Orbital Implant Infection after Drilling Procedure

PURPOSE: To report the severity of orbital implant infection related to a drilling procedure and to provide a foundation for reevaluating this procedure. METHODS: We investigated retrospectively 17 patients who were suspected of orbital implant infection and whose infected implants were ultimately removed. In these patients, increased mucopurulent eye discharge and implant exposure after the drilling procedure were observed. We attempted to treat them with topical and systemic antibiotics, but the discharge and implant exposure did not improve. RESULTS: Of the 17 removed implants, 13 were hydroxyapatite and 4 were Medpor(R). The pegs used were plastic pegs in 12 cases and titanium pegs in 5 cases. The average duration from the first orbital implant insertion to drilling was 10.2+/-5.3 months. The average duration from drilling to severe infection symptoms was 37.0+/-30.0 months. The average duration from the onset of symptoms to implant removal was 12.9+/-12.6 months. The mean follow-up period after final surgery was 15.4 months. In most cases, the deep portions of the removed implants were fragile, malodorous, and filled with pus. Acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrations were observed in the pathological examinations, and H. influenzae, S. aureus, S. viridans were identified. They did not receive any drilling procedure thereafter and no infection or inflammatory sign was subsequently observed. CONCLUSIONS: Drilling and pegging can cause unexpected, severe complications such as orbital implant infection, in which the infected implant has to be removed to be cured. Therefore, before performing a drilling procedure doctors should carefully consider the patient's preferences and urgent needs.

A Case of Orbital Abscess following Porous Orbital Implant Infection

PURPOSE: We present a case of orbital abscess following porous orbital implant infection in a 73-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Just one month after a seemingly uncomplicated enucleation and porous polyethylene (Medpor(R)) orbital implant surgery, implant exposure developed with profuse pus discharge. The patient was unresponsive to implant removal and MRI confirmed the presence of an orbital pus pocket. Despite extirpation of the four rectus muscles, inflammatory granulation debridement and abscess drainage, another new pus pocket developed. RESULTS: After partial orbital exenteration, the wound finally healed well without any additional abscess formation. CONCLUSIONS: A patient who has risk factors for delayed wound healing must be examined thoroughly and extreme care such as exenteration must be taken if there is persistent infection.