ABSTRACT
Background and purpose:Checkpiont targeted immunotherapy in the field of solid tumor therapy has huge potential, triggering a boom in the study of immune targeted drugs. A study has provided a basis for the follow-up study of ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients. This study counted the adverse event statistics that ipilimumab or placebo combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for the treatment of stage Ⅳ or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma to evaluate the safety of ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma.Methods:This study selected 13 patients with ECOG scores≤1 and stage ⅣA or ⅣB squamous cell carcinoma in the Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni-versity. Randomized controlled double blind trial was used in this study. The patients of experimental group were treated with ipilimumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin, while the patients of control group were treated with the placebo combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Adverse events (AEs) were counted in the process of treatment.Results:The most common AEs were the 1/2 grade AEs. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) reported in the ipilimumab group included level Ⅰ of diarrhea and pruritus, level Ⅱ of rash and pruritus and level Ⅲ of hypophysitis.Conclusion:The side effects of ipilimumab were mild, tolerable and manageable.
ABSTRACT
<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences between therapeutic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) cycles and prophylactic G-CSF cycles in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.<br><b>Material and Method:</b> Medical records of 15 women who received paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer between January 2003 and December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All 15 patients completed 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin as the first-line chemotherapy. The complications were compared between therapeutic G-CSF cycles and prophylactic G-CSF cycles.<br><b>Results:</b> The number of chemotherapy cycles correlated with the ratio of prophylactic G-CSF cycles. It was considered that earlier prophylactic G-CSF injections were chosen due to a gradual decrease in WBC and neutrophil counts. The WBC and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in prophylactic G-CSF cycles than in therapeutic G-CSF cycles. However, there were no significant differences in the intervals of chemotherapy, delay of chemotherapy, and incidence of febrile neutropenia between the therapeutic G-CSF and prophylactic G-CSF cycles.<br><b>Conclusion:</b> Prophylactic G-CSF injections were not effective in preventing the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to investigate the differencesbetween therapeutic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) cycles and prophylacticG-CSF cycles in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy forovarian cancer.<br><b>Material and Method:</b> Medical records of 15 women who received paclitaxel andcarboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer between January 2003 and December2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All 15 patients completed 6 cycles of paclitaxel andcarboplatin as the first-line chemotherapy. The complications were compared betweentherapeutic G-CSF cycles and prophylactic G-CSF cycles.<br><b>Results:</b> The number of chemotherapy cycles correlated with the ratio ofprophylactic G-CSF cycles. It was considered that earlier prophylactic G-CSF injectionswere chosen due to a gradual decrease in WBC and neutrophil counts. The WBC and neutrophilcounts were significantly higher in prophylactic G-CSF cycles than in therapeutic G-CSFcycles. However, there were no significant differences in the intervals of chemotherapy,delay of chemotherapy, and incidence of febrile neutropenia between the therapeutic G-CSFand prophylactic G-CSF cycles.<br><b>Conclusion:</b> Prophylactic G-CSF injections were not effective in preventingthe incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatincombination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.