Comparison of 3 evaluation criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To analyze the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication （PIM） in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures at admission and compare the concordance of 3 evaluation criteria. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to review the data of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to the Department of Orthopedics in Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital from July 2022 to June 2023. The PIMs were identified according to the Criteria of Potentially Inappropriate Medications for Older Adults in China：2017 edition （hereinafter referred to as Chinese criteria）， American Geriatrics Society 2023 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Adults （hereinafter referred to as 2023 Beers criteria）， third version criteria for screening tool of older people’s prescriptions for potentially inappropriate medication （hereinafter referred to as STOPP criteria version 3）. The concordance of the 3 evaluation criteria was compared by using Kappa statistics. RESULTS A total of 246 patients were included in this study； 49 patients （19.92%） with 77 PIMs were detected by the Chinese criteria， 64 patients （26.02%） with 118 PIMs were detected by the 2023 Beers criteria， and 41 patients （16.67%） with 67 PIMs were detected by the STOPP criteria version 3； 22 patients met all three criteria simultaneously. The concordance among the three criteria showed moderate agreement （0.417≤Kappa≤0.486） when compared in pairs. CONCLUSIONS There are certain differences in the PIM evaluated by the three criteria， but the prevalence of PIMs is below 30% according to the different H202134） criteria. Benzodiazepines， antipsychotics， antidepressants， and other drugs may increase the risk of patients falling again.

Polifarmácia, medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados e a vulnerabilidade de pessoas idosas / Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and the vulnerability of older adults

Resumo Objetivo Analisar a frequência de polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) segundo os Critérios de Beers e CBMPI em pessoas idosas com vulnerabilidade clínico-funcional. Método Trata-se de um estudo transversal onde analisou-se os prontuários de 496 participantes com 60 anos ou mais, atendidos em primeira consulta em uma Policlínica Gerontológica. Os dados sociodemográficos, medicamentos, e o Índice de Vulnerabilidade Clínico Funcional 20 (IVCF-20) e quedas foram extraídos dos prontuários. A polifarmácia foi definida como o uso simultâneo de cinco ou mais medicamentos. Os participantes foram classificados em três grupos: robusto, em risco e vulnerável. Resultados A análise demonstrou que 69 (13,91%) dos participantes faziam uso de polifarmácia. Entre os usuários de polifarmácia, 40 (57,97%) faziam uso de pelo menos um MPI. Os MPIs mais encontrados foram a glibenclamida e o omeprazol, respectivamente. Pessoas idosas com vulnerabilidade apresentaram um risco três vezes maior de apresentar polifarmácia (RP 3,59; IC95% 2,109-6,092). Conclusão O uso de polifarmácia e MPI neste estudo estavam associados à vulnerabilidade da pessoa idosa, reforçando a necessidade de avaliação criteriosa de prescrições medicamentosas para essa população.

Abstract Objective To analyze the frequency of polypharmacy and the prescription of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) according to the Beers Criteria and CBMPI in older adults with clinical-functional vulnerability. Method This is a cross-sectional study where the medical records of 496 participants aged 60 and older, seen in their first appointment at a Gerontological Polyclinic, were analyzed. Sociodemographic data, medications, the Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 (IVCF-20), and falls were extracted from the medical records. Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use of five or more medications. Participants were classified into three groups: robust, at risk, and vulnerable. Results The analysis revealed that 69 (13.91%) participants were using polypharmacy. Among polypharmacy users, 40 (57.97%) were using at least one PIM. The most commonly found PIM were glibenclamide and omeprazole, respectively. Older adults with vulnerability were three times more likely to have polypharmacy (OR 3.59; 95% CI 2.109-6.092). Conclusion The use of polypharmacy and PIM in this study was associated with the vulnerability of older adults, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation of medication prescriptions for this population.

Potentially inappropriate medications with older people in intensive care and associated factors: a historic cohort study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in critical care units remains limited, especially in terms of the factors associated with their use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and factors associated with PIMs use in intensive care units. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study was conducted in a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 314 patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. The dates were extracted from a "Patient Safety Project" database. A Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess which factors were associated with PIMs. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: According to Beers' criteria, 12.8% of the identified drugs were considered inappropriate for the elderly population. The incidence rate of PIMs use was 45.8%. The most frequently used PIMs were metoclopramide, insulin, antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and benzodiazepines. Factors associated with PIMs use were the number of medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17), length of hospital stay (OR = 1.07), and excessive potential drug interactions (OR = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the older adults in ICUs received PIM. Patients taking PIMs had a longer length of stay in the ICU, higher numbers of medications, and higher numbers of potential drug interactions. In ICUs, the use of explicit methods combined with clinical judgment can contribute to the safety and quality of medication prescriptions.

Research hotspots and trends on potentially inappropriate medication from 2012 to 2021 / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the progress of potentially inappropriate medication （PIM） research by means of bibliometrics， and to predict the hotspots and trends of PIM， so as to provide reference for PIM research in China. METHODS The research literature related to PIM were searched from Web of Science core database， and the publication trend of the literature was analyzed on the bibliometric online analysis platform and CiteSpace 5.8.R3 software. The research results were visualized and analyzed， and the research hotspots of PIM were summarized through gCLUTO. RESULTS About PIM research， the annual number of the literature issued from 2012 to 2021 showed a continuous growth trend totally； the United States had the largest number of literature （241 pieces）； the University of Sydney in Australia was the research institution with the largest number of literature （59 pieces）； O’Mahony D from University College Cork， Ireland， published the most literature （23 pieces）； the research of PIM involved 57 disciplines， among which there was the largest number of literature about gerontology （384 pieces）； International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy was the journal with the largest number of literature （61 pieces）； