ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Avaliar rugosidade superficial (RS), estabilidade de cor (EC) e morfologia de superfície (MS) de um compósito nanoparticulado após diferentes protocolos de acabamento/ polimento com ou sem irrigação. Material e métodos: Cem espécimes foram confeccionados e divididos em 10 grupos (n=10) conforme protocolo de acabamento/polimento: Tira de poliéster; discos abrasivos (DA); DA+espirais (DAE); DA+multi- -laminada+espirais (DAME); espirais (E); e nenhum polimento. Protocolos com DA, DAE, DAME, e E foram realizados a seco e com irrigação. Após acabamento/polimento, os espécimes foram armazenados em água destilada à 37°C. Durante 14 dias, cinco espécimes de cada grupo foram imersos em café por 5min/dia. A EC foi analisada com Espectrofotômetro (CIEL*a*b*) 0, 7 e 14 dias após armazenamento em água ou imersão em café. A RS foi analisada com Rugosímetro (parâmetro Ra) e MS foi analisada com Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV). ANOVA, Tukey e Teste T foram realizados para comparações entre os grupos (α=0,05). Resultados: A irrigação promoveu maior EC nos protocolos DAE e E. Os diferentes protocolos promoveram variação de cor semelhante após 14 dias de armazenamento em água. O protocolo E a seco promoveu os maiores valores RS, sendo inferior ao grupo DAME, que promoveu menor rugosidade e foi semelhante aos demais protocolos. Para DAME e E a irrigação foi significativa para diminuir a rugosidade. Na análise por MEV, E com irrigação apresentaram maior lisura superficial. Conclusão: A irrigação durante acabamento/polimento influencia na EC, RS e MS de compósitos. Os protocolos de acabamento/ polimento DAME e E com irrigação foram mais efetivos.
Aim: to evaluate the surface roughness (SR), color stability (CE) and surface morphology (SM) of a nanofilled composite resin exposed to different finishing/ polishing protocols with or without irrigation. Material and methods: One hundred specimens were prepared and divided into 10 groups (n = 10) according to the finishing/polishing protocol: positive control; abrasive discs (AD); AD + spirals (ADS); AD + multi-laminated + spirals (ADMS); spirals (S); and none. Protocols with AD; ADS; ADMS and S were performed to dry or with irrigation. After finishing/ polishing, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37 ° C. For 14 days, five samples of each group were immersed in coffee for 5min/day. The other samples have been stored in water. The CE of the samples was analyzed with Spectrophotometer (CIEL * a * b *) 0, 7 and 14 days after storage in water or coffee. The SR was analyzed with the Rugosimeter and the SM was analyzed with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). ANOVA, Tukey and T-test were performed for comparisons between the groups (α=0,05). Results: Irrigation offered higher EC in the ADS and S groups. The benefits of color variation are after 14 days. The use of dry spirals promoted the highest SR values, being lower in the ADMS group, which promoted less roughness and was similar to the other protocols. For ADMS and S the irrigation was significant to decrease the roughness. Analysis by MEV, spirals with irrigation greater superficial smoothness. Conclusion: Irrigation during finishing/polishing influences the CS, SR and SM of composites. The finishing/polishing protocols with ADMS and S with irrigation were more effective.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics polished with different techniques and to determine the effectiveness of the polishing techniques on resin-ceramics, comparing it with that of a glazed glass-ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different CAD/CAM ceramics (feldspathic ceramic: C-CEREC Blocs, (SIRONA) and three resin-ceramics: L-Lava Ultimate, (3M ESPE), E-Enamic, (VITA) and CS-CeraSmart, (GC)) and one light cure composite resin: ME-Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (Kuraray) were used. Only C samples were glazed (gl). Other restorations were divided into four groups according to the polishing technique: nonpolished control group (c), a group polished with light cure liquid polish (Biscover LV BISCO) (bb), a group polished with ceramic polishing kit (Diapol, EVE) (cd), and a group polished with composite polishing kit (Clearfil Twist Dia, Kuraray) (kc). Glazed C samples and the polished samples were further divided into four subgroups and immersed into different solutions: distilled water, tea, coffee, and fermented black carrot juice. Eight samples (8 × 8 × 1 mm) were prepared for each subgroup. According to CIELab system, four color measurements were made: before immersion, immersion after 1 day, after 1 week, and after 1 month. Data were analyzed with repeated measures of ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS: The highest staining resistance was found in gl samples. There was no difference among gl, kc and cd (P>.05). Staining resistance of gl was significantly higher than that of bb (P<.05). Staining resistances of E and CS were significantly higher than those of L and ME (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Ceramic and composite polishing kits can be used for resin ceramics as a counterpart of glazing procedure used for full ceramic materials. Liquid polish has limited indications for resin ceramics.
