Historia y desarrollo de la artroplastía de cadera: una visión de sus aciertos, fallas y enseñanzas. (Segunda parte) / History and development of hip arthroplasty: a vision of its successes, failures and teachings. (Part two)

Resumen: Ésta es la segunda de dos partes de la Historia y Desarrollo de la Artroplastía de Cadera. En esta parte se hace una revisión histórica del desarrollo de la artroplastía contemporánea de la cadera, dando continuidad a la primera, donde se analizaron los cuatro primeros períodos. Esta quinta etapa corresponde a la revisión de su última etapa que comprende desde 1970 hasta el momento actual. También se hacen comentarios acerca de nuestras actitudes en el presente y la ruta que vislumbramos hacia el futuro.

Abstract: This is the second of two parts of the history and development of hip arthroplasty. In this part, a historical review of the development of contemporary hip alloarthroplasty is made. The purpose of this part is to give continuity to the first one where the first four periods were analyzed. This fifth part corresponds to the revision of its last stage that includes from 1970 to the present time. Comments are also made about our attitudes in the present and the route we envision towards the future.

Evaluation of Outcome of Non-cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head in 25 to 40 Years Age Group

Background: The proper treatment of Avascular Necrosis(AVN) of Femoral Head has become a major challengeworldwide in younger age group as they are main effectiveforce of family and society. The patients who are young andsuffer from AVN of femoral head become immovable, worklessand unproductive. Thus they become burden to family andsociety. The Hip Replacement is a better way of treatment forthis type of patients, making them pain free and movable andimproving their everyday activity.Objective: To evaluate outcome of non-cemented total hiparthroplasty in avascular necrosis of femoral head among theactive younger age group of patients.Method: This was a prospective observational study of 30patients and all the patients had done non-cemented total hiparthroplasty (THA) through lateral approach at the NationalInstitute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation(NITOR), Dhaka.Results: Mean age of the patients was 32 ±5.12 years,patients were diagnosed as Avascular Necrosis of FemoralHead in which 63% were affected at Right sided Hip 37%patients were at Left sided hip. Final outcome after six monthsof operation evaluated with Modified Harris Hip Score revealedthat, there was significant (p<0.005) improvement in functionalability of the patients after THA. Among the 30 studied cases,21 (70%) patients carried slight pain and 63.4% of them wereable to walk unlimitedly. Outcome of supporting functionanalysis indicated 76.7% patients could walk and climb stairswithout support and 100% patients could sit on chair, 66.7%patients among them could walk without limping. On clinicalassessment of deformity, range of motion before and afteroperation, significantly resolved the deformities and increasedthe range of motion (2100-2300). After evaluation with ModifiedHarris Hip Score showed that 60% excellent (HHS 90-100),30% good (HHS 80-89), 10% had fair (HHS 90-100) outcome.Conclusion: The progressive study of the patients of THAshowed that non-cemented THA has resulted in a better wayamong the younger age group of people

Non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction for bone defect after tumor resection in lower extremities / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To report the preliminary clinical results and analyze the prognostic factors of prosthetic failures with non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction after tumor resection in lower extremities. Methods: A clinical data of 150 patients with lower extremity tumors treated with MEGASYSTEM-C non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction between October 2011 and September 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 88 males and 62 females, aged from 12 to 81 years, with a median age of 24 years. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone tumors, 120 cases were primary malignant tumors, 27 cases were intermediate tumors, and 3 cases were metastatic tumors. Among them, 134 cases underwent primary operation and 16 cases underwent reoperation after recurrence. Eighty-seven patients with malignant tumors received chemotherapy before and after operation, and no patient received local radiotherapy during perioperative period. Proximal femur was reconstructed in 32 cases, distal femur in 83 cases, and proximal tibia in 35 cases. The postoperative follow-up time, the results of oncology (survival status and tumor recurrence), and prosthesis failure (prosthesis survival rate, reasons for failure, treatment plan after failure) were recorded. The reason of the prosthesis failure was classified into 5 types according to the classification defined by Henderson et al. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank test were used to analyze patient and prosthesis survival. Lower extremity function was assessed by using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and MSTS scores were compared for patients with different reconstruction sites. Results: All patients were followed up 5-84 months, the median follow-up time was 39 months. During the follow-up period, there were 116 cases of tumor-free survival, 10 cases of tumor-bearing survival, and 24 died of lung metastasis or multiple metastases. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 120 patients with primary malignant tumors were 83.1% and 76.6%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites ( P=0.851). Seven cases (4.7%) had local recurrence at 7-21 months after operation. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the prosthesis in 150 patients were 94.4% and 92.5%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites ( P=0.765). There were 26 failures in 24 patients (16.0%) during the follow-up period. There were 9 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 2 failure, 3 cases of type 3 failure, 5 cases of type 4 failure, and 8 cases of type 5 failure. At last follow-up, 120 of the 126 patients survived without prosthetic failure. Except that the influence of different parts of prosthesis on the incidence of type 4 failure ( P=0.029), the influence of chemotherapy on the incidence of type 5 failure ( P=0.002) were significant, the influence of other types of failure on different reconstructed parts of prosthesis, initial operation, and perioperative chemotherapy had no significant difference ( P>0.05). There were 5 cases of amputation (4 cases of type 5 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of prosthesis removal (1 case of type 2 failure, 1 case of type 3 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of revision while keeping the original prosthesis (2 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 5 failure). The overall MSTS score was 24±3. The MSTS scores were 24±3, 25±3, and 23±3 in patients whose reconstruction sites located in proximal femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia, respectively, showing no significant difference ( F=3.014, P=0.052). Conclusion: The short-term follow-up showed a lower incidence of complications and good function for MEGASYSTEM-C non-cement modular prosthesis system in treatment of bone defects after lower limb tumor resection. The main factors affecting the early survival of prosthesis were tumor progression and infection.

