Sensibilidad al gluten no celíaca / Non-celiac Gluten sensitivity

Introducción: La sensibilidad al gluten no celíaca es una afección emergente descrita en la última década, mediada por mecanismos inmunes, sin reconocido marcador serológico. Objetivo: Actualizar los conocimientos sobre esta condición, patogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Métodos: Se revisaron las publicaciones en español e inglés en bases de datos de Google académico, PubMed, Scielo y Latindex desde el 2014 hasta el 20 agosto 2018. Resultados: Se trata de una afección no alérgica ni autoinmune. Se analiza su repercusión en niños y adultos. La epidemiología no está establecida, su presencia varía entre 6-10 por ciento, con predominio femenino/masculino 3:1. Se revisaron los criterios sobre la patogenia relacionados con las prolaminas de cereales tóxicos, carbohidratos de cadena corta fermentable e inhibidores de amilasa y tripsina. Se evaluaron los síntomas clínicos (intestinales y extraintestinales) y analizaron los argumentos del diagnóstico definitivo y diferencial con otras enfermedades desencadenadas por gluten. La dieta sin gluten representa la única opción terapéutica. Los síntomas desaparecen con su supresión y reaparecen con su reintroducción. Consideraciones finales: La sensibilidad al gluten no celíaca es una entidad de nueva aparición con participación de procesos inmunes y patogenia sustentada por distintos mecanismos con síntomas intestinales y extraintestinales relacionados con consumo de gluten. El diagnóstico no debe ser por exclusión del gluten, sino evaluación clínica, pues no existe diagnóstico serológico. Hay otras afecciones con similares manifestaciones como enfermedad celíaca, alergia al gluten, síndrome intestino irritable y enteritis linfocítica, con las que se debe hacer diagnóstico diferencial(AU)

Introduction: Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (SGNC, by its acronyms in Spanish) is an emerging condition of the last decade, which is mediated by immune mechanisms without a recognized serological marker. Objective: To update knowledge on SGNC, its pathogenesis, diagnostic and treatment. Methods: Publications in Spanish and English were reviewed in Google scholar, PubMed, SciELO and Latindex databases from 2014 to August 20, 2018. Results: Information about the description of SGNC as a non-allergic or autoimmune condition and impact on children and adults is updated. Epidemiology is not established, although recent studies report that it varies between 6 to 10 percent, with predominance of female / male 3:1. The criteria for the pathogenesis related to the prolamines of toxic cereals, fermentable short chain carbohydrates (FODMAPs) and amylase and trypsin inhibitors are reviewed. The clinical symptoms (intestinal and extraintestinal) were evaluated and it was analyzed the argument established for the diagnosis of certainty and differential with other diseases triggered by gluten, especially celiac disease. The gluten-free diet represents the only treatment option. The symptoms disappear with gluten suppression and reappear when re-introducing it. Final Considerations: SGNC is a new entity mediated by an immune mechanism with pathogenesis supported by different mechanisms with intestinal and extra intestinal symptoms related to gluten consumption. The diagnosis should not be by exclusion of foods that contain gluten, but by clinical evaluation since there is not serological diagnosis. To know better on it is of interest due to other conditions, such as celiac disease, gluten allergy, irritable bowel syndrome and lymphocytic enteritis, which should be made by differential diagnosis(AU)

Enfermedad celíaca, sensibilidad no celíaca al gluten y alergia al trigo: comparación de patologías diferentes gatilladas por un mismo alimento / Celiac disease, non celiac gluten sensitivity and wheat allergy: comparison of 3 different diseases triggered by the same food

El gluten y otras proteínas relacionadas del trigo, centeno y cebada, tienen propiedades antigénicas que pueden desencadenar reacciones adversas en individuos susceptibles. La enfermedad celíaca fue la primera patología en que se estableció relación causal con estas proteínas alimentarias. Recientemente se han descrito la alergia al trigo y la sensibilidad no celíaca al gluten. Si bien sus formas de presentación clínica y su relación con la ingesta pueden ser similares, sus mecanismos patogénicos, forma de diagnóstico y tratamiento difieren. Dado que su prevalencia en conjunto es relativamente alta, resulta necesario que los médicos de atención primaria y pediatras se familiaricen con estas patologías, sepan cómo diferenciarlas y enfrentarlas. El objetivo de esta revisión es comparar los principales aspectos de epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas 3 condiciones.

