Endoscopic management of Urolithiasis on a pediatric patient with a solitary kidney and an Ileal conduit

@#Management of nephrolithiasis in patients with urinary diversions pose a unique therapeutic challenge for the following reasons: 1) retrograde ureteral access is difficult to perform through a bowel diversion and 2) percutaneous renal access becomes challenging because of inability to do a retrograde pyelogram. For this reason, image-guided access through a combined ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance are both necessary. This clinical problem becomes even more complicated when dealing with a solitary functioning kidney. Treatment should be precise in order to avoid any complications that may progress to renal failure. Presented here is a 15-year-old male adolescent who had previously undergone a radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit for a rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder last 2008, and complained of flank pain, fever and foul-smelling urine. Imaging studies showed left obstructive hydronephrosis with ureterolithiasis and nephrolithiasis, and an atrophic contralateral kidney. A preliminary nephrostomy tube drainage was done to recover renal function, followed later by percutaneous endoscopic stone management. Discussed here are the challenges involved in his therapy as well as the advantages of a stepwise approach including the short-term outcomes.

Hydroperitoneum: A unique complication of Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on an Ectopic Solitary Pelvic Kidney

@#A 47-year-old male complained of anuria for 2 days with elevated creatinine of 14 mg/dL on admission. Patient underwent emergent hemodialysis. Non-contrast CT showed a solitary ectopic pelvic kidney with a 2 cm. pelvolithiasis and a 1 cm upper pole calyceal stone with obstructive hydronephrosis. He therefore underwent ultrasound-guided nephrostomy tube placement. Once clinically stable, the patient underwent a multi-tract supine PCNL. Intraoperatively, the authors noted tense abdominal distention accompanied by hypotension during the procedure. A diagnosis of compartment syndrome secondary to hydroperitoneum was considered. An indwelling stent and a nephrostomy tube were placed. An abdominal pigtail drain was placed removing three liters of fluid. The patient remained intubated for 3 days. He underwent blood transfusion. He required two 2 sessions of hemodialysis postoperatively. The patient was discharged in stable condition on postoperative day 22. Hydroperitoneum is a potential complication of PCNL in ectopic pelvic kidneys. Its prompt recognition, followed by immediate aspiration of intraabdominal fluid and drain placement is life-saving.

Nefrolitotricia percutánea ambulatoria: nuestra experiencia en 156 casos / Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Our experience in 156 cases

OBJETIVOS: analizar y presentar nuestros resultados en el tratamiento de la litiasis renal mediante Nefrolitotricia Percutánea (NLP) ambulatoria en un mismo centro. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: entre agosto de 2013 y mayo de 2017 se realizó una recolección prospectiva de datos de los pacientes sometidos a NLP ambulatoria tubeless con catéter doble J o totally tubeless por litiasis renal. Se excluyeron aquellos pacientes con score de ASA >3. Se analizaron los datos preoperatorios, intra- y posoperatorios. Se clasificaron las complicaciones de acuerdo con el sistema de Clavien modificado. Se compararon los valores de hematocrito, hemoglobina, creatininemia y uremia pre- y posoperatoria a las 48 horas. RESULTADOS: en total, se operaron 156 pacientes, a los cuales se les dio el alta el mismo día de la cirugía. La suma de los diámetros máximos de las litiasis, en promedio, fue de 26,6 mm, 32 casos de litiasis coraliforme. La posición más utilizada fue la ventral, con un tiempo promedio de cirugía de 50 minutos. Se realizó NLP tubeless en 125 pacientes y totally tubeless en 29 casos. A 40 pacientes se les colocó un tapón de Surgicel en el tracto de acceso percutáneo. La tasa libre de cálculos fue del 84%, y en pacientes con litiasis coraliforme fue del 53%. No hubo complicaciones intraoperatorias y el 80% de los pacientes no presentó complicaciones. La tasa de reinternación fue del 3%. Si bien se hallaron diferencias significativas entre los valores pre- y posoperatorios de hematocrito y hemoglobina (40% y 13,3 g/dl vs. 39% y 12,8 g/dl; p=0,0001 y 0,0001, respectivamente), estas no fueron clínicamente significativas y solamente un paciente requirió de transfusión de sangre (0,6%). CONCLUSIONES: en nuestra experiencia, la NLP ambulatoria fue segura, con tasas libres de cálculos y complicaciones similares a las realizadas con internación.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and feasibility of ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) at a single institution. METHODS: Data collected prospectively of patients submit for ambulatory PCNL tubeless or totally tubeless between August 2013 and May 2017 were review. Exclusion criteria were patients with ASA score >3. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Complications were classified using the Clavien sistem modified for PCNL. Properative and 48hs postoperative value of hematocrit, hemoglobin, creatininemia and uremia were compare. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty five patients underwent ambulatory PCNL. All patients were discharge the same day of surgery. The median of the sum of the maximum stone diameter was 26,6mm, 32 patients had staghorn calculus. We performed the majority of the surgerys in ventral position with a median time of 50 minutes. One hundred and twenty five patients underwent tubeless PCNL and totally tubeless 29 patients. In 40 cases we used Surgicel for sealing the percutaneous tract. Overall stone-free rate was 84% and 53% in staghorn cases. There were no intraoperative complications and 80% of the patients did not have any complications. Readmission rate was 3%. There was a significant decrease in the postoperative hematocrit and hemoglobin level (40% y 13,3 g/dl vs. 39% y 12,8 g/dl; p=0,0001 y 0,0001), this was not clinically significant. Only one patient required blood transfusion (0,6%). CONCLUSION: Ambulatory PCNL is safe with a stone-free rate, readmisions and complications similar to standard PCNL.

