ABSTRACT
Three methods to become a member of PubMed Commons and the ways to add, reply and share reviews using PubMed Commons were described in order to help its users to master how to use it, and the significance of PubMed open reviews was pointed out.
ABSTRACT
Improvement of the review of dissertation for doctoral degree is important for the training of qualified doctors.Current practice includes double-blind review and open review.This paper compares and analyses the outcome of the two kinds of reviews and found that double-blind review is more objective that the other(the mean of open review score is 96.39±2.069,the mean of double-blind review score is 85.18±6.635.P=0.001,P＜0.01).In the end some suggestions are proposed to improve the double-blind review system.