Gluten and other related proteins of the wheat, rye and barley, have antigenic properties that may trigger adverse reactions in susceptible individuals. Celiac disease was the first pathology with clear causal association related to the intake of these proteins. Recently, wheat allergy and non celiac gluten sensitivity have been described. Although, clinical presentation and its relation with protein ingestion may be similar and elicit confusion, their pathogenic mechanism, diagnosis and treatment are quite different. Since the prevalence of these diseases is relatively high as a whole, it is essential that these become familiar to primary care doctors and general pediatricians, thus they will know how to differentiate and face them. The aim of this review is to compare the main aspects of epidemiology, pathofisiology, diagnosis and treatment of these 3 conditions.

Nutritional status variation and intestinal and extra intestinal symptomatology in patients with celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity given specialized dietary advice / Evolução do estado nutricional e sintomatologia intestinal e extra intestinal em pacientes com doença celíaca e sensibilidade ao glúten não celíaca submetidos à orientação dietética especializada

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the nutritional status variation and symptomatology of patients with celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity after specialized dietary advice Methods: This prospective study included 80 patients with celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Clinical, metabolic, and nutritional variables were collected from medical records, and the symptomatology was investigated by the Metabolic Screening Questionnaire. The variables were assessed on two occasions (T1 - before dietary advice and T2 - after dietary advice) with an interval of three months between T1 and T2 Results: The median age was 42 years. The prevalences of celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity were 66.2% and 33.8%, respectively. Normal weight prevailed at T1 (58.8%) and T2 (56.3%), but 30.0% of the patients at T1 and 34.9% of the patients at T2 had excess weight. The two conditions had similar symptomatology. The most frequent signs and symptoms on both occasions involved the gastrointestinal tract, followed by energy/activity and emotions. All symptoms decreased significantly after the introduction of a proper diet Conclusion: The patients were normal weight on both study occasions (T1 and T2), and the symptoms improved after dietary advice. Thus, we reinforce the importance of proper dietary management in both clinical conditions to make dietary adjustments that improve these individuals' symptomatology.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a evolução do estado nutricional e a sintomatologia de pacientes com doença celíaca e sensibilidade ao glúten não celíaca após orientação dietética especializada Métodos: O estudo prospectivo foi realizado com 80 pacientes portadores da doença celíaca e de sensibilidade ao glúten não celíaca. A coleta das variáveis clínicas, metabólicas e nutricionais foi feita por análise dos prontuários, enquanto a sintomatologia foi investigada por meio de Questionário de Rastreamento Metabólico. As variáveis foram avaliadas em dois momentos (T1 - antes da orientação dietética e T2 - após orientação dietética), com intervalo de 3 meses entre T1 e T2 Resultados: A mediana de idade foi de 42 anos. A prevalência de doença celíaca e de sensibilidade ao glúten não celíaca foi de 66,2% e 33,8%, respectivamente. A eutrofia prevaleceu como estado nutricional de T1 (58,8%) e T2 (56,3%), porém 30,0% dos pacientes em T1 e 34,9% em T2 apresentaram excesso de peso. A sintomatologia foi similar entre as duas enfermidades. Os sinais e sintomas mais frequentes nos dois tempos foram os do trato digestório, seguido pelos relacionados à energia/atividade e às emoções. Todos os sintomas diminuíram significativamente após a introdução da dieta Conclusão: Os pacientes apresentaram estado nutricional de eutrofia nos dois momentos avaliados (T1 e T2) e houve redução dos sintomas após as orientações nutricionais. Dessa forma, reitera-se a importância do manejo dietético adequado para ambas as enfermidades clínicas a fim de adequar a dieta que favoreça a melhora da sintomatologia apresentada por esses indivíduos.

