ABSTRACT
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common and critical complication after pancreatic body and tail resection. How to effectively reduce the occurrence of pancreatic fistula and conduct timely treatment thereafter is an urgent clinical issue to be solved. Recent research standardized the definition of pancreatic fistula and stressed the correlation between POPF classification and patient prognosis. According to the literature, identification of the risk factors for pancreatic fistula contributed to lowering the rate of the complication. Appropriate management of the pancreatic stump and perioperative treatment are of great significance to reduce the rate of POPF in clinical practice. After the occurrence of POPF, the treatment of choice should be determined according to the classification of the pancreatic fistula. However, despite the progress and promising treatment approaches, POPF remains to be a clinical issue that warrants further studies in the future.
ABSTRACT
Carcinoma of pancreatic body and tail is a high invasive disease with a low resectability rate.It was once believed that celiac axis infiltration usually contraindicated resection.Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) is described as a new treatment method of this disease.In recent years,more and more literatures have reported this operation,but they were case reports or small sample retrospective study,the results of which differed according to the different treatments and perioperative managements in different centers.The advantages and disadvantages of DP-CAR are still controversial.Research progress of DP-CAR is reviewed in this article.
ABSTRACT
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine how to preserve the remaining pancreatic body and tail in the pancreatectomy. Methods In seven cases of pancreatectomy, three of them were the rupture of pancreatojejunal anastomosis, and four of them were the pancreatectomy for tumor in the pancreatic neck or body. During operations, a bridge internal drainages was used to drain the pancreatic juice into the adjacent jejunum. After the operations, the supportive treatment, continuous irrigation of peritoneal cavity and pancreatic enzyme inhibition were used. Results In all seven patients, the remaining pancreatic body and tail were successfully preserved. The endocrine functions of these patients recovered to nearly normal level and patients were discharged. Conclusions In preserving the remaining pancreatic body or tail, the bridge internal drainage has its advantage of convenience. It effectively preserves the exocrine of pancreas as well as its endocrine