Analysis of risk factors for pulmonary complications in patients undergoing Upper Pole Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (uPPCNL): A single center experience

INTRODUCTION@#To determine the risk factors contributing to pulmonary complications among patients who undergo upper pole prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (uPPCNL). This will serve as a guide to urologists who utilize uPPCNL among their patients, so that they may monitor them more closely for these events.@*METHODS@#A retrospective chart review was done on all patients who underwent uPPCNL from January 2015 to December 2017. Patient characteristics (age, gender, BMI, co-morbidity) and stone demographics (Stone size, Guy’s Stone score, laterality, stone location) were summarized as well as intraoperative parameters inclusive of operative time, number of tracts, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Point biserial correlation and Pearson Chi-square for independent tests were used to identify the independent predictors of pulmonary complications.@*RESULTS@#Nine hundred ninety-two patients underwent uPPCNL during the study period. Fifty-two (5.2%) had pulmonary complications. Sixty-seven pulmonary complications were tallied because some had two complications at one time. The most common was pleural effusion 35(48%), followed by atelectasis in 16(30%), hospital-acquired pneumonia 14(27%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome 2(4%). Forty-one (78.8%) and 11(21.2%) required medical and surgical interventions, respectively. Higher Guy’s stone scores, larger stone size, and longer hospital stay were significant predictors for developing pleural effusion. Patients with higher preoperative serum creatinine and longer hospital stay were significantly associated with surgical management (p < 0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The incidence of pulmonary complications after uPPCNL is low and only a minority need surgical management. When risk factors are present, these patients need to be monitored closely so that a timely intervention may be done to avoid life-threatening consequences.

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: its current place in the management of renal pelvis stones

Background: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is assumed to preserve functional renal parenchyma, and there is a limited risk for immediate or late renal hemorrhage. Therefore, it might be an alternative for the patients in whom maximal preservation of renal parenchyma is necessary. In the present study, we aimed to compare the success rate and perioperative complications of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. In the present study, we aimed to document and compare the success rate and perioperative complications of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy with published literature about percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of all patients subjected to laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (18 cases) in the Department of General Surgery at SMIMER Hospital (tertiary care centre), Surat between the period of January 2014 to December 2018. Record of all patients were assessed for demographic profile, co morbidities, routine blood investigations, including RFT, urine cytology and culture sensitivity, specialized investigation as X-ray KUB, USG KUB, IVP/CT-Urography, DTPA scan, all patients were called for follow up evaluation with radiological, clinical and RFT studies at regular intervals upto 3 months.Results: LP is considered a successful alternative therapy for PCNL in selected cases with large renal stones like those in the extra renal pelvis in patients without a history of previous surgery. In addition, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) can be considered as a reasonable therapeutic option for large staghorn calculus which cannot be removed with a reasonable number of access and sessions of PCNL.Conclusions: Our results show that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is equally good or better as compared to PCNL in selected cases.

