Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements with Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry, Orbscan System and Ultrasound Pachymeter

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry (OLCR) corneal thickness measurements compared with the Orbscan system and ultrasound pachymeter (IOPac, Mentor). METHODS: Two examiners measured corneal thicknesses of 78 normal eyes and in 36 eyes that had undergone LASIK, and five sequential measurements of corneal thickness with OLCR, Orbscan system, Mentor, and IOPac were performed. Remeasurements of corneal thickness in 24 normal eyes were performed after two days to investigate intra-examiner reproducibility. RESULTS: The average corneal thickness measured in normal subjects was 536.3+/-23.8 micrometer in OLCR, 542.4+/-25.3 micrometer in the Orbscan system, 535.4+/-23.7 micrometer in Mentor, and 534.2+/-24.1 micrometer in IOPac. The average corneal thickness measured in patients who had undergone LASIK was 487.3+/-30.8 micrometer in OLCR, 492.5+/-36.5 micrometer in the Orbscan system, 487.5+/-30.8 micrometer in Mentor, and 485.3+/-30.8 micrometer in IOPac. There was no statistically significant difference between the four pachymeters. The inter-examiner and intra-examiner reproducibilities were shown to be highly reliable. CONCLUSIONS: The OLCR showed similar measurments of corneal thickness with the Orbscan system and ultrasound pachymeter, and showed no difference in reproducibility with different examiners.

Orbscan System for Measurement of Corneal Thickness

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of Orbscan system in measuring corneal thickness before refractive surgery, the authors conducted a comparative study of Orbscan system and ultrasonic pachymeter in their agreement and repeatability. METHODS: 84 patients (168 eyes) who were examined between December, 2000 and March, 2001 were divided into two groups: those who exceeded -6.00 D, and those who did not. Orbscan and ultrasonic pachymeter were employed. Correlation and regression were analyzed to assess their agreement. The repeatability was measured by analyzing mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval of each method. RESULTS: The average central corneal thickness was 542.3+/-34.2micro meter by Orbscan system, and 528.6+/-29.7micro meter by ultrasonic pachymeter. Correlation coefficient was nearly 1 between them, and therefore we obtained statistically significant linear regression equation. In the analysis of repeatability, 95% confidence interval of Orbscan system was -17.2micro meter~+11.8micro meter which was superior to the interval of ultrasonic pachymeter (-23.2micro meter~+14.4micro meter). CONCLUSION: Orbscan system measurements of corneal thickness was greater than ultrasonic pachymeter measurements by 9 to 19 m. Because Orbscan system also showed superiority in repeatability, it may be a useful method in the clinical field.