duodenal ulcer. Methods Forty duodenal ulcer patients were randomly allocated in to five groups. Patients were treated by intravenous injection of omeprazole 40 mg twice daily(group 1), once daily(group 2), omeprazole 20 mg twice daily oral ly(group 3), omeprazole 20 mg once daily orally(group 4), and intravenous inject ion of cimetidine 600 mg twice daily (group 5) all for 5 days. Intragastric pH o ver 24 hours was consecutively recorded on the fifth day for each patient. Results The mean intragastric pH, median intragastric pH, nocturn al mean pH and nocturnal median pH in group 1(6.9?0.7,7.3?0.8,6.8?0.9,7.1? 0 .7) were significantly higher than those of group 2 (5.3?1.6,5.6?1.7,4.9?1. 5,4.3?1.7),group 4(4.8?0.7,4.8?1.0,4.7?0.8,4.5?0.8), and group 5(4.4?2.4 ,4.5?2.5,4.6?2.7,4.3?2.1), but not higher than group 3(6.2?0.7,6.3?0.8,6. 4?1.1,6.4?0.8). High intragastric pH was produced in all five groups. The frac tion time of pH below 4.0 in group 1(3.1%) and group 3(4.5%) were significantly fewer than that in the other three groups(group 2,27.8%; group 4, (32.4)%, and group 5,48.2%) respectively. NAB occurred in 1 patient from two omeprazole twice dai ly groups(6.3 %, group 1 and 3) and in 9 patients from two omeprazole once daily groups((56.3 %,) group 2 and 4,P

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL