Anismus, Physiology, Radiology: Is It Time for Some Pragmatism? A Comparative Study of Radiological and Anorectal Physiology Findings in Patients With Anismus

PURPOSE: Anismus is a functional disorder featuring obstructive symptoms and paradoxical contractions of the pelvic floor. This study aims to establish diagnosis agreement between physiology and radiology, associate anismus with morphological outlet obstruction, and explore the role of sphincteric pressure and rectal volumes in the radiological diagnosis of anismus. METHODS: Consecutive patients were evaluated by using magnetic resonance imaging proctography/fluoroscopic defecography and anorectal physiology. Morphological radiological features were associated with physiology tests. A categorical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, and agreement was assessed via the kappa coefficient. A Mann-Whitney test was used to assess rectal volumes and sphincterial pressure distributions between groups of patients. A P-value of 0.05). The sphincterial straining pressure was 71 mmHg in the anismus group versus 12 mmHg. Radiology was likely to identify anismus when the straining pressure exceeded 50% of the resting pressure (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Radiological techniques detect pelvic morphological abnormalities, but lead to overdiagnoses of anismus. No proctographic pathological feature predicts anismus reliably. A stronger pelvic floor paradoxical contraction is associated with a greater likelihood of detection by proctography.

Difference between Genders in Patients with Obstructive Defecation: Analysis of 1,513 Defecograms

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to find the difference in frequency between genders and to determine the correlation between age-related disease and other diseases in obstructive defecation. METHODS: A consecutive series of 1,513 patients (343 males, 1,170 females) with obstructive defecation who undertook defecography and/or cinedefecography during 1 year period was analyzed. RESULTS: The causes of obstructive defecation in males showed as spastic pelvic floor syndrome (SPFS) (48.3%), rectal prolapse (RP) (31.4%), descending perineum syndrome (DPS) (25.9%), enterocele or sigmoidocele (7.6%), and rectocele (7%). However, in females, the causes were rectocele (83.8%), DPS (49.2%), RP (37.6%), SPFS (32.5 %), and enterocele or sigmoidocele (11.2%). The SPFS was negatively correlated with enterocele or sigmoidocele, DPS, RP in both genders, but SPFS had no statistical correlation with rectocele. DPS was correlated with RP in both genders and with enterocele or sigmoidocele in females, but no statistical correlation was seen in males. The size of the rectocele showed a slight correlation with age in females (r=0.102, P=0.01). Age was correlated with rectal prolapse in females; however, it showed a negative correlation with SPFS in females. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of diseases causing obstructive defecation is different between genders. Age may not play a role in aggrevating the diseases causing obstructive defecation. Further pathophysiologic study of gender differences in patients with obstructive defecation is needed.