Short-term efficacy of pectopexy in the treatment of middle pelvic defects / 中国实用妇科与产科杂志

OBJECTIVE: To explore the short-term clinical effect and safety of pectopexy in the treatment of female middle pelvic defects.METHODS: Collect the clinical data and follow-up information of 32 patients,who underwent pectopexy due to pelvic prolapse with POP-Q score aboveⅡ in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from August 2018 to January 2019.The objective clinical efficacy and the results of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 questionnaires for pelvic floor dysfunction were evaluated by comparing the locations of Aa,Ba,Ap,Bp,C and TVL indicators of quantitative pelvic organ prolapse(POP-Q)scale before operation,1 month and 3 months after operation.RESULTS: The 32 patients completed pectopexy in 52-75 minutes,the average time being(59.22 ± 29.21)minutes;intraoperative bleeding was 10-400 mL,the average being(83.75 ± 78.89)mL;indwelling catheter days were 1-5 days,the average being(2.24±0.83)days;residual urine was 0-100 mL,the average being(32.79±29.81)mL;postoperative hospitalization days were 5-12 days,the average being(7.41±1.59)days.There was 1 case(3.13%)of asymptomatic venous thrombosis in the lower extremity during the perioperative period and 1 case(3.13%)of hypostatic pneumonia,and they were cured after active treatment.No complications occurred in the otherpatients during the perioperative period.During the follow-up period,pelvic discomfort occurred in 1 case(3.13%),which was relieved after active treatment,andno complications occurred in the rest of the patients.There was no significant difference(P>0.05)between TVL preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 3 months[(7.94±0.84)cm vs.(7.73±0.60)cm vs.(7.61±0.58)cm].There were significant differences in Aa[(0.94±1.92)cm vs.-(2.81±0.40)cm vs.-(2.81±0.40)cm],Ba[(2.28±2.62)cm vs.-(2.78±0.42)cm vs.-(2.78±0.42)cm],Ap[-(2.00±1.41)cm vs.-(2.92±0.26)cm vs.-(2.91±0.30)cm],Bp[-(0.91±2.78)cm vs.-(2.25±0.44)cm vs.-(2.25±0.44)cm]and C[(3.58±2.47)cm vs.-(7.72±0.58)cm vs.-(7.56±0.58)cm]among the other indicators(P<0.05).There were significant differences in PFIQ-7[(77.56±40.87)vs.(7.87±10.92)]and PFDI-20[(68.55 ± 35.05)vs.(7.66 ± 6.50)]scores before and 3 months after operation(P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Pectopexy provides new ideas and options for the treatment of pelvic defects.At present,large sample data and longterm follow-up are still needed to further observe the long-term efficacy.

Impact of Sacrospinous Colpopexy Associated with Anterior Colporrhaphy for the Treatment of Dome Prolapse on all Three Vaginal Compartments / Resultados da colpofixação sacroespinal associada a colporrafia anterior para o tratamento do prolapso de cúpula vaginal

Objective To evaluate the results of sacrospinous colpopexy surgery associated with anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of women with post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Methods This prospective study included 20women with vault prolapse, PelvicOrgan Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) stage≥2, treated between January 2003 and February 2006, and evaluated in a follow-up review (more than one year later). Genital prolapse was evaluated qualitatively in stages and quantitatively in centimeters. Prolapse stage < 2 was considered to be the cure criterion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test (paired samples) to compare the points and stages of prolapse before and after surgery. Results Evaluation of the vaginal vault after one year revealed that 95% of subjects were in stage zero and that 5% were in stage 1. For cystocele, 50% were in stage 1, 10% were in stage 0 (cured) and 40% were in stage 2. For rectocele, three women were in stage 1 (15%), one was in stage 2 (5%) and 16 had no further prolapse. The most frequent complication was pain in the right buttock, with remission of symptoms in all three cases three months after surgery. Conclusions In this retrospective study, the surgical correction of vault prolapse using a sacrospinous ligament fixation technique associatedwith anterior colporrhaphy proved effective in resolving genital prolapse. Despite the low complication rates, there was a high rate of cystocele, which may be caused by posterior vaginal shifting due to either the technique or an overvaluation by the POP-Q system.

