ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción : Las cefaleas son la segunda causa de consultas neurológicas en la sala de emergencia pediá trica. Muchos pacientes realizan varias visitas al año por este mismo problema, debemos conocer el tratamiento basado en evidencia. Métodos : Se realizó una búsqueda de publicaciones realizadas en los últimos 5 años en diferentes bases de datos. Discusión : Se presentan recursos para investigar sistemáticamente signos de alarma, recomendaciones para el uso racional de estudio de imágenes. Las cefaleas primarias son causa frecuente de consulta en la sala de emergencia. Se presenta tratamiento que cumple el res paldo científico para su utilización en pacientes con ce faleas primarias de tipo migraña en sala de emergencia.
Abstract Introduction : Headache is the second most frequent cause of neurological consultations in the pediatric emergency department. Patients become frequent visi tors per year due to headaches, evidence-based treat ment should be used. Methods : A search of publications within the last 5 years was conducted in different databases. Discussion : Strategies for a systematic approach in the evaluation of red flags, and recommendations for a rational use in neuroimaging studies are presented. Primary headaches are frequently seen in the emergency department. Migraine evidence-based treatment in the emergency department is reviewed.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: Pocos estudios son concluyentes sobre la utilidad de la Oxigenoterapia por Cánula Nasal de Alto Flujo (CNAF) en pacientes con crisis asmática. OBJETIVO: Determinar la eficacia de la CNAF en niños mayores de 2 años con crisis asmática severa y moderada que no responde al tratamiento inicial. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Ensayo clínico randomizado controlado abierto de pacientes con exacerbación asmática en un Departamento de Emergencia Pediátrica. Se excluyó crisis mediadas por infecciones y comorbilidad. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados: Grupo 1 CNAF (n: 32) y Grupo 2 Oxigenoterapia Convencional (n: 33). Ambos grupos recibieron el tratamiento farmacológico habitual. El primer punto de corte fue el descenso del PIS en más de 2 puntos a las 2 horas del tratamiento; los puntos secundarios: descenso del PIS a las 6 horas, tiempo de permanencia en la emergencia e ingreso a UCIP. RESULTADOS: Las características basales fueron similares en ambos grupos. La proporción de sujetos con disminución de más de dos puntos en el PIS a las 2 horas de tratamiento Grupo 1: 43,7% IC 95% (28-60) vs Grupo 2: 48,4%; IC 95% (32-64) p 0,447. La estadía media fue 24,8 ± 12,3 horas en el Grupo1 vs 24 ± 14,8 horas en el Grupo2; IC 95% (7,56-5,96) p 0,37. No encontramos diferencias del score y puntaje del esfuerzo respiratorio en mediciones cada 2 horas. Ningún paciente ingresó a cuidados intensivos. CONCLUSIONES: La incorporación de la CNAF al tratamiento de pacientes con crisis asmática no presentó beneficios clínicos ni disminuyó el tiempo de estadía en el DEP.
INTRODUCTION: There are few conclusive studies on the usefulness of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Oxygen Therapy in patients with asthmatic crises. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of HFNC in chil dren older than 2 years of age that present severe and moderate asthmatic crises that do not respond to initial treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Open controlled randomized clinical trial of patients with asthma exacerbation in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Infection- and comorbidity-media ted crises were excluded. Subjects were randomized as follows: Group 1 HFNC (n:32) and Group 2 Conventional Oxygen Therapy (n:33). Both groups received the usual pharmacological treatment. The first cut-off point was the decrease of more than 2 points of the PIS after 2 hours of treatment; secondary points were PIS decrease at 6 hours, stay time in the Emergency Room, and PICU admis sion. RESULTS: The patient's baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The proportion of subjects with more than two points decrease in the PIS after two hours of treatment in Group 1 was 43.7% CI 95% (28-60) vs. Group 2 48.4%; CI 95% (32-64) p 0.447. The mean stay time was 24.8 ± 12.3 hours in Group 1 vs. 24 ± 14.8 hours in Group 2; CI 95% (7.56-5.96) p 0.37. We did not find differences in the respiratory effort score measurements every 2 hours. No patients were admitted to intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of HFNC oxygen therapy in the treatment of patients with asthmatic crises in the Pediatric Emergency Department did not show clinical benefits nor did it diminish the stay time.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Status Asthmaticus/therapy , Cannula , Time Factors , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, Pediatric , Length of StayABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: The Pediatric Assessment Triangle is a rapid assessment tool that uses only visual and auditory clues, requires no equipment, and takes 30-60 s to perform. It's being used internationally in different emergency settings, but few studies have assessed its performance. The aim of this narrative biomedical review is to summarize the literature available regarding the usefulness of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in clinical practice. Sources: The authors carried out a non-systematic review in the PubMed®, MEDLINE®, and EMBASE® databases, searching for articles published between 1999-2016 using the keywords "pediatric assessment triangle," "pediatric triage," "pediatric assessment tools," and "pediatric emergency department." Summary of the findings: The Pediatric Assessment Triangle has demonstrated itself to be useful to assess sick children in the prehospital setting and make transport decisions. It has been incorporated, as an essential instrument for assessing sick children, into different life support courses, although little has been written about the effectiveness of teaching it. Little has been published about the performance of this tool in the initial evaluation in the emergency department. In the emergency department, the Pediatric Assessment Triangle is useful to identify the children at triage who require more urgent care. Recent studies have assessed and proved its efficacy to also identify those patients having more serious health conditions who are eventually admitted to the hospital. Conclusions: The Pediatric Assessment Triangle is quickly spreading internationally and its clinical applicability is very promising. Nevertheless, it is imperative to promote research for clinical validation, especially for clinical use by emergency pediatricians and physicians.
