Changes of biomarkers in fluid derived from peritoneal cavity and their relationship with transport rate in peritoneum in patients with new peritoneal catheter / 国际生物医学工程杂志

Objective:To investigate the changes of biomarkers in peritoneal dialysis patients' peritoneal drainage fluid and their relationship with the peritoneal small molecule solute transport rate (PSTR).Methods:Seventy newly-tubed peritoneal dialysis patients from the Peritoneal Dialysis Center of the First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 29, 2014 to April 26, 2018 were selected. The levels of biomarkers plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the peritoneal dialysis priming fluid were measured at different time points and 4 h dialysate/blood muscle (D/P) creatinine values at 2 years of follow-up, and the correlation between biomarkers in the extracted peritoneal fluid and 4 h D/P creatinine was examined.Results:Longitudinal studies showed an increase in PAI-1 ( P<0.001) and VEGF ( P=0.04) with increasing duration of peritoneal dialysis. PSTR levels at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up were significantly correlated with PAI-1, MMP-2, and VEGF levels at baseline. PSTR at 2 years was also correlated with MMP-2 levels at 6 months and PAI-1 levels at baseline. Conclusions:The biomarkers PAI-1, MMP-2, and VEGF in peritoneal dialysis drainage fluid are positively correlated with PSTR in peritoneal dialysis patients during the 2-year period.

Eficacia del destechado del túnel en infección crónica del catéter peritoneal / Tunnel unroofing effectiveness in chronic peritoneal catheter infection

Introducción: la infección crónica del catéter involucra generalmente la colonización del manguito de dacrón (ôcuffõ) externo; sin su remoción el tratamiento antibiótico es inefectivo, la técnica de destechado de catéter ha sido descrita como una alternativa a la extracción del catéter peritoneal. Material y métodos: Se analizaron datos en forma retrospectiva de 13 pacientes. Se evaluó la evolución luego del destechado, considerando como fracaso del tratamiento a la aparición de nueva infección en el orificio, túnel o peritonitis asociada al mismo germen. Resultados: Entre los años 1997-2014, se le practicó destechado a 13 pacientes. Edad promedio 46,23 años (IC 95%: 35,92 años û 56,54 años). Sexo masculino 9, 69,23% (IC 95%: 41,95% û 96,50%).Gérmenes estafilococo 7, pseudomona 2, polimicrobiano 1, cultivo negativo 3. Hubo curación en 9 pacientes, 69,23% (IC 95%: 41,95% û 96,06) no hubo asociación estadística entre sexo, edad, resultado microbiológico, presencia de hemodiálisis previa, tipo de catéter, técnica quirúrgica ni con el cirujano que realizó el procedimiento (p> 0.05). Discusión: La extracción del catéter implica la transferencia transitoria a hemodiálisis y una nueva cirugía de recolocación, si bien existe poca experiencia con la técnica de destechado, puede ser una alternativa válida, permitiendo a un grupo de pacientes continuar con el tratamiento de DP. Conclusión: La cirugía de destechado ha resultado beneficiosa en el 69,23% de los casos (9 pacientes) independientemente del tipo de germen presente, representando un tratamiento aceptable que evita la remoción del catéter permitiendo así la continuidad de la modalidad, disminuyendo la necesidad de emplear terapias más agresivas.

Introduction: chronic catheter infection usually involves external Dacron cuff colonization, without its removal, antibiotic treatment proved ineffective. Catheter unroofing technique has been described as an alternative to peritoneal catheter removal. Material and methods: We analyzed the data from 13 patients retrospectively. Evolution after unroofing was evaluated, considering as treatment failure the appearance of new infection in the hole, tunnel or peritonitis associated to the same germ. Results: Between 1997-2014 years, unroofing was performed on 13 patients. Mean age-rate: 46.2 (IC 95%: 35.9 years û 56.5 years) male sex 9, 69.23%. Germs: staphylococcus 7, pseudomona 2, polymicrobial 1, negative culture 3. Nine patiens healed: 69.2%; there was no statistical association among sex, age, microbiological result, previous hemodialysis use, type of catheter, surgical technique or with the surgeon who performed the procedure (p> 0.05). Discussion: Catheter removal implies transient transference to hemodialysis and new replacement surgery, although there is few experience with this technique, it could be an acceptable alternative, enabling a group of patients to continue with PD treatment. Conclusion: Unroofing technique proved to be beneficial in 69.2% of the cases (9 patients) independently of the type of germ present, representing an acceptable treatment which avoids catheter removal, enabling the procedure to continue, and decreasing the need to employ more aggressive therapies.

