ABSTRACT
Objective:In order to analyze the current research status of handover shift in nursing management, summarize, analyze and judge the existing literature, in order to provide reference for clinical nursing practice.Methods:Through literature review, it is planned to review the current situation, shortcomings and future development of nursing handover classes.Results:The handover process was generally divided into four stages, of which SBAR was the best practice tool for handing over key information. For the performance of handover shifts, NASR, PVNC-BR, HES and Handoff CEX were often used to evaluate the performance of shifts, and for the results of shifts, evaluations were mostly conducted at the levels of patient safety, process elements, and organizational management. At present, the use of electronic information systems, benign organizational culture and patient and family-centered clinical practice could effectively improve the efficiency and effectiveness of handover.Conclusions:The process and elements of the current shift mode are relatively complete, and the communication strategy is reasonable, but there are still many shortcomings and defects. This suggests that nursing managers should adopt scientific intervention methods and evaluation tools when paying attention to and reforming nursing handover in the future to continuously improve the quality of handover.
ABSTRACT
@#practice and care environments are important aspects ofnursing care. The use of a reliable and valid scale canmonitor the quality of handover and provide information forcontinuous improvement of practice. This study aims todescribe the perception of nurses, on the domains of qualityof information, efficiency, interaction and support andpatient involvement. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conductedamong 450 nurses from 37 wards in Hospital Kuala Lumpur.Nurses on shift duty were recruited by conveniencesampling from the Medical, Surgery, Obstetrics &Gynaecology, Orthopaedic and Paediatric wards. Using avalidated questionnaire (Handover Evaluation Scale), nursesself-rated their perceptions using a 7-point scale andprovided open-ended responses to the strengths andchallenges that they faced. Descriptive and inferentialanalyses were done while open-ended questions weresummarised based on key themes. Results: A total of 414 nurses completed the survey (92.0%response rate). Nurses had an overall mean (SD) perceptionscore of 5.01 (SD 0.56). They perceived good interaction andsupport during handover and on the quality of informationthat they received, with mean scores of 5.54 (SD 0.79) and5.19 (SD 0.69), respectively. There was an associationbetween the departments where the nurses worked and theiroverall perceptions on nursing handover (p<0.001).Interruptions being the most common theme emerged fromthe open-ended section.Conclusion: Despite having substantial interaction andsupport amongst nurses, opportunities for improvementswere noted. Improvements in the quality of handoverinformation and reducing interruptions should be the mainemphases as these were perceived to be essential in thecurrent handover practices by nurses.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the effects of checklist for nursing handover in emergency department.@*Methods@#A total of 48 emergency department nurses were recruited by convenient sampling method. We implemented nursing bedside handover checklist four months, the quality of the nursing handover and nurses′ mastery of the patients′ condition and the patients′ satisfaction were compared before and after the implementation.@*Results@#After four-month intervention, the score of the nursing handover quality increased from 60.39±3.22 to 67.73±3.09, the difference was statistically significant (t=-14.377, P<0.01). The score of the nurses′ mastery of the patients′ condition increased from 23.89±2.34 to 27.08±1.82, and there was significant difference (t=-7.287, P<0.01). Patients′ satisfaction improved from 91.163% (111/121) to 96.67% (116/120), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.66, P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#Implementation of nursing bedside-handover checklist in emergency department can reduce individual cognitive defects, decrease the information missing of the nursing handover,improve the quality of nursing work and ensure the safety of patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effects of checklist for nursing handover in emergency department. Methods A total of 48 emergency department nurses were recruited by convenient sampling method. We implemented nursing bedside handover checklist four months, the quality of the nursing handover and nurses′ mastery of the patients′ condition and the patients′ satisfaction were compared before and after the implementation. Results After four-month intervention, the score of the nursing handover quality increased from 60.39 ± 3.22 to 67.73 ± 3.09, the difference was statistically significant (t=-14.377, P＜0.01). The score of the nurses′mastery of the patients′condition increased from 23.89 ± 2.34 to 27.08 ± 1.82, and there was significant difference(t=-7.287, P＜0.01). Patients′ satisfaction improved from 91.163% (111/121) to 96.67% (116/120), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.66, P＜0.05). Conclusions Implementation of nursing bedside-handover checklist in emergency department can reduce individual cognitive defects, decrease the information missing of the nursing handover,improve the quality of nursing work and ensure the safety of patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the application and effects of mind map in nursing handover. Methods Two wards which had similar scale, environment, property and level of nursing were randomly chosen as the experimental group and the control group by tossing a coin in Tianjin Hospital of ITCWM Nankai Hospital, 28 nurses were selected in each group, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, control group takes routine handover, the experimental group takes handover by following the guidance of mind map. The mind map of clear mind were designned. The Chinese version of Handover Evaluation Scale was used to evaluate the effects of mind map in the nursing handover, the inpatients'satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group after the application of min-d map. Results After3-month intervention, results showed that the score of handover evaluation scale in the experimental group were (31.39 ± 1.34) points, (19.57 ± 1.23) points, (17.61 ± 1.29) points, (68.57 ± 2.49) point, the score of handover evaluation scale in the control group were (26.71±1.24) points,(18.71±1.33) points,(16.68 ± 1.33) points, (62.11 ± 2.94) points, the difference was statistically significant(t=2.504-13.530, P<0.05);in the experimental group, the score of handover evaluation scale increased significantly than that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-17.450--5.663, P<0.05);the inpatients′satisfaction in the experimental group was 98.89%(89/90), the control group was 90%(81/90) after intervention, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=6.776, P<0.05); in the experimental group, the inpatients′satisfaction was better than that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.211, P<0.05) .Conclusion:The application of mind map in the n-ursing handover can improve the level of nursing handover and the quality of nursing care, contributing to dveloping high quality of nursing service.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the application and effects of mind map in nursing handover. Methods Two wards which had similar scale, environment, property and level of nursing were randomly chosen as the experimental group and the control group by tossing a coin in Tianjin Hospital of ITCWM Nankai Hospital, 28 nurses were selected in each group, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, control group takes routine handover, the experimental group takes handover by following the guidance of mind map. The mind map of clear mind were designned. The Chinese version of Handover Evaluation Scale was used to evaluate the effects of mind map in the nursing handover, the inpatients'satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group after the application of min-d map. Results After3-month intervention, results showed that the score of handover evaluation scale in the experimental group were (31.39 ± 1.34) points, (19.57 ± 1.23) points, (17.61 ± 1.29) points, (68.57 ± 2.49) point, the score of handover evaluation scale in the control group were (26.71±1.24) points,(18.71±1.33) points,(16.68 ± 1.33) points, (62.11 ± 2.94) points, the difference was statistically significant(t=2.504-13.530, P<0.05);in the experimental group, the score of handover evaluation scale increased significantly than that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-17.450--5.663, P<0.05);the inpatients′satisfaction in the experimental group was 98.89%(89/90), the control group was 90%(81/90) after intervention, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=6.776, P<0.05); in the experimental group, the inpatients′satisfaction was better than that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.211, P<0.05) .Conclusion:The application of mind map in the n-ursing handover can improve the level of nursing handover and the quality of nursing care, contributing to dveloping high quality of nursing service.