ABSTRACT
Background: The rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is provided through anti-rabies clinics in the country. It was considered important to assess their facilities under a nationwide multi-centric survey. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the facilities available for PEP at the anti-rabies clinics and to ascertain the PEP provided at the anti-rabies clinics. Methods: The cross-sectional assessment was made from May 2017 to January 2018 in selected seven states of India. Thirty-five anti-rabies clinics from both Government and private; urban and rural areas from the states were assessed by an expert team using a pretested checklist for facilities and services available for PEP. Results: On an average, 10 new animal bite cases were attended at each anti-rabies clinic per day. The cold chain facilities for rabies biologicals were satisfactory. The facilities for wound washing (54.3%) and the use of antiseptics to animal bite wounds were not adequate. Rabies vaccines were administered by intramuscular in 54.3% and by intradermal route in 45.7% of the cases. The vaccine stock-outs were reported only in the government sector (18.5%). The type of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) used was equine (63.2%) and human (36.8%); given free of cost in 40% of Anti rabies clinics. The local wound infiltration of RIG was in practice at 58.6% of anti-rabies clinics. The stock-out of RIG was more in private (50%) hospitals than in Government (40.7%) hospitals. Conclusion: The facilities available for PEP at the anti-rabies clinics were inadequate and have to be improved across the country.
ABSTRACT
Background: In rabies endemic countries, where every animal bite is potentially a suspected rabid exposure, the exposed individuals should seek early and proper health care. It is also essential to complete the full course of postexposure vaccination to protect against rabies. Objectives: The study aimed at determining the health-seeking behavior of animal bite victims; assessing the perceived risk of rabies transmission from different animals and knowledge on its prevention and finding out the compliance to complete course of rabies vaccination and associated factors. Methods: A multi-centric, health facility-based survey was conducted during May 2017 to January 2018 in six regional-representative states involving 18 health facilities. Study participants were animal bite victims attending the health facilities. The data from all the study participants across the country were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test to find out the association of factors influencing compliance. Results: Among a total of 529 animal bite victims, 83.6% sought postexposure prophylaxis coming directly to health facility; others visited nonallopathic/traditional healers/veterinarians/Auxiliary Nursing Midwifery before coming to health facility. The perceived risk of disease transmission and knowledge on the prevention of rabies was insufficient among the exposed victims. All participants were started with anti-rabies vaccination; the compliance rate for the full course of intramuscular rabies vaccination was 65.9% and for intra-dermal rabies vaccination, it was 85.1%. Among Category III exposures, only 46.2% received rabies immunoglobulin. Conclusions: Health-seeking behavior and compliance to complete course of anti-rabies vaccination is unsatisfactory, which has to be improved to prevent rabies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rabies is a 100% fatal disease. There are inadequate data on animal exposures and rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) from community-based field surveys in India. Objectives: The main objective of the study is to estimate the incidence of animal exposures (bite, scratch, or lick) in the study population and to describe the rabies PEP among the cases. Methods: A descriptive survey was conducted in seven states of India between July and November, 2017. In each state, multistage sampling methodology was followed for selection of district, taluka/tehsil, block, and clusters within the block. The primary sampling unit was a household (HH). A case was a patient with animal exposure (bite, scratch, or lick) in the last 1 year from the date of survey. The animal exposure was categorized based on the WHO guidelines (Category-I, Category-II, and Category-III). The patients with the history of multiple animal exposures any time during the survey period was considered as a single case. Results: A total of 1012 HHs were surveyed covering a population of 4294. 3016 (70.2%) participants were from rural settings and 1278 (29.8%) were living in urban settings. 2181 (50.8%) participants were male and 2113 (49.2%) were female. The annual incidence of animal exposure was 1.26% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.93%�59%). The annual incidence in urban setting was 1.33% (0.70 - 1.96) and rural settings were 1.23% (CI: 0.84 - 1.62). Majority (68.5%) of the cases were from rural settings, 61.2% of the cases were in the age group of 15� years. Among the 43 cases who had received PEP, 21 had Category-II exposures, of whom 66.7% had completed vaccination with either five doses intramuscular or four doses intradermal route. Similarly, 22 had Category-III exposures and only 4 (18.2%) cases had received rabies immunoglobulin and completed rabies vaccination. Six ( 11.1%) cases did not receive PEP. There was no report of human rabies case. Conclusion: The incidence of animal exposure was 1.26%. Rabies PEP in the cases was not satisfactory.