Symptomatic improvement with gluten restriction in irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double blinded placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The existence of non-celiac gluten sensitivity has been debated. Indeed, the intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms of many patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but without celiac disease or wheat allergy have been shown to improve on a gluten-free diet. Therefore, this study set out to evaluate the effects of gluten on IBS symptoms. METHODS: We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled rechallenge trial in a tertiary care hospital with IBS patients who fulfilled the Rome III criteria. Patients with celiac disease and wheat allergy were appropriately excluded. The participants were administered a gluten-free diet for 4 weeks and were asked to complete a symptom-based questionnaire to assess their overall symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, wind, and tiredness on the visual analog scale (0-100) at the baseline and every week thereafter. The participants who showed improvement were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive either a placebo (gluten-free breads) or gluten (whole cereal breads) as a rechallenge for the next 4 weeks. RESULTS: In line with the protocol analysis, 60 patients completed the study. The overall symptom score on the visual analog scale was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Moreover, the patients in the gluten intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of abdominal pain, bloating, and tiredness (P<0.05), and their symptoms worsened within 1 week of the rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS: A gluten diet may worsen the symptoms of IBS patients. Therefore, some form of gluten sensitivity other than celiac disease exists in some of them, and patients with IBS may benefit from gluten restrictions.

Symptomatic improvement with gluten restriction in irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double blinded placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The existence of non-celiac gluten sensitivity has been debated. Indeed, the intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms of many patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but without celiac disease or wheat allergy have been shown to improve on a gluten-free diet. Therefore, this study set out to evaluate the effects of gluten on IBS symptoms. METHODS: We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled rechallenge trial in a tertiary care hospital with IBS patients who fulfilled the Rome III criteria. Patients with celiac disease and wheat allergy were appropriately excluded. The participants were administered a gluten-free diet for 4 weeks and were asked to complete a symptom-based questionnaire to assess their overall symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, wind, and tiredness on the visual analog scale (0-100) at the baseline and every week thereafter. The participants who showed improvement were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive either a placebo (gluten-free breads) or gluten (whole cereal breads) as a rechallenge for the next 4 weeks. RESULTS: In line with the protocol analysis, 60 patients completed the study. The overall symptom score on the visual analog scale was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Moreover, the patients in the gluten intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of abdominal pain, bloating, and tiredness (P<0.05), and their symptoms worsened within 1 week of the rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS: A gluten diet may worsen the symptoms of IBS patients. Therefore, some form of gluten sensitivity other than celiac disease exists in some of them, and patients with IBS may benefit from gluten restrictions.

Sensibilidad no celíaca al gluten: Una patología más que responde al gluten / Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: Another condition that responds to gluten

Remission of gastrointestinal and general symptoms after gluten withdrawal has been described in some non-celiac individuals for nearly 30 years. Only recently, efforts have been made to define this entity, now referred to as "non- celiac gluten sensitivity". It includes patients that clinically respond to gluten free diet without exhibiting allergic or autoimmune features to explain such response. Wheat allergy, celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome and symptoms induced by high FODMAPs (Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides And Polyols) consumption are the main differential diagnoses. The relationship with neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and autism has not been demonstrated, but currently it gives ground to great hope in families with affected children. Epidemiology of non-celiac gluten sensitivity is not clear. It is described as more common among women and less common in children. Genetic and immune factors, changes in intestinal microbiota and non-gluten components present in wheat grains are main factors postulated in the pathogenesis of this condition. To date, there are no specific biomarkers for non-celiac gluten sensitivity and diagnosis is reached by excluding other causes of disease. A trial with gluten-free diet and subsequent gluten challenge is the methodology most frequently used to confirm diagnosis.