Modified Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion: Comparison with a Conventional Method

PURPOSE: The conventional trocar and cannula method in peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion has its limitation in clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare a modified method for percutaneous PD catheter insertion with the conventional method, and demonstrate advantages of the modified method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at a single center who had percutaneous PD catheters inserted by nephrologists from January 2006 until September 2012, using either a modified method (group M) or the conventional trocar and cannula method (group C), were retrospectively analyzed, in terms of baseline characteristics, complications experienced up to 3 months after the procedure, and the suitability of the procedure for patients. RESULTS: Group M included 82 subjects, while group C included 66 cases. The overall early complication rate in group M (1.2%) was significantly lower than that in group C (19.7%) (p<0.001). The catheter revision rate during timeframe for early complications was significantly lower in group M (0%) than in group C (6.1%) (p=0.024). When comparing Procedure time (1 h 3 min+/-16 min vs. 1 h 36 min+/-19 min, p<0.01), immediate post-procedural pain (2.43+/-1.80 vs. 3.14+/-2.07, p<0.05), and post-procedure days until ambulation (3.95+/-1.13 days vs. 6.17+/-1.34 days, p<0.01), group M was significantly lower than group C. There was no significant difference in total hospitalization period (14.71+/-7.05 days vs. 13.86+/-3.7 days). CONCLUSION: Our modified PD catheter insertion method shows its advantages in early complication rate, early complications revision rate, and the patients' conveniences.

A Case of Successful Endoscopic Clipping for Iatrogenic Colon Perforation Induced by Peritoneal Catheter Insertion / 대한소화기학회지

Advanced cancer patients with refractory ascites often do not respond to conventional treatments including dietary sodium restriction, diuretics, and repeated large volume paracentesis. In these patients, continuous peritoneal drainage by an indwelling catheter may be an effective option for managing refractory ascites with a relative low complication rate. Peritoneal catheter-induced complications include hypotension, hematoma, leakage, cellulitis, peritonitis, and bowel perforation. Although bowel perforation is a very rare complication, it can become disastrous and necessitates emergency surgical treatment. Herein, we report a case of a 57-year-old male with refractory ascites due to advanced liver cancer who experienced iatrogenic colonic perforation after peritoneal drainage catheter insertion and was treated successfully with endoscopic clipping.

Laparotomy versus Laparoscopic Placement of Distal Catheter in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Procedure

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, peritoneal catheter is inserted with midline laparotomy incision in ventriculoperitoneal (V-P) shunt procedures. Complications of V-P shunt is not uncommon and have been reported to occur in 5-37% of cases. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and the operation time between laparotomy and laparoscopic groups. METHODS: A total of 155 V-P shunt procedures were performed to treat hydrocephalic patients of various origins in our institute between June 2006 to January 2010; 95 of which were laparoscopically guided and 65 were not. We reviewed the operation time, surgery-related complications, and intraoperative and postoperative problems. RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, the mean duration of the procedure (52 minutes) was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) than the laparotomy group (109 minutes). There were two cases of malfunctions and one incidence of diaphragm injury in the laparotomy group. In contrast, there were neither malfunction nor any internal organ injuries in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.034). There were total of two cases of infections from both groups (p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopically guided insertions of distal shunt catheter is considered a fast and safe method in contrast to the laparotomy technique. This method allows the exact localization of the peritoneal catheter and a confirmation of its patency.

Application of laparoscopy in placement of peritoneal catheters in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To evaluate laparoscopy for insertion of peritoneal catheters in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Methods Twenty patients of end-stage renal disease.During laparoscopic surgery,the peritoneal catheter was advanced into the abdomen by inducing thread.Results All procedures were completed by laparoscopy successfully. There was no intraoperative complication or surgical mortality. Conclusion Laparoscopy is feasible, safe, and effective for peritoneal catheters placement.