ABSTRACT
National Rabies Control Programme, India, is in operation since 2012�13 without much impact due to poor funding and no set policy for the rabies prevention and control. An effort was made to develop a draft policy paper which can help the Government of India to develop a national rabies vaccination policy for humans and for achieving the goal of zero dog-mediated human rabies deaths by the year 2030. A technical stakeholders meeting was held under the chairmanship of the Drug Controller General of India at New Delhi in December 2017 to discuss the problems and solutions for providing essential rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). The following problems and dilemmas were identified: frequent shortages of life-saving rabies vaccines and rabies immunoglobulin for PEP; as rabies vaccines are mostly procured by the state governments that often face resource crunch and hurdles in logistics within the states; production levels of rabies biologicals in the public sector are low; and the export of rabies biologicals from the private sector needs to be critically evaluated in the context of frequent stock-outs in the domestic market and also the national vaccine security.
ABSTRACT
The expenditure for rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is substantial, especially for the poor who are affected the most. The present study was conducted to determine the cost incurred to a patient and the healthcare facility for providing PEP in different healthcare settings. A multicentric, health facility-based study was conducted from May 2017 to January 2018 in the six states involving 18 healthcare facilities. The study included 529 animal bite cases; most of them belonged to either category III (54.4%) or category II (43.1%) exposures and all of them received complete PEP. The total median cost incurred to the patients for complete PEP in the government health facility was INR 1400 (USD 22) and in private hospitals was INR 3685 (USD 58). The cost of PEP for the bite victims is considerable; therefore, it has to be provided free of charge at all healthcare facilities.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: Exposures to sharps injuries occurring in the community are relatively frequent. We describe characteristics of community sharp exposures reported in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 1997 to 2010. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of exposure reports to sharps in the community reported to a surveillance system, designed for health care workers, of the Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. The characteristics of exposed individuals analyzed included types of exposure, the circumstances of the accident, and the prophylaxis offered. Results: 582 exposures were studied. Median age was 30 years and 83 (14%) involved children with less than 10 years of age. Two hundred and seventeen (37%) occurred with sharps found in the streets. The exposure was percutaneous in 515 (89%) and needles where involved in 406 (70%) of them. The sharps were present in the trash in 227 (39%) or in the environment in 167 (29%) of the reports. Professionals who work with frequent contact with domestic or urban waste were 196 (38%). The source was known in 112 (19%) of the exposures and blood was involved in 269 (46%). Only 101 (19%) of the injured subjects reported a complete course of vaccination for hepatitis B. Antiretroviral prophylaxis was prescribed for 392 (68%) of the exposed subjects. Conclusions: Sharps injuries occurring in the community are an important health problem. A great proportion would be avoided if practices on how to dispose needles and sharps used outside health units were implemented.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Waste Products/adverse effects , Brazil/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Needles/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate preexposure prophylaxis and postexposure prophylaxis of rabies that the National Medical Center (NMC) handled and to check whether appropriate measures were performed according to the recent domestic and overseas guidelines after animal bites. METHODS: This study surveyed 41 people who were 18 years or under and received preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis of rabies at the NMC from November 2006 to December 2011. Their medical records were reviewed for their age, gender, the reason for preexposure prophylaxis, the body sites of animal bite, the kind of the animal that bit children, the region where the biting occurred and rabies vaccination and inoculation of immunoglobulin. RESULTS: Eleven children took rabies vaccination for preexposure prophylaxis and 30 children received post exposure prophylaxis of rabies. Of patients who were bitten by unvaccinated animals including wild animals or by animals which were not certain to be vaccinated, 50% (13 of 26 children) received postexposure prophylaxis, while 75% (3 of 4 children) of patients who were bitten by vaccinated animals received postexposure prophylaxis of rabies. Ten of 30 bitten patients knew whether or not the biting animals had received rabies vaccination. Of them, four people (40%) were bitten by animals which had received rabies vaccination. CONCLUSION: To prevent the occurrence of rabies, people and health care providers need to correctly understand latest guideline for rabies preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis and the information for bitten patient, biting animal and area at bitten by animal should be accurately recorded.