A Randomised Prospective Analysis of Effectivness of ESWL vs PCNL in Renal Stone Size 1-2 cm and Review of Literature

Introduction: Majority of renal stones diagnosed todayare below 2 cm. The preferred treatment of <1cm stone isextracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) while standardof care for renal stone >2 cm is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The procedure of choice for 1-2 cm renalstones is still a subject of debate. This study was undertakento formulate a better understanding of management of renalstones of size 1-2cm in this patient populationMaterial and methods: A prospective study was carried outto evaluate clearance of ESWL vs PCNL in patients with renalstones of size 1-2 cm. Complete follow up data were availablefor 281 patients 140 in PCNL and 141 in ESWL group, 12patients were lost to follow up.Results: Both the groups were well matched with regards toage and sex distribution. 141 patients underwent ESWL and103/141(73%) patients had stone clearance in 1-3 months. 140patients underwent PCNL out of which 133 (95%) patientshad stone clearance. Complications were mostly minor andfound in 9.7% in patients undergoing ESWL while same wereseen in 30% of those undergoing PCNL.Conclusion: The primary objective in stone management istotal stone clearance. Considering this as priority PCNL hasproved superior to ESWL in our study for renal stones 1-2 cmin size. It has also got lower auxiliary and retreatment rates buthas its own share of complications and longer hospital stay areother important factors in PCNL.

Supine PCNL (sPCNL): Challenging the “standard” prone (pPCNL)

@#Recently, the global endourology scene has witnessed a resurgence of interest in supine PCNL (sPCNL). The number of urologists who are attracted to this “simplified method” of PCNL is growing and its promoters are suggesting to abandon the standard prone approach. Debates on the two positions have become commonplace in endourology scientific meetings. The advocates consistently emphasize that when compared to the prone position, sPCNL has multiple advantages for the surgeon, the anesthesia team and the patient. In spite of these, it is evident that many still favor prone PCNL (pPCNL) because of its time-tested proven efficacy and safety. In fact, up to this present day, majority of PCNLs are still done in the prone position. This review article intends to analyze the “current state of affairs” of the two PCNL positions, describing their advantages and disadvantages. Presently, applying the principles of “what is safe and efficacious in one’s hands” dictates the choice of which technique is utilized to treat a patient. Conversely, it is more clinically sound if this choice was made instead, in consideration of, the interplay of the following factors such as the patient’s clinical demographics, the anatomical features of the renal collecting system, the stone burden and characteristics and ultimately, the physician’s training, skills and experience.

Balloon dilatation combined with pneumatic and ultrasound lithotripsy in the treatment of unilateral renal stones by percutaneous nephrolithotomy / 上海交通大学学报（医学版）

Objective: To investigate the application effect of balloon dilatation and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) combined with pneumatic and ultrasound lithotripsy on the clinical treatment of unilateral kidney stones. Methods: Ninety-four patients with unilateral kidney stones who accepted PCNL in the Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June 2017 to July 2019, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into group A and group B. Among them, 68 patients (group A) were subjected to balloon dilatation combined with pneumatic and ultrasound lithotripsy, while 26 patients (group B) underwent fascia dilatation combined with holmium laser lithotripsy. The clinical effects of two kinds of lithotripsy on the treatment of unilateral kidney stones were compared. Results: The operation time was shorter in group A than that in group B [(107.82±10.87) min vs (115.41±10.68) min, P=0.003]. The increase rate of postoperative white blood cell (WBC) was lower in group A than that in group B (4.41% vs 23.08%, P=0.018). The fever ( ≥ 38.5 ℃ ) rate was lower in group A than that in group B (4.41% vs 23.08%, P=0.018). There were no significant differences in hemoglobin reduction, WBC count, hospital stay, stone-free rate, blood transfusion rate and perforation rate of collection system between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Balloon dilatation combined with pneumatic and ultrasound lithotripsy in treatment of unilateral renal stones by PCNL can shorten the operation time, and reduce the increase rate of postoperative WBC and fever rate, which is worthy of being promoted in the clinical treatment of patients with unilateral kidney stones.

