ABSTRACT
Periprosthetic infection is a catastrophic complication after joint replacement. Choosing appropriate treatment for patients with different infection characteristics is the key to improve the success rate. The one-stage revision has been applied and studied more and more in clinical work because of its advantages in treatment cycle, functional recovery, complications and cost. Grasping the indications and contraindications, comprehensive analysis and selection of appropriate patients, considering intraoperative details and postoperative anti-infection treatment meticulously, are crucial to reduce the recurrence rate of infection. The purpose of this paper is to describe the main points of the one-stage revision in the treatment of periprosthetic infection, and to summarize the classic and recent research on the one-stage revision.
ABSTRACT
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after artificial joint replacement, and its diagnosis and treatment has always been a great challenge in the field of orthopedics. At present, the treatment strategies for PJI include suppressive antibiotic therapy, debridement antibiotics irrigation of the retained, prosthesis, one-stage revision, two-stage revision, arthrodesis, amputation, and biotherapy, etc. Conventional treatment can not achieve satisfactory results. As a new treatment mode, biotherapy has unique advantages in PJI treatment. This article reviews the risk factors and the source of infection, diagnosis, classification and treatment strategies of PJI, in order to provide valuable reference for clinical treatment of PJI.
ABSTRACT
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as an insurmountable challenge has always represented a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. Accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment of PJI are the keys to deal with this challenge.The diagnosis of PJI is mainly based on clinical manifestations, joint fluid biochemistry, pathogen culture and biomarkers at present. New pathogen culture methods and specific biomarkers in recent years are hot topics in PJI research. In terms of treatment, two-stage revision is still considered to be the 'gold standard’ protocol. However, more and more centers around the world have begun to accept and try one-stage revision as a treatment for PJI.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the overall failure rate of one or two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infections in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the predictors affecting the outcome of exchange.Methods Thirty-nine cases received one or two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections after primary TKA in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and Southeast Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University from January 2012 to November 2014 were reviewed.Periprosthetic tissue and articular fluid of all patients were analyzed by bacterial culture.All patients were followed up for more than one year.C-reactive protein (CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),procalcitonin (PCT) and blood routine were tested every four weeks,and the evaluation on pain,total periprosthetic function,range of motion and deformation of arthroplasty were conducted.Differences between groups were analyzed using chi-square test or Student's t test when appropriate.A stepwise selection approach in logistic regression analysis was used to screen key predictors for outcome of one or two-stage exchange for infections in TKA.Results There were 39 patients who had undergone one or two-stage exchange for infections in TKA,including 20 males (51.3％) and 19 females (48.7％) with an average age of (62.4±11.7) years.Among the 39 patients,18 gram-positive strains were isolated from specimens,and 6 gram negative strains,2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 1 candida albicans.Ten of 39 reimplantations developed reinfection.Between the success and failure groups,there were significant differences in the time from primary TKA to revision (P =0.023),operative time (P =0.029),multidrug resistant organisms (P =0.045),the preoperative and post-operative ESR (P=0.002 and P＜0.001,respectively) and post-operative CRP (P=0.018).Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that time from primary TKA to revision (OR =0.96,95％CI:0.92-1.00,P=0.025),preoperative ESR (OR=0.97,95％CI:0.95-1.00,P=0.045) and post-operative ESR (OR =0.94,95％ CI:0.91-0.98,P =0.002) were independent indicators associated with the outcome of one or two-stage revision.Conclusions The failure rate after revision for infected TKA is relatively high.The time from primary TKA to revision,preoperative and post-operative ESR could predict the outcome of one or two-stage revision effectively.
ABSTRACT
Objectives To compare the effect of one-stage revision and two-stage revision for the treatment of culture-negative peripros-thetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.Methods A retrospective study was conducted with the clinical data of 41 patients who had chronic periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty and then underwent one or two-stage revision surgery from February 2006 to February 2014.The patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical way,namely the 16 patients who received the one-stage revision surgery were regarded as the OSR group,and the other 25 cases who underwent the two-stage revision surgery were regarded as the TSR group.The clinical efficacy of the two surgical way were assessed with Harris Hip score,visual analogue scale (VAS),and rate of infection clearance.Results The average duration of follow up was 29.7 months (9 to 48 months).At the last follow-up,Harris Hip score of TSR group was higher than that of the OSR group,and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.04),and the VAS score of TSR group was lower than that of the OSR group with statistical differences (P =0.02).Additionally,the rate of infection clearance in TSR group was significantly higher than OSR group (P =0.04).Conclusion Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection can be effectively controled by one or two-stage revision surgery.However,patients got a better prognosis after two-stage revision surgery.