ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Se describen los argumentos a partir de los cuales los magistrados de la Corte Constitucional colombiana respaldaron la solución al problema sobre si la estabilidad reforzada se circunscribe a personas calificadas con pérdida de capacidad laboral, e incorporadas al mundo del trabajo mediante contrato laboral; se muestran los argumentos desde los cuales los magistrados de la Corte justificaron su respuesta al asunto sobre si la vulneración a la estabilidad reforzada conlleva la aplicación de las prestaciones fijadas en la Ley 361 de 1997 aún en un contexto de prestación de servicio y sin que el trabajador posea calificación de pérdida de la capacidad laboral; y se concluye que en la sentencia SU-049 de 2017 dichos magistrados actualizaron el alcance del derecho a la estabilidad reforzada acorde con principios constitucionales de igualdad, solidaridad, dignidad y protección de las diferentes modalidades de trabajo, concediendo indemnización de 180 días de salario y reintegro del trabajador sin importar la tenencia del certificado de calificación de pérdida de capacidad laboral ni la forma de vinculación contractual. El enfoque metodológico acogido es hermenéutico.
ABSTRACT Describes arguments on which the magistrates of the Colombian Constitutional Court endorsed the solution to the problem are described as to whether the reinforced stability is limited to qualified people with loss of work capacity and incorporated into the world of work through an employment contract; The arguments from which the judges of the Court justified their response to the matter are shown on whether the violation of the enhanced stability entails the application of the benefits fixed for in Law 361 of 1997 even in a context of service provision and without worker has a qualification of loss of work capacity; and it is concluded that in judgment SU-049 of 2017, said magistrates updated the scope of the right to enhanced stability in accordance with constitutional principles of equality solidarity dignity and protection of the different types of work, granting compensation of 180 days of salary and Reinstatement of the worker regardless of the possession of the qualification certificate of loss of work capacity or the form of contractual relationship. The accepted methodological approach is hermeneutical.
RESUMO Descrevem-se os argumentos com base nos quais os magistrados do Tribunal Constitucional colombiano endossaram a solução do problema, se a estabilidade reforçada se limita a pessoas qualificadas com perda de capacidade laboral e se incorpora ao mundo do trabalho por meio de um contrato; apresentam-se os argumentos com os quais os magistrados do Tribunal justificaram a sua resposta à questão sobre se a violação da estabilidade reforçada implica a aplicação dos benefícios previstos na Lei 361 de 1997, mesmo em contexto de prestação de serviço e sem a trabalhador tem qualificação de perda de capacidade de trabalho; e conclui-se que na sentença SU-049 de 2017, os referidos magistrados atualizaram o âmbito do direito à estabilidade reforçada de acordo com os princípios constitucionais da igualdade, solidariedade, dignidade e proteção dos diversos tipos de trabalho, concedendo indemnização de 180 dias de vencimento e Reintegração do trabalhador independentemente da posse do certificado de habilitação de perda da capacidade de trabalho ou da forma de relação contratual. A abordagem metodológica aceita é hermenêutica.
ABSTRACT
Objective To examine the occupational stability,training needs and capacity building requirements of the general practitioners purposely trained to work in rural communities,for improvement of policies regarding their training and issues related. Methods There counties were selected by stratified random sampling, where general practitioners graduated from such training completed an anonymous questionnaire. Focus group interviews were made to officials of the local Health and Family Planning Commission,those of primary healthcare institutions,and general practitioners themselves. Results The of the 190 valid questionnaires recovered, male accounted for 34. 2% and female 65. 8%. These general practitioners were mostly satisfied with their working environment, social status, work stress and job achievement,yet with lower satisfaction with their salary and availability of medical devices. Consideration of resignation was reported by only 5. 3% of them,with more males than females. As high as 63. 2% of them prefer to work in hospitals of county level. 91. 1% of them held it as necessary to participate in standard resident training,and 98. 4% held it as necessary to have on-job training. 94. 7% of them have participated in further education to gain a bachelor degree in medicine. Conclusions These doctors were found with high stability to work in rural communities and low turnover intention. Further studies are required to encourage these general practitioners to serve rural communities in a long term, and to improve the standard resident training mechanism,and their career development.