ABSTRACT
Objetivos: Comparar os critérios de formação de preços de medicamentos no Brasil e em países selecionados, analisar o mecanismo de formação de preços de medicamentos no Brasil e analisar o mecanismo de formação de preços de medicamentos em países selecionados. Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão narrativa da literatura por meio do levantamento de informações em bases de dados, em sites das agências nacionais e organismos internacionais e em literatura "cinzenta", a respeito dos sistemas de saúde e mecanismos de formação de preços de medicamentos no Brasil e nos países selecionados (Austrália, Canadá, Espanha, Estados Unidos, França, Grécia, Itália, Nova Zelândia e Portugal). Resultados: A maioria dos países pesquisados utiliza o referenciamento externo e interno de preços, realiza ajustes e correções de preços ao longo do tempo e faz estudos de avaliação econômica. O valor da terapia ou seu benefício para o paciente ou sistema de saúde é um fator importante tanto na determinação do preço como da incorporação no sistema de saúde. Conclusão: Este trabalho permitiu identificar as semelhanças entre as práticas recomendadas e implementadas internacionalmente e as realizadas no Brasil, bem como os problemas relacionados à definição de preços das novas terapias, além das lacunas no modelo regulatório atual
Objectives: To compare the criteria for setting prices of medicines in Brazil and in selected countries, to analyze the mechanism for setting prices of medicines in Brazil and to analyze the mechanism for setting prices of medicines in selected countries. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was carried out by collecting information in databases, on websites of national agencies and international organizations and in "gray" literature, regarding health systems and price formation mechanisms of medicines in Brazil and selected countries (Australia, Canada, Spain, United States, France, Greece, Italy, New Zealand and Portugal). Results: Most of the countries surveyed use external and internal price referencing, make price adjustments and corrections over time and carry out economic evaluation studies. The value of therapy or its benefit to the patient or health care system is an important factor in both pricing and incorporation into the health care system. Conclusion: This work allowed identify the similarities between the practices recommended and implemented internationally and those carried out in Brazil, as well as the problems related to the pricing of new therapies, in addition to the gaps in the current regulatory model
Subject(s)
Reimbursement Mechanisms , Drug Price , Health Systems , Drug Costs , Costs and Cost AnalysisABSTRACT
Background: Price of a drug is an important factor for compliance to the treatment. So, to overcome the high prices of drugs, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) under government of India has issued Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) list containing commonly used drugs. Pharmaceutical companies can be punished if they keep their prices higher than the ceiling price mentioned in the DPCO. To find out the price variations of commonly used antidepressant drugs included in DPCO list of 29th April 2019.Methods: A list of all oral antidepressant drugs included in DPCO of 29th April 2019 and available in Indian market was procured from medguide India. Analysis of number of total brands following as well as not following DPCO ceiling price was done.Results: Author found 17 formulations of four antidepressant drugs included in DPCO. Total 556 brands found out of which 84.6% were following the DPCO and 15.4% of brands prices were higher than the ceiling price of DPCO.Conclusions: Though large number of companies are following the DPCO but still strict regulation is needed to further increase the compliance of guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Objective To describe and evaluate the strategies,status quo,effect and problems of pharmaceutical pricing reform in 4 batches of urban public hospitals in China.Methods Chinese database and website of Commission of Health and Family Planning were searched.Bibliometrics was done.Results A total of 33 studies were included by screening and reading the abstracts.Among them,4 were masters' theses,and 29 were research articles and reviews.Generally quantitative researches with strong study designs accounted for only a small proportion.Most of the local reforms achieved basic targets,such as cancelling medicine addition,increasing medical service price,improving hospital internal operating efficiency and controlling medical price,however problems still existed including incomplete adjustment for medical services prices and unmet needs of differentiated compensation plans.Conclusion The prices of medical services should make further adjustment.Efforts should still be made in terms of establishing dynamic compensation mechanism for urban public hospitals,coordinating the policy decision-making process for more integrated measurements including reforms on payment models and logistic process.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the Risk Sharing Agreement (RSA) on pharmaceutical pricing system in Korean national health insurance. Through RSA, the insurer was able to maintain the principles in the price listing process while managing the budget effectively and improving patient access to new drugs. Despite these positive effects, there are still issues raised by some stakeholders, such as lack of transparency in the listing process and doubts about its effectiveness. Therefore, we investigated the impacts of RSA on national health insurance financing and patient access to analyze the effects of RSA. METHODS: The impact of RSA was investigated by analyzing the health insurance claims data for 2014~2016. The degree of improvement in patient access was determined by the decreased amount of patients' payment. RESULTS: Results showed that the financial impact of RSA was not significant and patients' access to the new drug greatly improved. CONCLUSION: These results show that RSA is a good system for improving patient access to new drugs without additional expense on insurance.
