ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate whether the use of our novel patient-specific guide (PSG) with 3-dimensional reconstruction in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) would allow accurate and reliable implantation of the glenoid and humeral components. METHODS: 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. The PSG group (n=10) and conventional group (n=10) was evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of implant positioning between before and after surgery on the computed tomography image. RESULTS: The superoinferior and anteroposterior offset in the glenoid component were 0.42 ± 0.07, 0.50 ± 0.08 in the conventional group and 0.45 ± 0.03, 0.46 ± 0.02 in the PSG group. The inclination and version angles were −1.93° ± 4.31°, 2.27° ± 5.91° and 0.46° ± 0.02°, 3.38° ± 2.79°. The standard deviation showed a smaller difference in the PSG group. The anteroposterior and lateromedial humeral canal center offset in the humeral component were 0.45 ± 0.12, 0.48 ± 0.15 in the conventional group and 0.46 ± 0.59 (p=0.794), 0.46 ± 0.06 (p=0.702) in the PSG group. The PSG showed significantly better humeral stem alignment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSGs with 3-dimensional reconstruction reduces variabilities in glenoid and humerus component positions and prevents extreme positioning errors in RTSA.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty , Cadaver , Humerus , ShoulderABSTRACT
Objective To compare instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides versus conventional techniques in supramalleolar osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis.Methods A retrospective analysis was done of the 21 patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics,Shanghai JiaoTong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018.They were divided into 2 groups by their treatment methods.In the 9 patients treated by instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides,there were 6 males and 3 females with an age of 54.6 ±8.6 years,4 left and 5 right sides involved,and one case of Takakura stage 1,3 cases of Takakura stage 2 and 5 cases of Takakura stage 3a.In the 12 patients treated by conventional techniques,there were 7 males and 5 females with an age of 53.0 ± 6.5 years,7 left and 5 right sides involved,and one case of Takakura stage 1,5 cases of Takakura stage 2 and 6 cases of Takakura stage 3a.The 3D printed guide group and the conventional group were compared in terms of operation time,intraoperative blood loss and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy,tibial anterior surface angle (TAS),talar tilt angle (TT),and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS).The differences in TAS,TT and TLS between pre-and post-operation in the 3D printed guide group were also evaluated.Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05),indicating they were comparable.All the patients were available for follow-up for an average of 7.8 months (from 3 to 15 months).The 3D printed guide group incurred significantly shorter operation time (106.2 ± 10.6 min),less intraoperative blood loss (207.2 ± 16.0 mL) and lower fluoroscopy frequency (2 ± 0) than the conventional osteotomy group (all P ＜ 0.01).The post-operative TAS (94.3° ± 3.2°) and TT (3.8° ± 0.8°) angles in the 3D guide group were significantly different from their preoperative values (84.6°±3.5° and 7.6°± 1.6°) (P ＜ 0.01).The 3D printed guide group was not significantly different from the conventional group in postoperative TAS (94.3°± 3.2° versus 92.4°±5.9°),TT (3.8° ± 0.8° versus 4.2° ± 1.1°) or TLS (83.7° ± 3.4° versus 84.2° ± 2.2°) angles (P ＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with conventional techniques,instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides can shorten operation time and reduce intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency.The 3D printed patient-specific guides in osteotomy can facilitate accurate correction of varus deformity,leading to similar efficacy compared with conventional osteotomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides versus conventional techniques in supramalleolar osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis.@*Methods@#A retrospective analysis was done of the 21 patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai JiaoTong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. They were divided into 2 groups by their treatment methods. In the 9 patients treated by instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides, there were 6 males and 3 females with an age of 54.6±8.6 years, 4 left and 5 right sides involved, and one case of Takakura stage 1, 3 cases of Takakura stage 2 and 5 cases of Takakura stage 3a. In the 12 patients treated by conventional techniques, there were 7 males and 5 females with an age of 53.0±6.5 years, 7 left and 5 right sides involved, and one case of Takakura stage 1, 5 cases of Takakura stage 2 and 6 cases of Takakura stage 3a. The 3D printed guide group and the conventional group were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), talar tilt angle (TT), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS). The differences in TAS, TT and TLS between pre- and post-operation in the 3D printed guide group were also evaluated.@*Results@#There were no significant differences in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups (P>0.05), indicating they were comparable. All the patients were available for follow-up for an average of 7.8 months (from 3 to 15 months). The 3D printed guide group incurred significantly shorter operation time (106.2±10.6 min), less intraoperative blood loss (207.2±16.0 mL) and lower fluoroscopy frequency (2±0) than the conventional osteotomy group (all P<0.01). The post-operative TAS (94.3°±3.2°) and TT (3.8°±0.8°) angles in the 3D guide group were significantly different from their preoperative values (84.6°±3.5° and 7.6°±1.6°) (P<0.01). The 3D printed guide group was not significantly different from the conventional group in postoperative TAS (94.3°±3.2° versus 92.4°±5.9°), TT (3.8°±0.8° versus 4.2°±1.1°) or TLS (83.7°±3.4° versus 84.2°±2.2°) angles (P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#Compared with conventional techniques, instrumentation with 3D-printed patient-specific guides can shorten operation time and reduce intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency. The 3D printed patient-specific guides in osteotomy can facilitate accurate correction of varus deformity, leading to similar efficacy compared with conventional osteotomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To review the progress of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (AOA). Methods: The domestic and foreign literatures about TAA in recent years were reviewed. The current status and progress of TAA were summarized from the results of traditional and computer-assisted TAA clinical outcomes. Results: End-stage AOA often leads to severe pain and dysfunction, and arthrodesis is still the main selective treatment option. In recent years, with the advancement of surgical techniques and prosthesis design, TAA which can remain joint mobility has increased gradually, and the surgical results also have significant progress. Accurate prosthesis implant and mechanical alignment restoration are critical factors for TAA, and surgery-related malalignment is correlative to the prosthesis failure. Computer assisted patient-specific guide can simplify the TAA procedures and obtain the accuracy of tibia and talus osteotomy. Conclusion: The clinical efficiency of preoperative CT based patient-specific guide technology for TAA needs further clinical follow-up. Meanwhile, it is necessary to further develop intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery system suitable for TAA.