ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the value of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase‐contrast microscopy in identify source of hematuria .Methods A total of 98 patients diagnosed as hematuresis from December 2013 to May 2014 in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian Institute were enrolled in this study .Both the urinary sediment examination and phase‐contrast microscopy ex‐amination were conducted on the patients .According to clinical diagnosis results ,the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were calculated and compared .Results The sensitivity of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer (95 .3% ) was higher than that of the phase contrast microscope (81 .9% ) ,the difference was significant (P < 0 .05) ,while the specificity of phase contrast microscope (92 .3% ) was higher than that of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer(89 .2% ) ,the difference was significant(P < 0 .05) .Conclu‐sion Combining application of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase contrast microscope has great clinical significance .
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A significant improvement of imaging using synchrotron radiation (SR) is obtained by introducing phase-contrast technique. This technique provides greatly enhanced contrast and good soft tissue discrimination with high spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to observe microstructures of pathologic breast specimens including invasive breast cancer using phase-contrast technique with SR and to evaluate the feasibility of phase-contrast imaging in clinical application. METHODS: Phase-contrast microscopic image of normal breast tissue and the images of various breast diseases such as fibrocystic change, ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, Paget's disease were obtained using hard X-ray microscopy with an 11.1 keV monochromatic beam from SR source and CsI (TI) scintillation crystal. Zernike phase-shifter was adapted for phase-contrast hard X-ray microscopy. The visual image was magnified 20 times by microscopic objective lens and captured using a full frame charge-coupled device camera. Obtained images were compared with corresponding histopathologic findings in the optical microscopy. RESULTS: The SR images of various breast diseases were obtained with a good contrast and high visibility by phase-contrast technique. It was possible to observe the microstructures with high spatial resolution down to the micron region. The characteristic features of each disease were consistent with the histopathologic findings of corresponding sample and the images of breast cancer and the other diseases were distinct from each other. CONCLUSION: Using phase-contrast technique, SR images of various breast diseases including breast cancer were obtained. These images were comparable with standard histopathologic findings and showed different features for each disease. The results suggest that phase-contrast microscopic imaging with SR has potential as a diagnostic tool and also its clinical application is feasible, especially in breast imaging.
Subject(s)
Breast , Breast Diseases , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating , Discrimination, Psychological , Microscopy , Microscopy, Phase-Contrast , SynchrotronsABSTRACT
Introdução: A sedimentoscopia urinária com microscópio munido com contraste de fase (MCF) deveria ser a primeira etapa na determinação da origemdas hematúrias. Objetivo: Avaliar discrepâncias nas descrições dos parâmetros urinários relacionados à origem das hematúrias, comparando as descrições do nefrologista (Nef) e do profissional de análises clínicas (PAC). Métodos: Urinas de pacientes com glomerulopatias (GP) confirmadas por biópsia renal foram analisadas sob MCF, por um Nef e um PAC, ambos sem conhecimento prévio da origem das amostras. Cilindros hemáticos, acantocitúria ou células G1 >5% e dismorfismo eritrocitário foram utilizados na localização glomerular das hematúrias. Resultados: Dos 28 pacientes, 13 pacientes (46,4%) apresentavam glomerulonefrites não proliferativas e 15 (53,6%) glomerulonefrites proliferativas. Comparativamente ao PAC, o Nef identificou maior número de hemácias (mediana/mL de urina, 80.000 vs 4.800, p=0,001), maior número de cilindros hemáticos (39,3% vs 0%, p=0,001), maior freqüência de acantocitúria ou células G1 >5% (35,7% vs. 7,14%, p=0,021) e de dismorfismo eritrocitário (96,2% vs 7,14%, p<0,001). As discrepâncias dos resultados permaneceram após a separação das glomerulopatias em proliferativas e não proliferativas. Conclusão: Os parâmetros urinários que caracterizam a origem da hematúria foram mais freqüentemente identificados pelo nefrologista e sugerem que a urinálise, pela sua simplicidade e grande valor informativo, deveria ser incluída obrigatoriamente nos programas de treinamento em nefrologia.
Introduction: In the assessment of hematuria, the first step should be the identification of the origin of the bleeding, which can be done easily by analyzing the urine under phase-contrast microscopy. Obective: To assess the discrepancy of reports of the urinary parameters utilized in the localization of the glomerular origin of hematuria, comparing reports by the nephrologists and by the clinical laboratory technologist. Methods: Urines of patients with biopsy proven glomerulonephritis were assessed under phase-contrast microscopy by a nephrologist and a clinical laboratory technologist, both without previous knowledge of the origin of the samples. Red blood cell (RBC) casts, urinary acanthocytes or G1 cells >5%, and erithrocyte dysmorphism were used tolocalize the glomerular bleeding. Results: Among 28 patients, 13 (46.4%) had non proliferative glomerulonephritis and 15 (53.6%) had proliferative glomerulonephritis. Relatively to the clinical laboratory technologist, the nephrologist identified more RBC (median of 80.000 vs 4.800, p= 0.001), more RBC casts (39.3% vs 0%, p=0.001), more urinary acanthocytes or G1 cells >5% (35.7% vs 7.14%, p=0.021) and more dysmorphic RBC (96.2% vs 7.14%,p<0.001). The discrepancies of the reports were maintained after the separation of the glomerulonephritis in proliferative and non proliferative. Conclusion: The urinary parameters used in characterization of the origin of the hematuria were more frequently identified by the nephrologist, and suggest that the urinalysis, a simple and very informative test, should be mandatory in programs of training in nephrology.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Acanthocytes , Hematuria/diagnosis , Sediments/analysis , Urine , Microscopy, Phase-ContrastABSTRACT
Differentiation of renal(RH) and non-renal(NRH) hematuria is important in the diagnosis and treatment of the patients with hematuria. Recently, urine RBC immunoperoxidase(IPx) staining method was developed, but there was no report on the usefulness of IPx in Korea. We validated the usefulness of IPx by comparing with the PCM. Both PCM and IPx were performed at the same time in 26 patients with RH confirmed by renal biopsy and 23 patients with NRH confirmed by radiologic and/or pathologic studies who were admitted to Chungbuk National University Hospital from January 1996 to December 1996. The age of RH and NRH group were 36.6+/-15.0 and 56.5+/-22.2 years. 35.7+/-30.4% of urine RBC were stained by IPx in RH group and only 1.6+/-4.4% were stained in NRH group(P<0.001). 23.4+/-29.9% of urine RBC by PCM were counted as dysmorphic RBC in RH group and 5.7+/-13.6% were counted in NRH group(P<0.05). At the cut-off value of 20%, the sensitivity and specificity of IPx were 57.7% and 100%. At the cut-off value of 30%, those of PCM were 30.9% and 95.7%, respectively. When comparing overall test performance by calculating AUCs of ROC(receiver operating characteristics) curve, IPx was better than PCM. IPx was better than PCM in localizing the origin of hematuria. The NRH might be excluded when IPx(+) cells are more than 20% of total urine RBC.