ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: Blood pressure (BP) references for Brazilian adolescents are lacking in the literature. This study aims to investigate the normal range of office BP in a healthy, non-overweight Brazilian population of adolescents. Method: The Brazilian Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents (Portuguese acronym "ERICA") is a national school-based study that included adolescents (aged 12 through 17 years), enrolled in public and private schools, in cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, from all five Brazilian macro-regions. Adolescents' height and body mass index (BMI) were classified in percentiles according to age and gender, and reference curves from the World Health Organization were adopted. Three consecutive office BP measurements were taken with a validated oscillometric device using the appropriate cuff size. The mean values of the last two readings were used for analysis. Polynomial regression models relating BP, age, and height were applied. Results: Among 73,999 adolescents, non-overweight individuals represented 74.5% (95% CI: 73.3-75.6) of the total, with similar distribution across ages. The majority of the non-overweight sample was from public schools 84.2% (95% CI: 79.9-87.7) and sedentary 54.8% (95% CI: 53.7-55.8). Adolescents reporting their skin color as brown (48.8% [95% CI: 47.4-50.1]) or white (37.8% [95% CI: 36.1-39.5]) were most frequently represented. BP increased by both age and height percentile. Systolic BP growth patterns were more marked in males when compared to females, along all height percentiles. The same pattern was not observed for diastolic BP. Conclusions: Blood pressure references by sex, age, and height percentiles for Brazilian adolescents are provided.
Resumo Objetivo Referências de pressão arterial (PA) para adolescentes brasileiros estão ausentes na literatura. Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar a variação normal da pressão arterial no consultório em uma população brasileira saudável de adolescentes sem sobrepeso. Método O Estudo dos Riscos Cardiovasculares em Adolescentes (ERICA) é um estudo brasileiro, de âmbito nacional e de base escolar, que incluiu adolescentes (12 a 17 anos) matriculados em escolas públicas e privadas, em cidades com mais de 100.000 habitantes, de todas as cinco macrorregiões brasileiras. A altura e o índice de massa corporal (IMC) dos adolescentes foram classificados em percentis de acordo com a idade e o sexo, sendo adotadas as curvas de referência da Organização Mundial de Saúde. Foram realizadas três medidas consecutivas de PA no consultório com um dispositivo oscilométrico validado, utilizando o manguito de tamanho apropriado. Os valores médios das duas últimas leituras foram utilizados nas análises. Modelos de regressão polinomial relacionando PA, idade e estatura foram aplicados. Resultados Entre os 73.999 adolescentes, os indivíduos sem sobrepeso representaram 74,5% (IC95%: 73,3-75,6) do total, com distribuição similar entre as idades. A maior parte da amostra sem sobrepeso originava-se das escolas públicas, com 84,2% (IC95%: 79,9-87,7), e os sedentários 54,8% (IC95%: 53,7-55,8). Os adolescentes que relataram sua cor de pele como parda (48,8% [IC95%: 47,4-50,1]) e branca (37,8%: [IC 95% 36,1-39,5]) foram os mais representados. A PA aumentou tanto com a idade, quanto com o percentil de altura. Os padrões de aumento sistólico da PA foram mais acentuados no sexo masculino quando comparados ao sexo feminino, em todos os percentis de altura. O mesmo padrão não foi observado para a PA diastólica. Conclusões São fornecidas referências de pressão arterial por sexo, idade e percentil de altura para adolescentes brasileiros.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Cardiovascular Diseases , Reference Values , Blood Pressure , Brazil , Body Mass Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the effects of office blood pressure(OBP)combined with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM)on the diagnosis of hypertension.@*Methods@#The residents aged 35-79 years without hypertension history,whose casual OBP were 120~159 mm Hg/80~99 mm Hg,were enrolled from 4 communities of Hangzhou and Zhuji from 2015 to 2018. They were performed OBP measurements on other two days in 4 weeks and ABPM in a week. There were 2 criteria of OBP as elevated OBP on the first day or in 3 different days,and 4 criteria of ABPM as elevated mean BP in 24 hours, daytime, nighttime and either of the above time. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was employed to evaluate the effects of different OBP criteria combined with ABPM criteria on the diagnosis of masked hypertension(MH)and white-coat hypertension(WCH).@* Results@#Taking 3-day-OBP as a golden standard,the 1-day-OBP with 4 ABPM criteria had the areas under the ROC curve(AUC)of 0.79-0.81,sensitivity of 57.58%-62.77% and specificity of 100.00% in MH;had the AUC of 0.95-0.98,sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 88.96%-96.80% in WCH. The Kappa values were all less than 0.6,known as low consistency. Taking either time of ABPM as a golden standard,24 hours,daytime and nighttime ABPM criteria with OBP had the AUC of 0.90-0.92,sensitivity of 79.17%-83.90% and specificity of 100.00% in MH(all Kappa>0.6),when with 1-day-OBP,the Kappa values were all more than 0.8,known as high consistency;had the AUC of 0.95-1.00,sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 89.54%-99.37% in WCH,the Kappa values of daytime ABPM were all more than 0.6,known as high consistency. @* Conclusions @# If limited by options, 1-day-OBP could be used instead of 3-day-OBP for detection of WCH or exclusion of MH yet with less accuracy; 24 hours or daytime ABPM instead of either time of ABPM was reliable.