Subject(s)
Humans , Budgets , Insurance Carriers , Insurance , Insurance, Health , National Health ProgramsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The proportion of pharmaceutical expenditure out of total health-care expenditure in South Korea is high. In 2016, 25.7% of national health insurance (NHI) spending was for pharmaceuticals. Given the increasing demands for the access to newly introduced medicines and following increase in pharmaceutical spending, the management of NHI pharmaceutical expenditure is becoming more difficult. METHODS: This study analyzed the data claimed to NHI for pharmaceutical reimbursement from 2010 to 2016. RESULTS: The policy implications with respect to the trends and problems in spending by drug groups were elicited. First, the proportion of off-patent drugs spending which were treated to chronic disease was much higher than anti-cancer drug spending. Second, the spending to the newly introduced high-costed medicine increased, however, current price-reduction mechanism was not sufficient to manage their expenditure efficiently. CONCLUSION: Our system seems to need several revisions to improve the efficiency of pharmaceutical expenditure and to cope with high-costed medicines. This study suggested that the prices of off-patent drugs need to be regularly readjusted and the Price-Volume Agreement System should be operated more flexibly as well.
Subject(s)
Atorvastatin , Chronic Disease , Health Expenditures , Imatinib Mesylate , Korea , National Health ProgramsABSTRACT
Background: AIDS is one of the most prevalent causes of death due to infectious origin which requires a lifelong therapy. There is variation in prices of antiretroviral drugs available in Indian market. Thus, a study was planned to find out variation in prices of antiretroviral drugs either as a single drug or in combination and to evaluate the difference in cost of various brands of the same antiretroviral drugs by calculating percentage variation in cost in Indian rupees. Methods: Cost of antiretroviral drugs manufactured by different pharmaceutical companies, in the same strength and dosage forms was obtained from “Current Index of Medical Specialties” July-October 2014 and “Indian Drug Review” Vol. XXI, Issue No. 4, 2014. The difference in the maximum and minimum price of the same drug manufactured by different pharmaceutical companies and percentage variation in cost was calculated. Results: Percentage variation in cost for antiretroviral drugs marketed in India was found to be zidovudine (100 mg) - 436%, lamivudine (100 mg) - 268%, tenofovir (300 mg) - 149.5%, didanosine (250 mg) - 73.75%, indinavir (400 mg) - 35.26%. Among the combination therapy, price variation was lamivudine + zidovudine (150 + 300 mg) - 314%, lamivudine + stavudine (150 + 40 mg) - 105%, lopinavir + ritonavir (133.3 + 33 mg) - 25%. Conclusion: There is wide variation in the prices of antiretroviral agents available in the market. Regulatory authorities, pharma companies, physicians should maximize their efforts to reduce the cost of drugs.
ABSTRACT
Pharmaceutical expenditure is rising globally. Most high-income countries have exercised pricing or purchasing strategies to address this pressure. Low- and middle-income countries ( LMICs) , however, usually have less regulated pharmaceutical markets and often lack feasible pricing or purchasing strategies, notwithstanding their wish to effectively manage medicine budgets. In high-income countries, most medicines payments are made by the state or health insurance institutions. In LMICs, most pharmaceutical expenditure is out-ofpocket which creates a dif-ferent dynamic for policy enforcement. The paucity of rigorous studies on the effectiveness of pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing strategies makes it especially difficult for policy makers in LMICs to decide on a course of action. This article reviews published articles on pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing policies. Many policy options for medicine pricing and purchasing have been found to work but they also have attendant risks. No one option is decisively pre-ferred;rather a mix of options may be required based on country-specific context. Empirical studies in LMICs are lacking. However, risks from any one policy option can reasonably be argued to be greater in LMICs which often lack strong legal systems, purchasing and state institutions to underpin the healthcare system. Key factors are identified to assist LMICs improve their medicine pricing and purchasing systems.