Disposal of donor livers in Brazil: how to optimize their utilization rate in transplants? / Descarte de fígados de doadores no Brasil: como otimizar sua taxa de utilização em transplantes?

ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the professionals´ perception of the use of deceased donor liver for transplantation, the reasons to decline them, and propose strategies to increase their use safely. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive qualitative-quantitative study. Professionals working with liver transplantation answered a self-administered, structured, and electronic questionnaire comprising 17 questions distributed into four sessions (demographic factors, perception of use of organs, reasons for disposal, and measures to favor their usage). Results: A total of 42 professionals participated in the study. The rate of use of organs was considered low by 71.43% (n=30) of respondents or very low by 19.05% (n=8). Everyone agreed that it was possible to increase it. Thirty-one (73.81%) participants believed the expansion of the population of extended criteria donors affected this index negatively. Donor-related conditions were the most frequent category of reasons for refusing a liver for transplantation, being the findings during organ retrieval the most frequent reason in clinical practice. Enhanced training of intensive care teams in the treatment of donors was the primary measure selected to favor the use of the organs, followed by investment in new technologies to optimize its preservation/evaluate its function before transplantation. Conclusion: Implementation of strategies to increase the rate of acceptance of livers is expected. Improvements in donor intensive care and implementation of new preservation technologies should favor the use of the organs.

RESUMO Objetivo: Compreender a percepção dos profissionais acerca do uso de fígado de doadores falecidos para transplante e os motivos para sua recusa, além de propor estratégias para ampliar sua utilização com segurança. Métodos: Estudo do tipo transversal, descritivo qualiquantitativo.Profissionais que trabalhavam com transplante hepático responderam a um questionário autoaplicável, estruturado e eletrônico, composto de 17 questões distribuídas em quatro seções (fatores demográficos, percepção sobre a utilização dos órgãos, razões para o descarte e medidas para favorecer sua utilização). Resultados: Participaram do estudo 42 profissionais. A taxa de utilização dos órgãos foi considerada baixa por 71,43% (n=30) dos respondentes ou muito baixa por 19,05% (n=8). Todos concordaram que era possível aumentá-la. Trinta e um (73,81%) participantes acreditavam que a expansão da população de doadores de critérios estendidos impacta negativamente nesse índice. Condições relacionadas ao doador foi a categoria mais frequente de razões para a recusa de um fígado para transplante, sendo os achados durante a cirurgia de extração o motivo mais frequente na prática clínica. O melhor treinamento das equipes da terapia intensiva nos cuidados com os doadores foi a principal medida selecionada para favorecer a utilização dos órgãos, seguido pelo investimento em novas tecnologias para otimizar sua preservação/avaliar sua função antes do transplante. Conclusão: A efetivação de estratégias para aumentar a taxa de aceite de fígados de doadores é aguardada. Melhorias no cuidado intensivo do doador e a implementação de novas tecnologias de preservação devem favorecer a utilização desses órgãos.

Predictors of outcomes after correction of acute type a aortic dissection under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion

Abstract Introduction: Hypothermic circulatory arrest is widely used for correction of acute type A aortic dissection pathology. We present our experience of 45 consecutive patients operated in our unit with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Methods: Between January 2011 and April 2015, 45 consecutive patients were admitted for acute type A aortic dissection and operated emergently under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. Results: Mean age was 58±11.4 years old. Median circulatory arrest time was 41.5 (30-54) minutes while the 30-day mortality and postoperative permanent neurological deficits rates were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. Unadjusted analysis revealed that the factors associated with 30-day mortality were: preoperative hemodynamic instability (OR: 14.8, 95% CI: 2.41, 90.6, P=0.004); and postoperative requirement for open sternum management (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.041, 24.02, P=0.044) while preoperative hemodynamic instability (OR: 8.8, 95% CI: 1.41, 54.9, P=0.02) and postoperative sepsis or multiple organ dysfunction (OR: 13.6, 95% CI: 2.1, 89.9, P=0.007) were correlated with neurological dysfunction. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, postoperative sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction independently predicted (OR: 15.9, 95% CI: 1.05, 96.4, P=0.045) the incidence of severe postoperative neurological complication. During median follow-up of 6 (2-12) months, the survival rate was 86.7%. Conclusion: Bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and direct carotid perfusion for cardiopulmonary bypass, in the surgical treatment for correction of acute aortic dissection type A, is a valuable technique with low 30-day mortality rate. However, postoperative severe neurological dysfunctions remain an issue that warrants further research.