Comparison of Perioperative Blood Loss in Primary Non-cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Rapidly Destructive Coxarthrosis and Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head / 대한고관절학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative blood loss in primary non-cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) with the perioperative blood loss in primary non-cemented THA for typical osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2013, 19 patients were diagnosed with RDC (group 1) and 40 patients were diagnosed typical Ficat stage IV ONFH (group 2), comparison of perioperative blood loss between group 1 and group 2 in primary noncemented THA was done. Patients with preoperative usage of steroid or anticoagulants medication and with hemodynamic abnormal blood test results were excluded. The blood loss was measured up to the fifth post operation day and calculated with formula proposed by Mercuriali, Inghilleri and Nadler. RESULTS: Non-compensated blood loss calculated in milliliters of red blood cells was 362 mL (standard deviation [SD], 187; range, 77-675) in group 1 and 180 mL (SD, 145; range, 53-519) in group 2. Compensated blood loss was 630 mL (SD, 180; range, 380-760) in group 1 and 503 mL (SD, 260; range, 190-1, 505) in group 2. The total blood loss after primary non-cemented THA is greater when surgery is performed for RDC than for ONFH, with the volume of 992 mL (SD, 300; range, 457-1, 434) in group 1 and 683 mL (SD, 360; range, 226-1, 975) in group 2 respectively. CONCLUSION: Total perioperative blood loss was significantly greater in RDC than in ONFH in primary non-cemented THA.

Estudio densitométrico de diez años de remodelación femoral tras la implantación de un vástago anatómico / Étude densitométrique de dix ans d'un remodelage fémoral après implantation d'une tige anatomique / A Ten-Year sensitometric study of femoral remodeling after implantation of an anatomical stem

Introducción: la absorciometría dual con rayos X es comúnmente utilizada para cuantificar la remodelación ósea periprotésico, normalmente en seguimientos a corto plazo. Objetivo: determinar los patrones de remodelado producidos por vástago anatómico, mediante la cuantificación de cambios en la densidad mineral ósea en las 7 zonas de Gruen, durante el seguimiento, así como analizar la influencia de otros factores en el remodelado óseo. Métodos: se realizó un estudio prospectivo (10 años de seguimiento) a un grupo de 39 pacientes a los que se implantó una prótesis total de cadera no cementada. Se utilizó la cadera sana contralateral como control. Para cuantificar la remodelación femoral periprotésica se utilizó la absorciometría dual con rayos X en las 7 zonas de Gruen. Las mediciones de masa ósea se realizaron a los 15 días, 1, 3 y 10 años tras la intervención en la cadera no operada y a los 15 días, 1, 3, 5 y 10 años de la operación en la cadera protetizada. Se analizó también la influencia de otros factores en el remodelado óseo (sexo, índice de masa corporal y masa ósea preoperatoria). Resultados: se halló un descenso de la densidad mineral ósea del 7 por ciento en la zona 1 de Gruen y del 24,1 por ciento en la zona 7 de Gruen al final del décimo año. El sexo, el índice de masa corporal y la masa ósea preoperatoria no fueron estadísticamente relevantes en su influencia sobre el remodelado óseo. Conclusión: la remodelación ósea periprotésica depende en su mayor parte del implante, no se halló correlación con sexo, índice de masa corporal o masa ósea preoperatoria(AU)