Effect Of Body Mass Index On Results Of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy In The Treatment Of Lower Calyceal Stone >2cm

Background: This work was intended to distinguish the results of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) related to stone-free rates (SFR) by the varying body mass index (BMI) of the patients who subjected for lower calyx stone treatment (with a stone range of ≥2 cm). Materials and methods:Atotal of 287 patients who went through the PCNLfor kidney stones were selected for the study. Only patients treated at Shahid-Ghazi Hariri Surgical Specialties Hospital (Medical City) and Al-Qima Private Hospital (Baghdad) within the time frame of January 2015 to April 2018 selected for the study. Information on patients' BMI and SFR was collected and analyzed to compare and contrast the differences in obese patients. Results: The average age and BMI of the patients are 41 years old and 34kg/m2 respectively. For total mean stone size 2.2 cm. Besides that, the average value for height was 173cm and weight 101kg. The overall stone-free rate was 82% and the mean hospital stay was 115±51.21 min, Major complications were seen in 65 patients (22.6%). No statistically significant differences were found in SFR, age and stone side among the four groups. The stone-free rates (SFRs) of a single procedure for the groups were 85%, 79.3%, 79%, and 84%, respectively. Major complications were not observed either during or after the operations. Conclusion: The effectiveness of PCNLtreatment for removal of lower calyceal stone is influenced by the varying patients' BMI value and results in high SFR value

Comparison of standard and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi: a prospective randomized control trial

Background:In the current era of minimally invasive interventions, the mainstay of treatment of renal stones larger than 2cm is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL underwent various evolutionary changes minimizing morbidity to the patients. We prospectively compared the outcome of tubeless PCNL (without nephrostomy drainage tube) to reduce the pain and discomfort caused by tube with standard PCNL in the treatment of renal stones.Methods:In this randomized control trial (RCT), we divided patients satisfying the inclusion criteria of consenting for trial, single access puncture, less than 3 stones each less than 3 cm, operative duration of less than 2 hours into two groups, standard PCNL (group 1) and tubeless PCNL (group 2) with 25 patients each. Randomization and group assignment were done after complete clearance of renal stones.Results:Patient‟s age, gender, sides of stone and stonesize were comparable between two groups (standard versus tubeless PCNL). Postoperative hemoglobin drop, bleeding, pyrexia, urine leak, and blood transfusion requirement did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Analgesic requirement (190mg versus 80 mg of tramadol), operative duration (49.80 min versus 38.60 min), postoperative pain score (6/10 versus 3.64/10-visual analog scale) and duration of hospital stay (68.48 hours versus 41.12 hours) showed statistically significant difference favoring tubeless PCNL.Conclusions: Tubeless PCNL may be a safe, acceptable and effective modality of treatment for renal calculi in carefully selected patients comparing standard PCNL resulting in less operative duration, lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic requirementand shorter hospital stay

Prospective Study Of 200 Cases Of Staghorn Calculus- A Single Centre Experience.

Background: Staghorn stones are large branching stones that fill the renal pelvis and renal calyces and they can be complete or partial depending on the occupancy of the collecting system. . PCNL is a demanding procedure mainly for staghorn stones and may require multilple percutaneous tracts or multilple sessions of PCNL for complete clearance of stones. Hence ; we planned the present study to analyse patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn calculi. Material and Methods: In present study 200 patients underwent PCNL for the treatment of staghorn kidney stones. After exclusion criteria patients were selected and underwent standard PCNL. Preoperative , Intraoperative and Postoperative data was collected. Results: Out of 200 patients 95 (47.5%) were males and 105 (52.5%) patients were females. 120 patients (60%) were diagnosed with partial staghorn calculi whereas 80(40%) patients were diagnosed as complete staghorn Calculi. 37.5% patients were rendered stone free through single access port whereas 62.5% required multiple access port for PCNL in which 57.5% needed 2 access ports, 3% needed 3 access ports and only 2% needed 4 access ports for PCNL. 24 (12%) patients required 2nd stage procedure for residual stones and 1 (0.5%) patient become stone free after 3rd stage PCNL. Bleeding requiring blood transfusion was the most common complication in 21% patients. Whereas fever, hemothorax, hydrothorax, paralytic ileus were encountered in 12%,0.5%,0.5% and 4% patients respectively. Conclusion: For staghorn calculus PCNLis safe and effective procedure with acceptable morbidity and without mortality. Now PCNLhas almost replaced the open surgeries like pyelolithotomy , nephrolithotomy . with experience staghorn calculus can now be managed by minimum invasive technique like PCNL with no scar , no risk of incisional hernia , lesser hospital stay and minimum morbidity compared to open procedures