Resumo Objetivo: O Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica é uma ferramenta de avaliação rápida que usa apenas pistas visuais e auditivas, não necessita de equipamentos e leva de 30-60 segundos. Tem sido usado internacionalmente em diferentes configurações de emergência, porém poucos estudos avaliaram seu desempenho. O objetivo desta análise biomédica narrativa é resumir a literatura disponível com relação à utilidade do Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica na prática clínica. Fontes: Fizemos uma análise não sistemática nas bases de dados do PubMed®, Medline® e Embase® em busca de artigos publicados entre 1999-2016 com as palavras-chave "triângulo de avaliação pediátrica", "triângulo pediátrico", "ferramentas de avaliação pediátrica" e "departamento de emergência pediátrica". Resumo dos achados: O Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica demonstrou ser útil na avaliação de crianças doentes na configuração pré-hospitalar e na tomada de decisões de transporte. Ele foi incorporado, como um instrumento essencial na avaliação de crianças doentes, em diferentes cursos de apoio de vida, apesar de pouco ter sido escrito sobre a eficácia de ensino do Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica. Pouco foi publicado sobre o desempenho do Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica na avaliação inicial no departamento de emergência (DE). No DE, o Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica é útil para identificar, na triagem, crianças que exigem cuidado mais urgente. Estudos recentes avaliaram e provaram a eficácia do Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica também na identificação dos pacientes com doenças de saúde mais graves e, eventualmente, são internados no hospital. Conclusões: O Triângulo de Avaliação Pediátrica se difunde rapidamente de forma internacional e sua aplicabilidade clínica é muito promissora. Contudo, é essencial promover pesquisa para validação clínica, principalmente para o uso clínico por pediatras e médicos de emergência.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Child Health Services , Triage/methods , Decision Making , Emergency Service, Hospital , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
The education and training of professionals in this field are important for the further development of emergency medicine.The training system of pediatric emergency physicians and nurses in the United States and other developed countries were briefly introduced,the main problems of training system in China were analyzed,and effective proposal for the improvement of emergency medicine training system was also put forward.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The quality of treatment for critically ill children varies widely at different hospitals. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of mortality in a pediatric emergency department (PED) at a tertiary children's hospital in Guangzhou, China and to investigate the risk factors associated with the mortality. METHODS: The mortality of pediatric patients at the hospital from 2011 to 2013 was retrospectively analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Altogether 466919 patients visited the PED during the period and 43925 of them were admitted for further observation. In 230 deaths, the ratio of boys to girls was 1.4:1, and their age ranged from 2 hours to 16 years (median, 5 months). The time from admission to death ranged from 0 to 216 hours (median, 1.5 hours). There were 92 (40％) patients who died within 24 hours after admission and 104 (45.2％) patients who died on arrival. The prominent causes of the deaths were respiratory diseases, neuromuscular disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and sepsis, most of which were ascribed to severe infection. Sixty-five deaths were associated with more than one concomitant problem. The top concomitant problems were congenital malformation, low gestational age, and severe birth asphyxia. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, 40％ of the patients in the PED died of fatal acute diseases, and pneumonia was the first leading cause of the deaths. Almost half of the deaths occurred on arrival and the rest were due to end-stage malignant diseases. This study emphasized the importance of prevention of birth deficits by reducing deaths in infants and children.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Revisit to the pediatric emergency department (ED) in the short-term period may be due to inadequate evaluation during the previous visit, which may indicate a problem with quality in emergency care. The aims of this study are to analyze the characteristics of patients who revisited the pediatric ED within 48 hours after discharge and to evaluate the relation between overcrowding and revisit rates. METHODS: Retrospectively, we reviewed the charts of patients who returned within 48 hours after visiting a PED during a one-year period between June 1st, 2011 and December 31st, 2011. We determined the rate of return visits and review the characteristics of patients, emergency severity index (ESI) level at visits, cause of revisit, diagnosis, and crowding degree of the pediatric ED at the patient's first visit. RESULTS: A total of 16,688 patients visited the pediatric ED and 13,716 patients were discharged from the PED during the period. Of these discharged patients, 534 patients revisited inevitably within 48 hours. The most common cause of revisit was relapse or worsened symptoms (70.0%). There was no significant difference in sex, severity of patient, and crowding degree of the pediatric ED at the first visit, however, patients who revisited were younger than those who did not (p=0.005). The ESI level at the return visit was significantly higher irrespective of admission after revisit (p<0.001). In diagnosis grouping, patients with gastrointestinal diseases, respiratory diseases, and neoplastic diseases showed a higher rate of revisit. CONCLUSION: Approximately 4% of our pediatric ED visits were for children returning within 48 hours. Patients who revisited were younger and patients with gastrointestinal diseases, neoplastic diseases, and respiratory diseases were more likely to revisit. Careful explanation of the possibility of worsened symptoms is necessary for these patients.