Introduction: Dual X-ray absorptiometry is commonly used to quantify periprosthetic bone remodeling, usually for short-term follow up. Objective: determine patterns of remodeling caused by anatomical stem, by quantifying changes in bone mineral density in the 7 Gruen zones during follow up and analyze the influence of other factors in bone remodeling. Methods: a prospective study (10 year follow-up) was performed to a group of 39 patients undergoing uncemented total hip prosthesis. The healthy hip was used as control. Dual X-ray absorptiometry in Gruen zones 7 was used to quantify the femoral periprosthetic remodeling. Bone mass measurements were performed at 15 days, 1, 3 and 10 years after surgery on the non-operated hip, and at 15 days, 1, 3, 5 and 10 years of operation in the prosthetic hip. The influence of other factors in bone remodeling (sex, body mass index, and preoperative bone mass) was also analyzed. Results: 7 percent of decrease in bone mineral density was found in Gruen zone 1 and 24.1 percent was found in Gruen zone 7 at the end of the tenth year of follow up. Sex, body mass index and preoperative bone density were not statistically significant in its influence on bone remodeling. Conclusions: periprosthetic bone remodeling depends mainly on the implant. No correlation has been found with sex, body mass index and preoperative preoperative bone density(AU)

Introduction: l'absorptiométrie biphotonique à rayons X est fréquemment utilisée pour évaluer le remodelage osseux péri-prothétique, notamment par des suivis à court terme. Objectif: le but de cette étude est de déterminer les standards du remodelage osseux péri-prothétique produits par une tige anatomique, et d'analyser également l'influence d'autres facteurs sur le remodelage osseux. Méthodes: une étude prospective (suivi de 10 ans) d'un groupe de 39 patients, ayant subi une implantation de prothèse de hanche sans ciment, a été réalisée. Afin d'évaluer le remodelage fémoral périprothétique, on a effectué une absorptiométrie biphotonique à rayons X dans les 7 zones de Gruen. On a mesuré la DMO de la hanche non-opérée aux 15 jours et 1, 3, et 10 ans après la chirurgie, ainsi que la DMO de la hanche opérée aux 15 jours et 1, 3, 5, et 10 ans après la chirurgie. On a également analysé le retentissement d'autres facteurs (sexe, indice de masse corporelle, densité osseuse préopératoire) sur le remodelage osseux. Résultats: à la fin de la dixième année, on a trouvé une perte de la DMO de 7 pourcent dans la zone 1, et de 24.1 pourcent dans la zone 7. Le sexe, l'indice de masse corporelle et la masse osseuse préopératoire n'ont pas statistiquement influé sur le remodelage osseux. Conclusions: le remodelage osseux péri-prothétique dépend notamment de l'implant ; on n'a pas trouvé de corrélation avec le sexe, l'indice de masse corporelle ou la densité osseuse préopératoire(AU)

Femoral Fracture in Non-Cemented hip Arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지

The femoral fracture, occurred associated with the cemented hip arthroplasty, is well-known cornplication but the proximal femoral fractures of the noncemented hip arthroplasty, were occurred more than those. Among the 290 patients, who were treated by the noncemented hip arthroplasty from Dec. 1987 to April 1992, the 24 cases of the femoral fracture were experienced and the results were as follows: 1) of the 24 cases, the male was nine and the female was fifteen. The age distribution was mostly occurred between 41 and 60 years old and most fracture were developed in 1 1mm stem size. In revision cases, 225mm stem length (Wagner) was common. The locations of fracture were proximal 1/3 (type I: 19 cases), tip (type II; 1 case), distal 1/3 (type III; 1 case) and comminuted (type IV; 3 cases) by Johansson; siclassification. 2) The femoral fracture was mostly developed during the stem insertion and the fracture site in anatomical stem was only proximal femur. 3) 1n cases of revision, most of the fractures were occured on the anterior or lateral side of the femur. It was difficult to manage the fracture because of the severe osteoporosis and comminution. 4) As the problem of the operative technique, the fracture incidence can be decreased by accurate preoperative measurement and it must be cautious in the stem more than 225 mm length, which were used in revision case. 5) The circumferential wiring for proximal and plate & screws in middle and distal were done as the treatment of fracture and the results were all good, but stem tip fracture in osteoporotic patients was troublesome. We think that long plate(>8 holes) & both cortex purchase and bone graft are best methods so far.