Subject(s)
Animals , Child , Humans , Animals, Wild , Bites and Stings , Child Health , Health Personnel , Isothiocyanates , Medical Records , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Rabies , VaccinationABSTRACT
Objective To better understand the treament effect of postexposure after biting by dogs and other animals in,Cixi city,and to provide evidence for rabies control.Methods The people,who were bitten by dogs and other animals,were investigated.All related information was collected such as the date and site of bite,animal species,postexposure treatment including vaccination and anti-rabies serum or human anti-rabies immune globulin.Results Total 21,504 cases had received the postexposure treatment from January to September in 2007.Among 21,504 people,95% were attributed to dog bites.62% of people had received the treatment within 12 hours after exposure.All people had received five doses of vaccine.Total 783 people had been administered anti-rabies serum.Furthermore,no sever side effect and rabies cases occurred among these people.Conclusions The injury caused by dogs was still a major potential factor to cause rabies in the rabies endemic area.The timely and correct postexposure treatment with good quality of vaccine could prevent from rabies.
ABSTRACT
The prevention of HIV infection is based on strategies that interrupt sexual, blood-borne, and perinatal transmission of the virus. Post-exposure prophylaxis using anti-retroviral therapy is recommended in case of mucosa or injured skin when exposed to blood, semen, vaginal/anal secretion, breast milk, or body fluid containing visible blood within no more than 72 hours. The combination of antiretroviral prophylaxis, elective caesarean delivery, and avoidance of breast feeding has reduced perinatal transmission to less than 2%. Because prophylactic chemotherapy does not guarantee perfect prevention and the adverse effects or toxicity of the drugs are considerably high, a subject who is willing to continue on with the highly risky behavior would not be a proper candidate for post-exposure prophylaxis. There is no evidence that a three-drug regimen is more likely to be effective than a two-drug regimen; however, the recommendation of a three-drug regimen is based on the assumption that the maximal suppression of viral replication will provide the best chance of preventing infection. The most frequently administered regimen is zidovudine (600 mg per day in two or three divided doses) and lamivudine (150 mg orally twice a day) for 4 weeks, with or without the addition of a protease inhibitor in selected cases.
Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Breast Feeding , Drug Therapy , HIV Infections , Lamivudine , Milk, Human , Mucous Membrane , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Protease Inhibitors , Semen , Skin , ZidovudineABSTRACT
The incidence of AIDS and related disorders continues to rise sharply these days and anesthesologists may expect to encounter such patients more and more frequently during the performance of routine procedures on the seemingly healthy and during indicated procedures on the sick. AIDS is a disease for which there is no cure, and thus prevention becomes even more important. However, the dangers of this disorder should not be exaggerated. We experienced one case of a subcutaneous injury during spinal anesthesia caused by a stylet of an infected asymptomatic carrier. Postexposure prophylaxis was performed with zidobudine and lamibudine, and enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA) testing for medical personnel has been repeated three times during last 6 months.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Spinal , HIV , Immunoassay , Incidence , Needlestick Injuries , Post-Exposure ProphylaxisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As of 30 September 2001, a total of 1,515 human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) infected persons has been reported in Korea. The number of newly infected persons tends to increase year by year, with the result that the contacts between HIV infected persons and health care workers (HCW) become more frequent. This survey was to investigate the current state of occupational HIV exposure and postexposure management among HCW in Korea. METHODS: We surveyed retrospectively the cases of occupational HIV exposure reported until the first half of 2001, in total 14 tertiary teaching hospitals. We reviewed these cases for the details about ; i) exposure type. medium and depth of injuty, ii) postexposure prophylaxis(PEP) and follow up serologic test and iii) source patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight cases(65% female, no pregnant woman) of occupational HIV exposure were identified. The number of cases tends to increase rapidly in recent two years. The majority of the exposure occurred in nurses and doctors, after percutaneous needle stick injury. The mean time from exposure to administration of PEP drugs was 20 hours. Of 39 cases receiving the PEP drug, 62% completed all of the drugs as initially prescribed and 31% discontinued all PEP drugs. The reasons for discontinuation included adverse events(9 cases), health care provider judgment(1case), and source patient HIV negative(1case). There was at least one adverse event in 59% of cases receiving the PEP drugs. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea. vomiting, anorexia, and indigestion. So far. there has been no HCW infected with HIV via occupational exposure. Conelusion: Although primary prevention remains the best strategy for protecting HCW from occupational HIV transmission, exposures are nevertheless likely to occur. Systematized PEP programs that include written protocols for prompt reporting, evaluation, counseling, treatment. and follow-up of occupational exposures will be needed for the secondary prevention.