Subject(s)
Ceramics , Coffee , Daucus carota , Immersion , Tea , WaterABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-five cylindirical specimens (15x2 mm) were prepared for each feldspathic (Vita VMK 95, Ceramco III) and low-fusing dental porcelain (Matchmaker). Fifty-five specimens of machinable feldspathic porcelain blocks (Vitablocs Mark II), (12x14x18 mm) were cut into 2-mm-thick slices (12x14 mm) with low speed saw. The prepared specimens were divided into 11 groups (n=5) representing different polishing techniques including control ((C) no surface treatment), glaze (G) and other 9 groups that were finished and polished with polishing discs (Sof-Lex) (Sl), two porcelain polishing kits (NTI (Pk), Dialite II (Di)), a diamond polishing paste (Sparkle) (Sp), a zirconium silicate based cleaning and polishing prophy paste (Zircate) (Zr), an aluminum oxide polishing paste (Prisma Gloss) (Pg), and combinations of them. The surface roughness of all groups was measured with a profilometer. The data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance, and the mean values were compared by the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test (a=0.05). RESULTS: For all porcelain material groups, the lowest Ra values were observed in Group Gl, Group Sl, Group Pk, and Group Di, which were not significantly different from each other (p>0.05).When comparing the 4 different porcelain materials, the machinable feldspathic porcelain block group (Mark II) demonstrated statistically significantly less Ra values than the other porcelain materials tested (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the VMK 95 and Ceramco III porcelain groups (p=0.919), also these groups demonstrated the highest Ra values. CONCLUSION: Subjected to surface roughness, the surfaces obtained with polishing and/or cleaning-prophy paste materials used alone were rougher compared to the surfaces finished using Sof-lex, Dialite, ...
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Dental Polishing/instrumentation , Diamond/chemistry , Materials Testing , Potassium Compounds/chemistry , Surface Properties , Silicates/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistryABSTRACT
Purpose: This in vitro study compared the effect of four different polishing methods on the surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain. Methods: Forty disc-shaped specimens were fabricated with a feldspathic porcelain (Super Porcelain EX3), glazed, and randomly divided into 4 experimental groups and 1 control group (n=8/group). For the experimental groups, the glazed layer was ground with a diamond rotary instrument, and the surface was polished with: rubber points (Edenta), steel finishing burs (Meisinger), silicon rubber point (Shofu) + diamond felt wheel (FGM) + diamond paste (Diamond Excel, FGM), or aluminum oxide discs (Sof-Lex, 3M-ESPE) + diamond felt wheel + diamond paste. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured profilometrically. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (α=5%). Results: The Ra values were not statistically different among the four polishing groups (P>0.05). All polishing groups had significantly higher mean Ra values than the control glazed specimens (P<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the results indicate that the tested polishing techniques were not able to provide a porcelain surface as smooth as the glazed surface.
Objetivo: Este estudo in vitro comparou o efeito de quatro métodos de polimento sobre a rugosidade superficial de uma porcelana feldspática. Metodologia: Quarenta discos de porcelana (Super Porcelain EX3) foram confeccionados, glazeados e divididos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos experimentais e 1 grupo controle (n=8/grupo). Nos grupos experimentais, a camada de glaze foi removida com ponta diamantada e as superfícies desgastadas foram polidas com: pontas de borracha (Edenta), brocas multilaminadas (Meisinger), pontas siliconadas (Shofu) + disco de feltro Diamond (FGM) + pasta diamantada (Diamond Excel, FGM), ou discos de óxido de alumínio (Sof-Lex, 3M-ESPE) + disco de feltro Diamond + pasta diamantada. A rugosidade superficial (Ra) foi medida com um rugosímetro. Os dados analisados por análise de variância e teste de Tukey (α=5%). Resultados: Os valores Ra não foram estatisticamente diferentes entre os quatro grupos com polimento (P>0,05). Todos os grupos experimentais com polimento apresentaram valores de Ra significativamente maiores que os espécimes glazeados do grupo controle (P<0,001). Conclusão: Dentro das limitações do estudo, os resultados indicaram que as técnicas de polimento utilizadas não foram capazes de produzir uma superfície tão lisa quanto a superfície glazeada.