Evaluación de protocolo de bajas dosis en radioscopía para nefrolitotomía percutánea. Comparación de resultados y seguridad en un estudio prospectivo y randomizado / Evaluation of low dose protocol in fluoroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comparison of results and safety in a prospective randomized study

INTRODUCCIÓN: Tradicionalmente, durante la Nefrolitotomía Percutánea (NPL), la radioscopía se efectúa en modo Continuo a 10 FPS (imágenes por segundo). Existe escasa experiencia en la literatura urológica sobre disminución de dosis de radiación durante la radioscopía y su efecto en el éxito de la NPL (eficacia y seguridad). Series de casos, demuestran resultados similares usando radioscopía en modo Pulsado (1-4 FPS), determinando un Tiempo de Radioscopía inferior al modo Contínuo. Dichas experiencias no son basadas en diseños randomizados, ni reportan Dosimetría Directa. Hipótesis: usando radioscopía pulsada, se logran iguales resultados y con igual seguridad, que con radioscopía Contínua, y con exposición a radiación significativamente más baja. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo, randomizado, ciego simple y experimental (aprobado por Comité de Ética). Muestra de 19 pacientes, entre Abril y Agosto de 2017. De forma aleatoria, aproximadamente la mitad de los pacientes fueron sometidos a NPL con radioscopía Contínua (10 FPS) y la otra mitad con modalidad Pulsada (2 FPS). Intervenidos en el mismo establecimiento, con 1 trayecto, utilizando el mismo equipo de Radioscopía. Se registró Dosimetría Directa, Tiempo de Radioscopía, resultado (Stone Free) y complicaciones, en cada procedimiento. El análisis estadístico se realizó con medidas de tendencia central, se verificó distribución normal de la muestra y comparación de variables mediante t-Test, con intervalo de confianza del 95 por ciento. RESULTADOS: En 8 pacientes se utilizó radioscopía Contínua, y en 11, radioscopía Pulsada. La Dosimetría del grupo radioscopía Contínua promedió 2,7 mSv, para radioscopía Pulsada el promedio fue 3,1 mSv. El Tiempo de Radioscopía del grupo radioscopía Contínua fue de 286,4 s, del grupo radioscopía Pulsada fue de 365,7 s. Ambas diferencias no son estadísticamente significativas (p 0,6 y p 0,3 respectivamente). En relación al Resultado y Complicaciones, no hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Para los pacientes estudiados a la fecha, no se demuestra beneficioso realizar radioscopía Pulsada: la Dosimetría Directa y el Tiempo de Radioscopía fueron mayores en el grupo de modalidad Pulsada. Nuestros resultados son diferentes a lo reportado en la literatura, lo cual hace necesario evaluar el impacto de esta intervención, y considerar otros factores que pudieran influir (AU)

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), fluoroscopy is performed in Continuous mode at 10 FPS (images per second). There is little experience in the urological literature on the reduction of radiation dose during fluoroscopy and its effect on the success of the PCNL (efficacy and safety). Several case show similar results, using Pulsed radioscopy (1-4 FPS), determining a Radioscopy Time inferior to the one in Continuous mode. These experiences are not based on randomized designs, nor do they report Direct Dosimetry. Hypothesis: using pulsed fluoroscopy, the same results are obtained and equally safe than with Continuous radioscopy and with exposure to significantly lower radiation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, randomized, simple and experimental blind study (approved by the Ethics Committee). Sample of 19 patients, between April and August 2017. Randomly, approximately half of the patients underwent PCNL with continuous radioscopy (10 FPS) and the other half with Pulsed modality (2 FPS). They were intervened in the same establishment, in one journey, using the same Radioscopy equipment. Direct Dosimetry, Radioscopy Time, and complications results (Stone Free) were registered in each procedure. The statistical analysis was performed with central trend measures, normal distribution of the sample was verified and comparison of variables by t-Test, with 95 % confidence interval. RESULTS: Continuous fluoroscopy was used on eight patients, and Pulsed radioscopy on eleven. The Dosimetry of the Continuous fluoroscopy group averaged 2.7 mSv. Pulsed fluoroscopy average was 3.1 mSv. The Radioscopy Time of the Continuous fluoroscopy group was 286.4 s. Pulsed radioscopy group time it was 365.7 s. Both differences are not statistically significant (p 0.6 and p 0.3 respectively). In relation to the Result and Complications, there were no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of Pulsed Radioscopy benefits are not shown in the patients studied to date: Direct Dosimetry and Radioscopy Time were greater in the Pulsed modality group. Our results are different from those reported in the literature, which makes it necessary to evaluate the impact of this intervention, and consider other factors that could influence.(AU)

