One-Step Ventro-Posterior Fusion via Transpedicular Approach for L1 Burst Fracture by Use of Expandable Cage

Accepted methods of treatment of lumbar burst fractures include conservative therapy, posterior reduction and instrumentation, and anterior decompression and instrumentation. Surgery aims at the correction of the kyphotic deformity and at the decompression of the spinal cord thereby reducing pain and allowing early patient mobilization. Posterior-only procedures usually rely on ligamentotaxis or manual tamping of bone fragments for decompression of the spinal canal. Transpedicular corpectomy allow for circumferential surgery through a single posterior approach. The authors use an expandable cage to restore the normal spinal curvature and to prevent the kyphotic deformity.

A Biomechanical Comparison among Three Surgical Methods in Bilateral Subaxial Cervical Facet Dislocation

OBJECTIVE: The biomechanical stabilities between the anterior plate fixation after anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDFP) and the posterior transpedicular fixation after ACDF(ACDFTP) have not been compared using human cadaver in bilateral cervical facet dislocation. The purpose of this study is to compare the stability of ACDFP, a posterior wiring procedure after ACDFP(ACDFPW), and ACDFTP for treatment of bilateral cervical facet dislocation. METHODS: Ten human spines(C3-T1) were tested in the following sequence: the intact state, after ACDFP(Group 1), ACDFPW(Group 2), and ACDFTP(Group 3). Intervertebral motions were measured by a video-based motion capture system. The range of motion(ROM) and neutral zone(NZ) were compared for each loading mode to a maximum of 2.0Nm. RESULTS: ROMs for Group 1 were below that of the intact spine in all loading modes, with statistical significance in flexion and extension, but NZs were decreased in flexion and extension and slightly increased in bending and axial rotation without significances. Group 2 produced additional stability in axial rotation of ROM and in flexion of NZ than Group 1 with significance. Group 3 provided better stability than Group 1 in bending and axial rotation, and better stability than Group 2 in bending of both ROM and NZ. There was no significant difference in extension modes for the three Groups. CONCLUSION: ACDFTP(Group 3) demonstrates the most effective stabilization followed by ACDFPW(Group 2), and ACDFP(Group 1). ACDFP provides sufficient strength in most loading modes, ACDFP can provide an effective stabilization for bilateral cervical facet dislocation with a brace.

Operative Treatment for Hangman Fracture of the Axis: Review of Fixation Methods and Indications / 대한척추외과학회지

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the surgical indications and to compare the results of the anterior plate fixation and transpedicular fixation in cases of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 2001, eighteen of 26 cases of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis were treated by anterior plate fixation and 8 of 26 by transpedicular screw fixation. Two of 8 cases received unilateral screw fixation and 6bilateral fixation. Two cases of the transpedicular screw fixation group were treated by additional posterior plate fixation. Oper-ativeindication was an unstable fracture, namely, with over 3.5 mm of anterior displacement, over 10 degrees of angulation, i.e., Levine types II, IIA, III, and IA. Postoperatively, Philadelphia orthosis or a soft collar was applied for 6 to 8 weeks. RESULTS: All cases achieved bone union. One case of neck pain, three cases of neck motion limitation and three cases of a kyphotic deformity exceeding 10degrees were observed in the posterior transpedicular screw fixation group. In terms of surgical complications, two cases of transient dysphagia were observed in the anterior plate fixation group and two cases of screw malposition in the transpedicular screw fixation group. The transpedicular screw fixation technique has some associated problems, such as a large operative wound scar, a large bleeding volume, and technical difficulty. CONCLUSION: Both the anterior plate fixation and transpedicular screw fixation methods are useful treatment methods for Levine type II, IIA and III hangman fracture for early bone union and early rehabilitation. The anterior plate fixation technique is easi-er and has fewer complications than posterior transpedicular screw fixation, therefore, the ranspedicular screw fixation method should be confined to the management of type IA fracture with rotational displacement.