ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the scheme of assigning rational scores to the Modified Pediatric Nutritional Risk Screening Tool for children with cerebral palsy(CP) at different Gross Motor Function Classification System(GMFCS) levels.Methods:The clinical data of 360 children with CP hospitalized in the Department of Children′s Rehabilitation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January to October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.All the CP children at different GMFCS levels who met the inclusion criteria were subject to nutrition screening and assessment by using the Modified Pediatric Nutritional Risk Screening Tool and the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment(SGNA) scale.The distribution of malnutrition rates assessed by the SGNA scale among the children at different GMFCS levels was examined.Data between groups were compared by the χ2 test.Children at different GMFCS levels were divided into different subgroups according to the statistical difference.Then, 0 or 1 score was assigned to the Modified Pediatric Nutritional Risk Screening Tool in different subgroups, and different combinations were formed.The nutritional risk screening results of different combinations were evaluated by using the SGNA scale assessment results as a reference. Results:In children with CP, the risk detection rate and incidence rate of malnutrition were 58.1%(209/360) and 36.9%(133/360), respectively.There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of malnutrition between GMFCS Ⅱ and GMFCS Ⅲ, as well as between GMFCS Ⅳ and GMFCS Ⅴ(all P>0.05). Therefore, children with CP were divided into 3 subgroups, namely, group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ to Ⅲ, and group Ⅳ to Ⅴ.Different CP disease scores were given to the Modified Pediatric Nutritional Risk Screening Tool in 3 subgroups, forming 3 different protocols[protocol 1 (0, 0, 1 point); protocol 2(0, 1, 1 point); current protocol (1, 1, 1 point)]. Taking the SGNA scale assessment results as a reference, the sensitivity of protocol 1, protocol 2 and current protocol were 85.7%, 92.5%, and 93.2% respectively.The specificity protocol 1, protocol 2 and current protocol were 81.1%, 78.0%, and 62.6%, respectively.And the Youden indexes of above three protocols were 0.668, 0.705, and 0.558, respectively.The Youden index of protocol 2 was relatively high. Conclusions:The Modified Pediatric Nutritional Risk Screening Tool can effectively identify the risk of malnutrition in children with CP.The scheme of assigning 0 points to children with GMFCS grade Ⅰ and 1 point to children with GMFCS grade Ⅱ to Ⅴ is more reasonable.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the effect of nutritional risk screening tool (NRS-2002) upon the clinical efficacy and survival outcomes in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.@*Methods@#Clinical data of 105 LAESCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Nutritional status screening was performed using the NRS-2002 scale. The rate comparison was analyzed by using chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was adopted to calculate the survival rate. Log-rank test was utilized to statistically analyze the differences in survival outcomes. Cox regression model was used for uni-and multi-variate analyses.@*Results@#Prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 37.1% of patients had the nutritional risk. Patients with NRS-2002 score ≥3 had a significantly higher incidence of ≥ grade 3 toxic reactions compared with their counterparts obtaining NRS-2002 score of 1-2(P=0.007). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients were 17.0 and 11.8 months. The OS and PFS of patients with NRS-2002 score ≥ 3 were significantly lower than those of their counterparts obtaining NRS-2002 score of 1-2(both P=0.000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that NRS-2002 score of ≥3 was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.000) and PFS (P=0.001).@*Conclusions@#NRS-2002 tool reveals that patients with esophageal cancer possess a relatively high nutritional risk. Prior to treatment, NRS-2002 score of ≥3 is significantly correlated with an increasing risk of toxic reactions and decreasing survival rate, which is worthy of subsequent investigation.