A Clinical Analysis of 554 Cases of Partial Tubeless mPCNL / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To summarize the experience of partial tubeless mPCNL. Methods A retrospective analysis of partial tubeless mPCNL surgery experience from January 2010 to December 2016. Atotal of 1320 patients underwent mPCNL surgery in these 7 years.Out fo those 1320 patients,554 patients underwent partial tubeless mPCNL,766 patients underwent standard mPCNL,and 85 exception cases of standard mPCNL were forced to abort surgery due to maximum surgery time of 2 hours and different complications such as bleeding, infections and etc, so total of 681 patients with standard mPCNL were compared with partial tubeless mPCNL.Results The rate of partialtubeless mPCNL has increased by 84% in 2016, with an indication of tubeless mPCNL being extended, while the complication rate showed no increase. Compared with the standard mPCNL, there was no significant dif-ference between the two groups in the rate of stone removal, drop in mean hemoglobin, blood transfusion and postoperative fever. There were significant differences in postoperative analgesic use rate (5%:21%,P=0.001) and hospitalization stay (2.5:4.5d,P=0.001) . The rate of postoperative bleeding complications in partial tubeless group and standard group is 1.1%and 2.5%respectively, but difference is not statistically significant. There were 1cases of urinary extravasations in the partial tubeless group which was treated by perirenal drainage, antibiotic treatment, and 1 cases of pleural injury, which were treated by open exploration, and chest tube placement. Conclusion In compared to standard mPCNL partial tubeless mPCNL significantly increased patients postoperative comfort, shorten hospital stay,and no complications increased.Partial tubless mPCNL is a safe and practicable procedure.

Analysis of the Skin to Calyceal Distance (SCD) to the upper pole calyx among Filipino patients: A guide to upper pole access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> Precise entry to the upper posterior calyx is key to a successful and safe upper pole access PCNL. The surgeon's knowledge of the average skin to calyceal distance can serve as a guide to avoid inadvertent injury to both the kidney and collateral organs during the percutaneous puncture.<br /><strong>METHODS:</strong> The authors analyzed the radiologic images of 84 patients who underwent unenhanced 64-slice helical CT scan (Toshiba®). Skin-to-calyceal distance (SCD) to the upper posterior calyx were measured using the Vitrea® software inherent to the CT scan.<br /><strong>RESULTS:</strong> The mean SCDs is non-hydronephrotic kidneys were 54.9 ± 13.7 mm and 61.4 ± 12.5 mm on the right and left, respectively while in hydronephrotic kidneys, the mean SCDs were 60.3 ± 11.8 mm and 58.6 ± 13.1 mm on the right and left, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left upper pole SCD in both groups (p = 0.84).<br /><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> The mean SCD to the upper posterior calyx among Filipino adults is about 6.0 cm. By limiting the depth of the initial puncture to within the distance, the endourologist may avoid overshooting the targeted calyx, thus avoiding undue injury to the kidney or intraabdominal structures.</p>

The comparative study of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal pelvic stone / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP) and the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in treating renal pelvic stone.Methods The data of 89 patients diagnosed as renal pelvic stone were retrospectively reviewed from January 2009 to July 2016,of whom 43 patients underwent RLP and 46 underwent PCNL.Statistical analysis was performed regarding operation time,blood loss,mean hospital stay,complication rate,and stone-free rate.Results The operation time in RLP group and PCNL group was (117.5 ± 16.7) min and (118.3 ± 16.6) min,respectively,and there was no significant difference (P =0.547).For the two groups,the mean hospital stay was (4.5 ± 0.5) d and (6.1 ± 0.9) d,the mean hemoglobin decrease was (4.5 ± 1.2) g/L and (18.1 ± 3.4) g/L,the post-operative blood transfusion rate was 2.3％ and 14.0％,the post-operative septic shock rate was 0 and 9.3％,respectively,with significant difference between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).The stone-free rate in both groups was 97.7％ and 95.3％ with no significant difference (P =0.557).Conclusions RLP has the advantages of quick recovery,less blood loss and lower complication rate than PCNL.It could be a minimally invasive option for the treatment of renal pelvic stone.

