Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1790-1792, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-803349

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the application effect of improved drainage bag carrying method in the nursing of biliary drainage tube.@*Methods@#Sixty-five patients with biliary drainage tube were divided into two groups by convenient sampling. There were 33 cases in the control group and 32 cases in the observation group. When going out of bed, the observation group used the improved drainage bag carrying method to carry the drainage bag, and the control group used the traditional hand-held method or the S-hook external drainage bag. The catheter drainage failure rate, decoupling rate, retrograde infection rate, and satisfaction of tube activity in the two groups were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#There were no significant differences in catheter drainage failure rate, decoupling rate and retrograde infection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction of the tube with the improved drainage bag carrying method was (10.22±0.94) points, while (7.36±1.03) points in the contrast group. There was statistically significance between the two groups (t=11.685, P< 0.05).@*Conclusion@#The improved drainage bag carrying method has improved the quality of care in the department of catheter care, and the patient′s satisfaction with the nursing staff has also been improved.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1790-1792, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-752730

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the application effect of improved drainage bag carrying method in the nursing of biliary drainage tube. Methods Sixty-five patients with biliary drainage tube were divided into two groups by convenient sampling. There were 33 cases in the control group and 32 cases in the observation group. When going out of bed, the observation group used the improved drainage bag carrying method to carry the drainage bag, and the control group used the traditional hand-held method or the S-hook external drainage bag. The catheter drainage failure rate, decoupling rate, retrograde infection rate, and satisfaction of tube activity in the two groups were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in catheter drainage failure rate, decoupling rate and retrograde infection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction of the tube with the improved drainage bag carrying method was (10.22±0.94) points, while (7.36±1.03) points in the contrast group. There was statistically significance between the two groups (t=11.685, P< 0.05). Conclusion The improved drainage bag carrying method has improved the quality of care in the department of catheter care, and the patient′s satisfaction with the nursing staff has also been improved.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL