Long-term follow-up in sacroiliac joint pain patients treated with radiofrequency ablative therapy / Seguimento longo em pacientes com sacroileíte submetidos a terapia de radiofrequência ablativa

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is responsible for up to 40% of all cases of lumbar back pain. Objective Report the long-term efficacy of radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain at six, twelve and eighteen months.Method Third-two adults’ patients with sacroiliac join pain diagnosis were included for a prospective study. Primary outcome measure was pain intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measure was Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC).Results Short-term pain relief was observed, with the mean NRS pain score decreasing from 7.7 ± 1.8 at baseline to 2.8 ± 1.2 at one month and to 3.1 ± 1.9 at six months post-procedure (p < 0.001). Long-term pain relief was sustained at twelve and eighteen months post-procedure, with NRS pain remaining at 3.4 ± 2.1 and 4.0 ± 2.7, respectively.Conclusion Radiofrequency denervation of the SIJ can significantly reduce pain in selected patients with sacroiliac syndrome.

A Sacroileíte pode ser responsável por até 40% dos casos de dor lombar crônica. Objetivo Análise da eficácia da denervação por radiofrequência na articulação sacro-ilíaca em seis, doze e dezoito meses.Método Trinta e dois pacientes com diagnóstico de sacroileíte foram incluídos em estudo prospectivo. O prognóstico primário foi avaliado pela escala visual analógico (NRS). O prognóstico secundário foi avaliado pela escala de impressão global de mudança pelo paciente (PGIC).Resultados Melhora a curto prazo da dor foi observada, com redução media na NRS de 7,7 ± 1,8 para 2,8 ± 1,2 após 1 mês e para 3,1 ± 1,9 em 6 meses do procedimento (p < 0,001). Após 12 e 18 meses, o NRS manteve-se 3,4 ± 2,1 e 4,0 ± 2,7, respectivamente.Conclusão A denervação da articulação sacro-ilíaca por radiofrequência pode reduzir significativamente a dor em pacientes com sacroileíte.

Correlation of numeric rating scale with pure tone audiogram for assessing hearing loss.

Objective: Hearing loss is the public health problem affecting all the age groups. For the assessment of hearing loss pure tone audiogram (PTA) is the gold standard but cannot be easily available in rural areas. So, the main aim of our study is to see the correlation of numeric rating scale with the pure tone audiogram for assessing the hearing loss. Materials and methods: This was the prospective, non randomized and longitudinal study performed in two hundred patients with unilateral hearing loss. For the study purpose, the numeric rating scale (NRS) was divided into 5 parts as that of degree of hearing loss and the PTAwas also divided into 5 parts to see the correlation with the NRS findings. The analysis was done using SPSS 16.0 Software. Results: The total frequency of unilateral hearing loss was 1.79%. 125(62.5%) patients fell within 16 – 25years.The mean age was 23.2+/-9.7.Females were affected more than males. Most of the patients who were in high school had unilateral hearing loss. Students and housewives accounted for 87.5%. 89% patients had conductive hearing loss, 10% had sensorineural hearing loss whereas only 1% patients had mixed hearing loss. The most of patients reported NRS2 and NRS3 which was 85.5%. Regarding the PTA analysis, 91% patients fell within mild and moderate hearing loss. There was high degree of correspondence in mild hearing loss between NRS and PTA. The Pearson’s correlation showed the statistically significant correlation between NRS and PTA with p=0.00 Conclusion: The NRS scale can be used as an optional measure for PTAin assessing the hearing loss mainly in rural areas for screening where there is lack of PTA.

Correlation between the Likert Scale and the Numeric Rating Scale for Evaluating Knee Pain

PURPOSE: The Likert scale and the numeric rating scale (NRS) have been widely used to evaluate knee pain. The purpose of the present study is to compare the Likert scale and the NRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 350 patients who had painful knees were investigated from June 2008 to June 2009. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 98 patients who were admitted for total knee replacement, while group 2 consisted of 141 patients who underwent total knee replacement within a minimum of 1 year (range: 1 to 5 year), and group 3 included 111 patients who were treated with conservative methods. We simultaneously evaluated the Likert scale and the NRS and we analyzed the relationships between them using Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between the Likert scale and the NRS was -0.91. The correlation coefficients for each group was -0.75 (group 1), -0.78 (group 2), and -0.68 (group 3), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Likert scale was correlated with the NRS and there were no significant differences between these two scales for evaluating knee pain. It is believed that the Likert scale is another useful tool for expressing knee pain.

Effects of the Pain Level Memory Device on cancer pain management

<b>Objective</b>: The Pain Level Memory Device (PLMD) is an instrument which patients can use to record their subjective level of pain. The usefulness of the PLMD on both medical staffs in managing cancer pain and the independence of patients were examined in this study. <b>Method</b>: Ten participants, inpatients at Nagoya University Hospital prescribed opioid drugs for cancer pain, were selected and asked to input any change in their pain level into the PLMD for a 14 day period between February and April 2005. A graph of the resulting data was printed and given to both the patient and medical staffs. And a questionnaire evaluating their experience with the PLMD was developed and administered to both. Relationships between the frequency of use of the PLMD and item-scores on the questionnaire were investigated. <b>Results</b>: The median number of inputs into the PLMD was 4.5 (range: 0.5-11) per day. High usage of the PLMD and each high score for the questionnaire items "The PLMD helped assessment of pain (p<.05)" and "The patients satisfaction with pain control improved (p<.05)" were strongly correlated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed a relationship between the median number of inputs and the questionnaire items, "I used the PLMD whenever I intended to (r=.80, p<.01)", ""I saw graphs (r=.78, p<.01)", "I discussed graphs with my doctor (r=.70, p<.05)", "I felt that I participated in my pain management (r=.82, p<.01)", and "I would recommend the PLMD to other patients (r=.80, p<.01)". <b>Conclusion</b>: These results suggested that the PLMD could assist medical staff in the control of cancer pain and support the independence of patients.

Trial test of the "Itamikei", a pain meter and its ease of operation for clinical practice

The purpose of this study was to develop the "Itamikei", a small machine which records the subjective level of pain between 0-10. In addition to testing it's ease of operation and usefulness in the clinical practice environment. The "Itamikei" is 23 cm x 6 cm x 2 cm. It weighs 160 grams. It has 11 buttons, relating to the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Each time a button is pushed the level of pain is recorded, along with the time and date. Later, this data can be transferred to computer displayed graphically showing the patient's subjective level of pain. This research was a case study for using the "Itamikei". One in-patient at the university hospital who had cancer pain was asked to use the "Itamikei" for 14 days. A graph was printed out and given to both the patient and the medical staff. <BR>The results suggest the following: <BR>1. Using the 0-10 NRS the patient could easily express her level of pain. <BR>2. Because the "Itamikei" was easy to operate, the patient found no difficulty in entering her level of pain. <BR>3. In graph form the daily transition in pain levels can be easily analyzed, and a program for managing pain can be prepare.