Risk factors associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in China:A Meta-analysis / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To explore the risk factors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome crisis (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in China. Methods Databases of CNKI, CBM, WanFan and VIP were searched to retrieve studies about systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy to October, 2016. Results 18 studies involving 5,323 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:a) univariate analysis indicated that renal insufficiency [O(R) =2.78, 95%CI (1.96 to 3.95), P = 0.000], preoperative positive urine culture [O(R) = 3.41, 95%CI (1.89 to 6.15), P = 0.000], preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive [O(R) = 3.78, 95%CI (3.02 to 4.72), P = 0.000], diabetes mellitus [O(R) = 2.14, 95%CI (1.33 to 3.45), P = 0.002], pelvic positive urine culture [O(R)= 5.14, 95%CI (2.46 to 10.73), P = 0.000] and operation time ≥120 min [O(R) = 2.31, 95%CI (1.40 to 3.82), P = 0.001] were the risk factors of SIRS; b) multivariate analysis showed that, preoperative positive urine culture [O(R) = 6.83, 95%CI (2.82 to 16.57), P = 0.000], preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive [O(R) = 5.43, 95%CI (3.51 to 8.41), P = 0.000], diabetes mellitus [O(R) = 2.85, 95%CI (1.45 to 5.58), P = 0.002], pelvic positive urine culture [O(R) = 4.30, 95%CI (1.30 to 14.21), P = 0.020] and operation time ≥120 min [O(R) = 2.72, 95%CI (1.62 to 4.59), P = 0.000] were the independent risk factors of MCAT. Conclusion The independent risk factors of SIRS for patients after PCNL are diabetes mellitus, preoperative positive urine culture, preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive, pelvic positive urine culture and operation time. However, due to the quantity and low quality of the included literature, the conclusion needs the support from high quality studies.

Risk factors associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in China:A Meta-analysis / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To explore the risk factors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome crisis (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in China. Methods Databases of CNKI, CBM, WanFan and VIP were searched to retrieve studies about systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy to October, 2016. Results 18 studies involving 5,323 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:a) univariate analysis indicated that renal insufficiency [O(R) =2.78, 95%CI (1.96 to 3.95), P = 0.000], preoperative positive urine culture [O(R) = 3.41, 95%CI (1.89 to 6.15), P = 0.000], preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive [O(R) = 3.78, 95%CI (3.02 to 4.72), P = 0.000], diabetes mellitus [O(R) = 2.14, 95%CI (1.33 to 3.45), P = 0.002], pelvic positive urine culture [O(R)= 5.14, 95%CI (2.46 to 10.73), P = 0.000] and operation time ≥120 min [O(R) = 2.31, 95%CI (1.40 to 3.82), P = 0.001] were the risk factors of SIRS; b) multivariate analysis showed that, preoperative positive urine culture [O(R) = 6.83, 95%CI (2.82 to 16.57), P = 0.000], preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive [O(R) = 5.43, 95%CI (3.51 to 8.41), P = 0.000], diabetes mellitus [O(R) = 2.85, 95%CI (1.45 to 5.58), P = 0.002], pelvic positive urine culture [O(R) = 4.30, 95%CI (1.30 to 14.21), P = 0.020] and operation time ≥120 min [O(R) = 2.72, 95%CI (1.62 to 4.59), P = 0.000] were the independent risk factors of MCAT. Conclusion The independent risk factors of SIRS for patients after PCNL are diabetes mellitus, preoperative positive urine culture, preoperative routine urine leucocyte positive, pelvic positive urine culture and operation time. However, due to the quantity and low quality of the included literature, the conclusion needs the support from high quality studies.

