ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application value of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and compare the clinical outcomes between 3D-LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD).Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The clinicopathological data of 349 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Affiliated Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between July 2014 and March 2016 were collected.Of 349 patients,146 undergoing 3D-LPD were allocated into the 3D group and 203 undergoing OPD were allocated into the OPD group.Observation indicators:(1) surgical situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,cases of blood transfusion,number of lymph node dissected,resection margin and vascular resection and reconstruction,(2) postoperative situations:time of gastric tube removal,duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay,duration of hospital stay,(3) complications:pancreatic fistula,delayed gastric emptying,intra-abdominal infection or abscess,bile leakage,hemorrhage,pulmonary infection or wound infection,(4) follow-up.All the patients were followed up by telephone interview to detect the tumor-free survival rate up to June 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as (x) ± s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Count data were analyzed using the chi-square test.Results (1) Surgical situations:all the patients underwent successful pancreaticoduodenectomy.Operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,cases of blood transfusion,number of lymph node dissected and positive resection margin were (334 ± 175)minutes,(254 ± 107)mL,29,13 ±8,1 in the 3D group and(320 ±91)minutes,(290 ± 101) mL,35,14 ±9,5 in the OPD group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =0.975,1.383,x2=0.390,t =12.155,x2=1.589,P ＞ 0.05).Vascular resection and reconstruction were respectively applied to 0 patient in the 3D group and 14 patients in the OPD group,with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =10.490,P ＜ 0.05).(2) Postoperative situations:time of gastric tube removal,duration of ICU stay and duration of hospital stay were (2.9 ± 1.9) days,(6.9 ± 2.1) days,(12.9 ± 7.2) days in the 3D group and (5.1 ± 1.7) days,(7.4 ± 1.2) days,(19.8 ± 7.1) days in the OPD group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =11.350,2.814,8.903,P ＜ 0.05).(3) Complications:of 146 patients in the 3D group,40 had postoperative complications with incidence of complications of 27.40％ (40/146).Twenty-nine patients with pancreatic fistula (20 in grade A,9 in grade B and C) were improved by conservative treatment.Thirteen patients with delayed gastric emptying were cured by gastrointestinal decompression and enhancing gastric motility.Of 5 patients with postoperative hemorrhage,3 were improved by conservative treatment,and 2 were improved by small vein hemostasis behind the head of pancreas.One patient died of systemic inflammatory response syndrome.Partial patients were combined with multiple complications.Of 203 patients in the OPD group,60 had postoperative complications with incidence of complications of 29.56％ (60/203),including 39 patients with pancreatic fistula (31 in grade A,8 in grade B and C),25 with delayed gastric emptying,15 with intra-abdominal infection and 13 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome,and they were improved by conservative treatment.Of 8 patients with postoperative hemorrhage,4 were improved by conservative treatment,and 4 were cured by hemostatic therapy after ineffectual blood transfusion and interventional treatment.Two patients died of cardiopulmonary complication.Partial patients were combined with multiple complications.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complication between the 2 groups (x2 =10.490,P ＞ 0.05).(4) Follow-up:all the patients were followed up at postoperative month 6.Tumor-free survival rate was 90.41％ (132/146) in the 3D group and 85.22％ (173/203) in the OPD group,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =2.076,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with OPD,3D-LPD can provide the more realistic visual effects and refinement of surgical procedures,with a good short-term outcome.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze postoperative complications of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and side-to-end or end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.Methods The clinical data of 342 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2004 to May 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were divided into the duct-to-mucosa group (179 cases)and side-to-end or end-to-end group(163 cases)according to the styles of pancreaticojejunostomy.The relationship between the incidence and severity of postoperative complications of the 2 anastomotic styles were analyzed according to the Clavien grading system.The measurement data and the count data were analyzed using the t test or chi-square test.Results The overall complication rate was 48.8％(167/342),and the complication rate was 38.0％(68/179)in the side-to-end group and 60.7％(99/163)in the side-to-end or end-to-end group,with a significant difference between the 2 groups(x2=17.667,P ＜0.05).The incidences of grade Ⅱ and grade Ⅴ complications were 16.8％(30/179)and 1.1％(2/179)in the duct-to-mucosa group,which were significantly lower than 28.2％(46/163)and 5.5％(9/163)of the side-to-end or end-to-end group(x2=6.484,5.316,P ＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with side-to-end or end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy,duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy is a better style with a lower incidence of postoperative complication.