ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the advantages and disadvantages of transvaginal hysterectomy for patients with non-prolapsed uterus,and explore the cause and preventive measurements of the complications of transvaginal hysterectomy.Methods The complications of transvaginal hysterectomy ( group TVH ) in 110 patients with non-prolapsed uterus and of transabdominal hysterectomy ( group TAH ) in 120 patients were compared with each other.These patients were chosen randomly from June 2006 to April 2010.Results In the TVH group,rectum hurt occurred in one patient,prolapse of fallopian tube in one patient and celiac internal bleeding in one patient.The preoperative diagnosis were not consistent with the postoperative diagnosis in four patients.Two patients encountered with postoperative residual end bleeding and four patients with vaginal residual end polyps.In the TAH group,three patients had postoperative diagnosis inconsistent with their preoperative diagnosis.In addition,there were four abdominal wall incision liquefaction ( including two phase suture in two patients),three postoperative bronchial lung infection and two residual end polyps.No celiac internal bleeding and visceral injury occurred in this group.Conclusion TVH has a higher risk of visceral injury and postoperative bleeding than TAH.These complications should be avoided when treating the patients with TVH technique.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo explore the application value and techniques of vaginal hysterectomy of non-prolapsed uterus lesion in primary hospital. Methods140 cases who suffered from uterine fibroid without adhesion,glandular fibroids,functional bleeding without uterine prolapse and malignant disease were selected and divided into observation group(80 cases with vaginal hysterectomy)and control group(60 cases with routine abdominal hysterectomy).Then the clinical treatment effect was analyzed. ResultsCompared with control group,peri-operative bleeding (150 ±23)ml vs(243 ±41)ml,operation time(65 ± 14.0)min vs(90 ± 27.0)min,body temperature recovery time (3 ±0.5)d vs(4 ±0.8)d,anus exhaust time(14 ± 1.8)h vs(26 ±2.7)h,the length of time(5 ±0.8)d vs(11 ±2.9)d in observation group were all reduced,differences were significant(all P＜0.01)and no case was transferred to opening appendectomy. ConclusionFor these disease including uterine fibroids with no adhesion,glandular fibroid uterine bleeding,the vaginal hysterectomy was safe and feasible,and had the advantage of smaller trauma,less bleeding,shorter hospitalization time,faster recovery etc.It was worthy to be popularized in primary hospital.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the postoperative recovery of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies of non-prolapsed uterus ,in order to offer the advantages, surgical indications and contraindieations ,surgical characteristic and diflieuhy of transvaginal hysterectomies of non-prolapsed uterus. Methods To retrospectively analyze 480 cases transvaginal hysterectomies (TVH) and 440 cases transabdominal hysterectomies (TAH) with similar indications in the corresponding period, and compare the operation duration ,blood lost during the procedure, postoperative analgesic, morbidity, recovery time of the function of intestine, activity time of getting up and hospitalization between those surgi-ca] techniques. Results There were no intraoperation and postoperative complications in group TVH. In group TAH: more blood was lost(P <0.01) ,the function of intestine recovered more slowly(P <0.01) ,more analgesic needed, more morbidity noted (P < 0.01), activity time of getting up is much longer(P < 0.01). The hospital stay after opera-tion was much shorter in group TVH(P <0.01). No statistical difference was found between the two groups in terms of the duration(P 0.05). Conclusion TVH is minimal invasive surgery that include small trauma,reduced pain, no abdomen scar and quick recovery. So the patients are happy to accept it.