Analysis of the Skin to Calyceal Distance (SCD) to the upper pole calyx among Filipino patients: A guide to upper pole access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

OBJECTIVE: Precise entry to the upper posterior calyx is key to a successful and safe upper pole access PCNL. The surgeon's knowledge of the average skin to calyceal distance can serve as a guide to avoid inadvertent injury to both the kidney and collateral organs during the percutaneous puncture.METHODS: The authors analyzed the radiologic images of 84 patients who underwent unenhanced 64-slice helical CT scan (Toshiba®). Skin-to-calyceal distance (SCD) to the upper posterior calyx were measured using the Vitrea® software inherent to the CT scan.RESULTS: The mean SCDs is non-hydronephrotic kidneys were 54.9 ± 13.7 mm and 61.4 ± 12.5 mm on the right and left, respectively while in hydronephrotic kidneys, the mean SCDs were 60.3 ± 11.8 mm and 58.6 ± 13.1 mm on the right and left, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left upper pole SCD in both groups (p = 0.84).CONCLUSION: The mean SCD to the upper posterior calyx among Filipino adults is about 6.0 cm. By limiting the depth of the initial puncture to within the distance, the endourologist may avoid overshooting the targeted calyx, thus avoiding undue injury to the kidney or intraabdominal structures.

Analysis of the etiology and prognosis of severe complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To analyze the etiology and prognosis of severe complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Methods The clinical data of patients with severe complications after PCNL from December 2004 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Age of the patients ranged from 25 to 69 years old,with an average of 41 years.There were 64 cases with 29 male and 35 female.Fifty-five cases were diagnosed as renal calculi,including 21 cases of left renal calculi,19 cases of right renal calculi;15 cases of bilateral renal calculi;2 cases of the patients were bilateral upper ureteral calculi;7 patients were renal calculi upper ureteral calculi on the other side.In all cases,the maximum diameter of calculus was 1.8-4.3 cm (mean 2.6 cm) and hydronephrosis depth was 0-5.9 cm (mean 2.3 cm);15 cases were previously treated with nephrolithotomy.The modified Clavien grading system was used to evaluate surgical complications,and ≥grade Ⅲ complications were considered as serious complications.Results Among the 64 cases,28 cases were classified as Clavien Ⅲ class.There were 2 cases of bleeding in operation due to renal parenchyma laceration or multiple access,patients were treated with later open surgery.Postoperative bleeding were revealed in 22 cases,16 of which were hemorrhage from the nephrostomy tubes,4 of which complained of discontinuity gross hematuria and 2 postoperative bleeding were encountered during the nephrostomy tube remove.All the cases received renal arteriography and were diagnosed with pseudoaneurysm,bleeding were stopped after embolization.3 cases of pleural injury were treated with closed thoracic drainage,1 colon injury was treated with open colostomy.There were 32 cases of urinary sepsis considered as Clavien Ⅳ complications,and these patients were transferred to the Intensive Care Unit.Clavien Ⅴ class 4 cases:1 died of hemorrhagic shock due to pleural injury,2 cases died of urinary sepsis and multiple organ failure and another case died of pulmonary embolism.Conclusions PCNL has high risk of serious complications,which should be always strictly follow the principles.Adequate preoperative preparation,appropriate surgery access,carefully and gently operate,appropriate antibiotic use and postoperative management are the key measures to reduce the incidence of complications.

Comparison and analysis of advantages and disadvantages of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of renal multiple stones or staghorn calculi / 中国内镜杂志

Objective Comparing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of renal multiple stones or staghorn calculi. Methods 80 patients of renal multiple stones and staghorn calculi from May 2012 to March 2015 were randomly divided into two groups, group A: flexible ureteroscopy as adjuvant technique of balloon dilatation to establish standards channel of rigid nephrolithotripsy, group B: rigid ureteroscopy as auxiliary to flexible ureteroscopy nephrolithotomy. Clinical data of the two groups including operative time, blood loss, stones clearance rate, hospital stay and other indicators of surgical complications were comparatively analyzed. Results TAll the patients received successful surgical procedures. The operation time in group A was 50.4 min, gravel time was 25.6 min, while operation time in group B was 90.3 min, gravel time was 70.3 min. The differences between the two groups was statistically significant. Other indicators such as blood loss, stones clearance rate, complication rate showed no statistical significance. Conclusion Combined techniques of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy was proceeded widely to improve stone clearance rate when dealing with multiple stones and staghorn calculi, while rigid-ureterscopy-based combination has advantages of shorter operation time and this combination should be promoted in top units.