ABSTRACT
Objectives:To compare the early curative effect of visualization of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(VPTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:49 patients with single segmental lumbar spinal stenosis combined with lumbar disc herniation(LDH) were treated in our hospital from March 2016 to March 2017.Among them,21 cases accepted VPTED,and 28 cases underwent MED.The length of incision,amount of bleeding during operation,operation time,length of hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were recorded in the both groups.Visual analogue scale(VAS) was used to evaluate the effect of surgery,Oswestry disability index(ODI) was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.The modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the efficacy of the patients at final follow-up.Results:There were no statistical differences among the age,the ratio of male to female,follow-up time,low back pain,weakness,sensory disturbance,general reflexes and prominent segments(P＞0.05).There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS or ODI score between groups at the same time (P＞0.05).The length of incision(0.78±0.06cm vs 1.95±0.12cm),the amount of intraoperative perspective(15.86± 2.66 vs 2.18±0.38) and the operation time(87.51±30.46min vs 47.53±13.61min) had significant difference between VPTED and MED group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in hospitalization time or hospitalization expenses between the two groups(P＞0.05).At final follow-up,based on the MacNab standard,it was excellent in 17 cases,good in 3 cases,fair in 1 case in VPTED group;it was excellent in 22 cases,good in 4 cases,fair in 2 cases in MED group.Excellent rate of the VPTED group was 95.24％,and that was 92.86％ in the MED group,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusions:Visualization of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (VPTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis have good short-term curative effect,it iproves that VPTED is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the complications of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation treated with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD), and discuss how to avoid these complications.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The data of 132 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation underwent PELD from October 2013 and June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, including 85 males and 47 females with an average age of 42.9 years old. There were 6 cases of L₃,₄, 68 of L₄,₅ and 58 of L₅S₁. The incidences of intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There was spinal dura mater injury in 1 patient, but no cerebrospinal fluid leakage and nerve function deficit was found, the muscle strength did not decrease postoperatively and the incision healed well. Two patients converted to open surgery ultimately because of stenosis of the intervertebral foramen and adhesion between nucleus pulposus and spinal dura mater; two patients complicated with early recurrence(in 3 months);nucleus pulposus residue developed in 3 patients; all of them were treated by open surgery and got satisfactory results. One patient with heart disease history complicated with supraventricular tachycardia after surgery and 2 patients with the increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure during surgery.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>PELD have a steep learning curve, and the technology is a safe and effective method in treating lumbar disc herniation, but the beginners must have enough open surgery experience, and to grasp indications strictly.</p>