Comparison of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy with Open Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumor / 대한내시경복강경외과학회지

PURPOSE: The definite indications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and the limitations of minimally invasive surgery have yet to be determined. To verify the benefit and safety of LA, we compared the results of LA with those of open adrenalectomy (OA) and we further analyzed the clinical results of LA in accordance with the time period of performing this surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 69 patients who received adrenalectomy between 1997 and 2008. We compared LA with OA. The LA was divided into subsets of the early and late groups, and the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach groups, and we compared and analyzed the results of each group, along with the results of the OA and LA groups. For each of the groups, we analyzed the following factors; age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, the operative time, the time under anesthesia, the amounts of blood loss and transfusion, the time to first oral intake, the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the complications. RESULTS: LA (25 cases), as compared to OA (20 cases), showed better results for the amount of transfusion, the time to first oral intake, the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the complication rates (p=0.032; p=0.017; p=0.02). As for CA (4 cases), the time to first oral intake and the length of the postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer than that of LA (p=0.001; p=0.021). LA done in the late period demonstrated less blood loss and a shorter time to first oral intake as compared to the LA of the early period (p=0.032; p=0.019). There were no significant statistical differences between the results of the peritoneal or retroperitoneal approaches. CONCLUSION: LA has the merits of a shortening hospital stay and decreased complication. Furthermore, as the experience with this type of surgery accumulates, these merits are likely to become stronger. Thus, surgeons are expected to carefully decide on choosing the surgical methods by fully understanding the benefits and indications of LA.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Adrenalectomy / 대한내분비외과학회지

PURPOSE: Advancements in technology and surgical skill have extended the applications of minimally invasive surgery, and various studies have suggested that laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) might lead to better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery. We reviewed our experience in order to evaluate the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy (OA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 41 patients who underwent surgery for adrenal lesions between 1998 and 2006. Outcome measurements included gender, age, diagnosis, lesion size, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, procedure-related complications, time to first oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: There were 19 LAs and 22 OAs. There were no significant differences in gender, age, lesion location (right or left), comorbidity, complications, or postoperative hospital stay. The mean operative time was longer in the LA group than in the OA group (OA 215, LA 273 min, P=0.048). Resumption of oral intake occurred at 3.4 days in the OA group and at 1.9 days in the LA group (P<0.001), and the incidence of bleeding that required transfusion was 58% in the OA group and 21% in the LA group (P=0.018). We divided the LA group into 14 pure LAs (pLA) and 5 conversions from laparoscopic procedures to open adrenalectomy (CA). Significant postoperative complications occurred in the OA, pLA, and CA groups at rates of 18%, 14%, and 80%, respectively (OA vs pLA, P=0.569 pLA vs CA, P=0.017 OA vs CA, P=0.017), and postoperative hospital stays were 11.1, 5.7, and 19.6 days for each group, respectively (OA vs pLA, P=0.005 pLA vs CA, P<0.001 OA vs CA, P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent pLA had similar postoperative complications, but shorter hospital stays and shorter times to first oral intake compared to OA. Patients in the CA group had longer operative times, longer postoperative hospital stays, and significantly higher rates of variable complications compared to the pLA and OA groups. Careful preoperative selection of patients for LA is important to avoid unnecessary CA.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Resection of Pheochromocytoma

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard treatment for benign adrenal neoplasm because of the procedure's minimal invasiveness and the patients' earlier recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for treating pheochromocytoma. METHODS: 19 Operations were performed between March 1993 and July 2004 at Kyung-Hee medical center for treating pheochromocytoma, and the diagnosis was confirmed by the postoperative pathology. There were 5 cases treated with LA and 14 cases treated with open adrenalectomy (OA). The various clinical parameters (tumor location, tumor size, first oral feeding, hospital stay, hemodynamic change and operation time) were compared between the LA and OA procedures, retrospectively. RESULTS: The location of the tumor was 2 : 2 : 1 (left : right : extra-adrenal) in the LA group and 9 : 3 : 2 (left : right : both) in the OA group. The mean tumor size (cm) was 5.4 in the LA group and 6.3 in the OA group. The mean operation time (minutes) was 219 in the LA group and 202 in the OA group. The resumption of liquid diet (days) was 2.2 in the LA group and 3.0 in the OA group (P=0.037). The postoperative hospital stay (days) was 6.3 in the LA group and 8.5 in the OA group. The mean number of intraoperative hypertensive crisis was 1.42 in the LA group and 1.40 in the OA group. The number of cases requiring intraoperative transfusion was 2 of 5 in the LA group and 2 of 15 in the OA group. The use of antihypertensives (number of times) was 1.42 in the LA group and 1.40 in the OA group. The mean highest BP (mmHg) was 162 in the LA group and 165 in the OA group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for treating pheochromocytoma is a safe and effective procedure that provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

