ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Object: The advantages of biofeedback therapy along with diet in patients with constipation are among the issues discussed nowadays. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 years outcome of biofeedback therapy along with diet in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) (Anismus). Methodology: The focus of this prospective study is a group of 129 patients with ODS constipation, who were referred to two tertiary-care referral academic centers from 2013 to 2016. Patients received biofeedback therapy combined with appropriate diet in cases group and received diet in controls group. Good response was defined as a subject with at least 50 percent improvement from before to after biofeedback therapy on a Cleveland Clinic Florida Constipation Scoring System (CCF). Factors associated with better outcome were analyzed using SPSS 20 software. Results: Out of the 129 patients, 112 patients (86.8%) were female. The mean age of patients was 42.44 ± 15.05 years. The mean CCF score of the patients before and after biofeedback therapy was 12.41 ± 4.39 and 6.00 ± 3.28 respectively in case group (p-value < 0.001). In addition, the mean CCF score of the patients before and after diet therapy was 12.82 ± 4.85 and 9.43 ± 3.79 respectively in control group (p-value < 0.001). While CCF score in both case and control groups reduced significantly after therapy, the rate of this reduction was higher in case group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that biofeedback therapy combined with diet will improve patients outcome in ODS constipation. Prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes are recommend allowing for causal correlations.
RESUMO Objetivo: As vantagens da terapia por biofeedback, juntamente com a dieta, em pacientes com constipação se situam entre os tópicos atualmente em discussão. O objetvo desse estudo foi avaliar os resultados, após 2 anos, da terapia por biofeedback associada à dieta em pacientes com síndrome da defecação obstruída (SDO) (Anismus). Metodologia: O enfoque desse estudo prospectivo é um grupo de 129 pacientes com constipação por SDO, encaminhados a dois centros acadêmicos de referência para atendimento terciário entre os anos de 2013 e 2016. Os pacientes receberam terapia por biofeedback em combinação com dieta apropriada no grupo de estudo (casos), e apenas dieta no grupo de controle. Boa resposta foi deinida como o paciente com pelo menos 50% de melhora desde antes até após a terapia por biofeedback, com o uso de um Sistema de Pontuação para Constipação do Centro Médico Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF). Os fatores associados a melhor desfecho foram analisados com o uso do programa SPSS 20. Resultados: Dos 129 pacientes, 112 (86,8%) eram mulheres. A média de idade dos pacientes era de 4244 ± 15,05 years. O escore CCF médio dos pacientes antes e depois da terapia por biofeedback foi 12,41 ± 4,39 e 6,00 ± 3,28 respectivamente no grupo de casos (P < 0,001). Além disso, o escore CCF médio dos pacientes antes e depois da dietoterapia foi 12,82 ± 4,85 e 9,43 ± 3,79 respectivamente no grupo de controle (P < 0,001). Embora o escore CCF tanto no grupo de casos como no grupo de controle tenha apresentado redução significativa após a terapia, o grau dessa redução foi mais elevado no grupo de casos (P < 0,001). Conclusão: Nossos achados sugerem que a terapia por biofeedback em combinação com a dieta melhora o resultado para os pacientes apresentando constipação por SDO. Recomendamos a realização de estudos clínicos prospectivos com amostras mais expressivas, que permitam o estabelecimento de correlações causais.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Constipation/diet therapy , Constipation/psychologyABSTRACT
Objective To study the therapeutic effect of improved STARR (Sehapayak as a control)in the treatment of moderate and severe rectocele.Methods 70 patients diagnosed with rectocele from Jan.2015 to Oct. 2015 were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups,35 cases in each group.They were treated with either improved STARR or Sehapayak surgery.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain scores, patients'satisfaction and hospitalization days were compared between 2 groups.The ODS scores and therapeutic effects were compared in 1st week,1st month,3rd month and 6th month after treatment.The defecography was implemented and compared between 2 groups before treatment and 1st week and 6th month after treatment.Results The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain scores,hospitalization days and time to return to work were signifi-cantly lower in STARR group than those in Sehapayak group[(29.76 ±8.40)min vs (48.38 ±9.04)min;(14.43 ± 8.16)mL vs (77.80 ±20.58)mL;(4.29 ±1.76)points vs (6.71 ±2.04)points;(6.71 ±1.22)d vs (11.23 ± 3.64)d;(7.20 ±1.36)d vs (13.14 ±2.60)d;t =8.934,16.935,5.338,6.955,11.959,all P 0.05). The ODS score was (20.97 ±4.38)points before treatment,(4.71 ±1.30)points 1week after treatment,(2.94 ± 0.91)points 1month later,(1.68 ±1.04)points 3months later and (0.97 ±0.88)points 6mons later in the observa-tion group.The ODS scores in the control group were (19.88 ±4.09)points,(4.65 ±1.28)points,(3.51 ±1.15) points,(2.88 ±1.67)points,(1.85 ±1.31)points,respectively.The postoperative ODS scores of the two groups of patients were compared with the preoperative decreased significantly (t =20.666,23.904,26.127,26.401,all P 0.05);1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery,the differences of ODS score of the two groups were statistically significant(t =2.313,3.585,323.3,all P 0.05).After treatment,they were all significantly decreased (t =21.779,20.646,all P 0.05).Conclusion Compared with Sehapayak,improved STARR surgery has the advantage of excellent curative effects,less trauma,shorter hospitalization,less complications and higher patient satis-faction.Improved STARR surgery is conducive to the prevention of rectocele relapse.