ABSTRACT
Objective • To investigate different methods on the diagnosis of white coat and masked phenomena in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods • Information of clinical characteristics and laboratory data were collected, and measurements of office blood pressure (OBP) and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in 274 subjects were performed, including 46 persons with high normal OBP (SBP/DBP 130-139/85-89 mmHg) (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), 187 untreated patients with grade 1 and grade 2 hypertension (SBP/DBP 140-179/90-109 mmHg), and 41 treated hypertensive patients. Differences of 95th and 5th percentile between OBP and daytime ABP, were respectively taken as the cutoff for the definition of white coat phenomenon and masked phenomenon. Results • If white coat and masked phenomenon were diagnosed according to the current hypertension guidelines, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon did not differ between untreated and treated hypertensive patients (11.2% vs 7.3%, P=0.460). In the untreated group, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon was higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 hypertension (20.0% vs 8.5%, P=0.033), whereas the prevalence of white coat hypertension did not differ (2.2% vs 7.0%, P=0.230). The prevalence of masked hypertension was 73.9% in high normal blood pressure group. The prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension was 4.9%. If the difference of 95th percentile (≥20.50/20.50 mmHg) and 5th percentile (≤-18.67/-6.00 mmHg) between OBP and daytime ABP were, respectively, used as the cutoff for the definition of white coat and masked phenomenon, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon did not differ between treated and untreated groups (12.2% vs 9.1%，P=0.543). In the untreated group, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon was higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 hypertension (24.4% vs 4.2%, P=0.000). The prevalence of masked phenomenon did not differ between persons with high normal OBP (15.2%) and untreated (5.9%) as well as treated hypertensive patients (12.2%) (P>0.05). Conclusion • The percentile methods may be useful for the diagnosis of white coat and masked phenomena.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure measurements taken at home by physicians, nurses, and patients with office blood pressure measurement , ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure measurement. METHODS: A total of 44 patients seen by a home care program were studied. Protocol 1 a) blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician and a nurse during a regular home visit (Home1); b) home blood pressure measurement was measured for 4 days (HBPM1); c) office blood pressure measurement was measured by a physician, a nurse, and the patient; and by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Protocol 2 blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician, and a nurse during a special home visit in the presence of a physician and a nurse only (Home2); and b) home blood pressure measurement was taken for the second time (HBPM2). Echocardiography, guided by a two-dimensional echocardiograph, was performed. RESULTS: Protocol 1: a) office blood pressure measurement and Home1 were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, except for systolic and diastolic office blood pressure measurement taken by the patient or a family member, systolic blood pressure taken by a nurse, and diastolic blood pressure taken by a physician. b) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and HBPM1 were similar. Protocol 2: a) HBPM2 and Home2 were similar. b) Home2 was significantly lower than Home1, except for diastolic blood pressure taken by a nurse or the patient. There were significant relationships between: a) diastolic blood pressure measured by the patient and the thickness of the interventricular septum, posterior wall, and left ventricular mass; and b) ambulatory and HBPM2 diastolic and systolic blood pressure taken by a physician (home2) and left ventricular mass. Therefore, the data indicate that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic values relative to "office...
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Home Care Services , Hypertension/diagnosis , Physicians' Offices , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Echocardiography , Hypertension/psychology , Multivariate AnalysisABSTRACT
Objective To verify the reliability of home blood pressure measurement in clinic and research works by comparison three methods[home(H),office(O) and ambulatory(A)]of blood pressure(BP) measurements. Methods The"study-effects of salt substitution on blood pressure among the hypertensive patients and their families"was a randomized,double blinded control trial.In this study,BP was measured in 220 hypertensive patients using office,home and ambulatory BP measurements concurrently at the baseline and the end of the intervention. Two hundred seventeen patients had baseline eligible data,while at the end of the intervention,only 189 patients had eligible data.Bland-Altman method and Person's correlation analysis were used to compare the agreement of BP levels by 3 methods,and McNemar chi-square test compared rates of the agreement,assuming the ambulatory as the reference.Results The mean BP levels using office,ambulatory and home BP measurements were 149.5?16.4/87.2?9.5 mm Hg,137.8?17.1/83.2?10.3 mm Hg,and 138.0?14.2/82.4?9.3 mm Hg,respectively. H BP was more strongly related with ambulatory BP(SBP/DBP)(H:r=0.55/0.62 vs O:r= 0.36/0.46).The difference of BP between H and A was smaller[H:A—0.2 mm Hg/—0.7 mm Hg vs O:A(ll.7 mm Hg/4.0 mm Hg)].Intra-individual agreement between H and A SBP was significantly higher than that between O and A(28.3%vs 16.5%for≤|5| mm Hg and 49.7%vs 33.5%for≤|10| mm Hg,all P0.05).Conclusion Home and ambulatory BP was more strongly related and better agreement than office-ambulatory BP measurement.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To investigate the possibie difference, if any, between office blood pressure(BP) and home BP may be important in the diagnosis and treatment of hypersensive patients. This report deails the difference between the two BP's and the usefulness of digital electronic sphygmomanometer(DES) for self-monitoring of home BP. METHODS: The BP's of 14 patients with essential hypertension were measured with mercury sphygmomanometers at outpatient department by physician and with DES at home(twice a day) by the patients. Patients were followed up every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and previous 2 weeks' average home BP's were compared with the office BP's of each 2 weeks' end. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between office and home BP(both systolic and diastolic) ; office average BP(151/95mmHg) was higher than home average BP(136/86mmHg). CONCLUSION: Caution may be needed in the interpretation of office BP unless it is measured several times after adequate rest.