A Clinical Review of 11 Cases of a Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison with an Open Adrenalectomy / 대한내분비외과학회지

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the golden standard procedure for adrenal tumors because of its many advantages. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes for patients who underwent a transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with those of patients who had a conventional open adrenalectomy. Similar to the open adrenalectomy, the laparoscopic adrenalectomy was divided into anterior (LA: Laparoscopic anterior) and posterior (LP: Laparoscopic posterior) approaches. METHODS: Between January 1991 and September 1998, a retrospective review of consecutive adrenalectomies performed at Kyung Hee University Hospital was done. Outcome measurements of operative indications, tumor size, operation time, first oral intake, postoperative stay, and postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven(11) laparoscopic adrenalectomies (4 LAs and 7 LPs) were performed in 11 patients and 47 open adrenalectomies [24 with an anterior, OA (Open anterior), approach and 23 with a posterior, OP (Open posterior), approach] in 43 patients. The LA approach showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (1.8 vs 3.4 days p=0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (5.5 vs 12.8 days p=0.001) compared to the OA approach. The LP approach also showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (0.9 vs 1.6 days p=0.046) and postoperative hospital stay (5.9 vs 9.9 days p=0.004) compared to the OP approach. There were no differences in tumor size, operation time, and postoperative complications between laparoscopic adrenalectomies and open adrenalectomies. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy is superior to the open adrenalectomy when performed by appropriately trained and skilled surgeons.

A Clinical Review of 11 Cases of a Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison with an Open Adrenalectomy / 대한내분비외과학회지

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the golden standard procedure for adrenal tumors because of its many advantages. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes for patients who underwent a transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with those of patients who had a conventional open adrenalectomy. Similar to the open adrenalectomy, the laparoscopic adrenalectomy was divided into anterior (LA: Laparoscopic anterior) and posterior (LP: Laparoscopic posterior) approaches. METHODS: Between January 1991 and September 1998, a retrospective review of consecutive adrenalectomies performed at Kyung Hee University Hospital was done. Outcome measurements of operative indications, tumor size, operation time, first oral intake, postoperative stay, and postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven(11) laparoscopic adrenalectomies (4 LAs and 7 LPs) were performed in 11 patients and 47 open adrenalectomies [24 with an anterior, OA (Open anterior), approach and 23 with a posterior, OP (Open posterior), approach] in 43 patients. The LA approach showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (1.8 vs 3.4 days p=0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (5.5 vs 12.8 days p=0.001) compared to the OA approach. The LP approach also showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (0.9 vs 1.6 days p=0.046) and postoperative hospital stay (5.9 vs 9.9 days p=0.004) compared to the OP approach. There were no differences in tumor size, operation time, and postoperative complications between laparoscopic adrenalectomies and open adrenalectomies. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy is superior to the open adrenalectomy when performed by appropriately trained and skilled surgeons.

A Clinical Review of 11 Cases of a Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Comparison with an open adrenalectomy

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the golden standard procedure for adrenal tumors because of its many advantages. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes for patients who underwent a transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with those of patients who had a conventional open adrenalectomy. Similar to the open adrenalectomy, the laparoscopic adrenalectomy was divided into anterior (LA: Laparoscopic anterior) and posterior (LP: Laparoscopic posterior) approaches. METHODS: Between January 1991 and September 1998, a retrospective review of consecutive ad renalectomies performed at Kyung Hee University Hospital was done. Outcome measurements of operative indications, tumor size, operation time, first oral intake, postoperative stay, and postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven(11) laparoscopic adrenalectomies (4 LAs and 7 LPs) were performed in 11 patients and 47 open adrenalectomies [24 with an anterior, OA (Open anterior), approach and 23 with a posterior, OP (Open posterior), approach] in 43 patients. The LA approach showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (1.8 vs 3.4 days p=0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (5.5 vs 12.8 days p=0.001) compared to the OA approach. The LP approach also showed a significantly shorter time to first oral intake (0.9 vs 1.6 days p=0.046) and postoperative hospital stay (5.9 vs 9.9 days p=0.004) compared to the OP approach. There were no differences in tumor size, operation time, and postoperative complications between laparoscopic adrenalectomies and open adrenalectomies. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic adrenalectomy is superior to the open adrenalectomy when performed by appropriately trained and skilled surgeons.