ABSTRACT
Objetivos: describir un reciente método para evaluar pacientes con síntomas de obstrucción del tracto de salida, y mostrar nuestra experiencia inicial y resultados obtenidos. Material y Métodos: se estudiaron, en el período comprendido entre mayo 2011 y mayo 2013, a pacientes con síntomas de dificultad evacuatoria utilizando la ecografía anorrectal dinámica según la técnica descripta. Los estudios fueron efectuados por 2 operadores entrenados en el método. Resultados: se realizaron 89 ecodefecografías en 88 pacientes, en un período de 24 meses. La ecodefecografía detectó rectocele en el 65% de los pacientes estudiados, seguido de intususcepción y anismo en el 54 y 45%, respectivamente. Conclusión: la ecodefecografía es un método útil para evaluar pacientes con síntomas de obstrucción del tracto de salida. Permite obtener los mismos resultados que la videodefecografía. Es un estudio mínimamente invasivo, evita la exposición a radiación y pone en evidencia todas las estructuras anatómicas involucradas en la evacuación.
Purpose: to describe a novel method to assess Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) and to show the results of our experience. Material and Methods: patients referred with symptoms of ODS between May 2011 and May 2013 were studied by anorrectal dynamic ultrasonography technique. We use the technique of echodefecography described by Murah-Regadas et al. The test was analyzed by two experienced investigators. Results: we performed 89 echodefecography in 88 patients in a period of 24 months. EDF revealed rectocele in 65%, intussusception in 54% and anismus in 45% of patients. Conclusion: echodefecography may be used to assess patients with obstructed defecation, as it is able to detect the same anorrectal dysfunctions found by defecography. It is a minimally invasive, well tolerated method, that avoids exposure to radiation and clearly shows all the anatomical structures involved in defecation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Defecography/methods , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Constipation/diagnosis , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the early outcome of a stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) patients with rectocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: From January to December in 2005, 41 patients with the symptoms of obstructed defecation and the findings of rectocele and rectal intussusception in defecography, who failed in conservative management, were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent the STARR procedure. Preoperatively all patients received colonoscopy, a colon transit time test, cinedefecography, etc. The constipation score was evaluated by using the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score preoperatively and at 1 month and 3 months after operation. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55.3 (19~76) years. There were three males and thirty-eight females. The mean operation time was 39.3 (25~80) minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 4.2 (4~6) days. Complications were fecal urgency in 9 cases (21.9%), which improved after 3 months, bleeding in 5 cases (12.2%), and anastomotic stenosis in 1 case (2.4%). At postoperative defecography, both intussusception and rectocele had disappeared in most patients. All constipation symptoms were significantly improved (P < 0.01). The mean CCF constipation score was 17.6 (11~24) preoperatively, and improved to 9.1 after 1 month and 8.2 after 3 months (P < 0.01). The overall patient satisfaction was graded as excellent, good, fairly good and poor in 19 cases (46.3%), 13 cases (31.7%), 4 cases (9.7%), and 5 cases (12.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The STARR procedure seems to be a safe and effective procedure in ODS patients with rectocele and rectal intussusception. However, further study of the long-term results is required.