Objetivo Avaliar os resultados da cirurgia de colpofixação sacroespinal associada a colporrafia anterior, para o tratamento de mulheres com prolapso de cúpula vaginal pós-histerectomia. Métodos Estudo prospectivo que incluiu 20 mulheres com prolapso de cúpula em estágio≥2 de acordo com o Sistema de Quantificação do Prolapso Genital (POP-Q) tratadas no período de janeiro de 2003 a fevereiro de 2006 e avaliadas emrevisão tardia (maior que um ano). O prolapso genital foi avaliado qualitativamente em estágios e, quantitativamente, emcentímetros. Como critério de cura, consideramos prolapso em estágio < 2. Para análise estatística, foi utilizado teste de Wilcoxon (amostras pareadas) para comparar os pontos e estágios dos prolapsos antes e depois da cirurgia. Resultados Na cúpula vaginal a avaliação após um ano mostrou 95% em estágio zero e 5% em estágio 1. Cistocele: 50% em estágio 1, 10% em estágio zero (curadas) e 40% emestágio 2. Retocele: trêsmulheres apresentavamestágio 1 (15%), uma emestágio 2 (5%) e dezesseis não apresentavam prolapso posterior. As complicações mais frequentes foramdor no glúteo direito com remissão do sintoma emtodos os três casos após três meses da cirurgia. Conclusões Neste estudo retrospectivo, a cirurgia de correção do prolapso de cúpula pela técnica de fixação no ligamento sacroespinal, associada à colporrafia anterior, se mostrou efetiva na resolução do prolapso genital com baixa taxa de complicações; porém com alta taxa de cistocele - o que pode ter sido decorrente do desvio vaginal posterior pela técnica, ou ainda uma supervalorização pelo sistema POP-Q.

Ultrasound Characteristics of Patients with Urinary Stress Incontinence with or without Genital Prolapse

PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of women with urinary stress incontinence (USI) with or without genital prolapse (GP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 268 patients who underwent ultrasound perineal evaluation were divided into two groups: isolated USI (n=132) and USIGP (n=136) with USI/GP stage I/II. The latter group was additionally divided into two subgroups: USIGP(A) (n=78) with USI/GP stage I and USIGP(B) (n=58) with USI/GP stage II. RESULTS: Point Aa (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system), which is the projection of the bladder neck (BN) on the anterior vaginal wall, was situated higher in the rest position (RP) but moved lower during a Valsalva maneuver (VM) in the USI group than in the USIGP group (pV and angle of rotation (rho), which were significantly higher in the USI group than in the USIGP group during VM. CONCLUSIONS: According to the clinical and ultrasound findings, we can conclude that the BN is situated higher during the RP but moved lower during a VM in patients with isolated USI compared with those with concomitant USI/GP, which could be explained by the cystocele-immobilizing effect on the BN during the VM in the latter group but also by the deteriorated pubo-urethral ligaments in the former group.

Diagnosis and treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse / 대한산부인과학회지

Pelvic organ prolapse is defined anatomically as the descent of a pelvic organ into or beyond the vagina, perineum or anal canal. As a society is industrialized and the average span of life is increased, there are a growing numbers and concerns with pelvic organ prolapse. It can endanger our quality of life not only by a specific mechanical symptom, such as bulge outside the vagina, but by functional symptoms like bladder, bowel and sexual problems. Growth in demand for services to care for pelvic organ prolapse generates a demand for objective diagnostic tool and successful treatment strategies. So, first, we would like to discuss the POP Q system which is by far the most often used by clinicians and researchers since it's adoption in 1996, and second, we would like to compare the types, characteristics, success rates, and recurrence rates of two broad categories of prolapse management, nonsurgical treatment, which includes pelvic floor muscle training and pessary use, and surgery for anterior, apical and posterior vaginal wall defects.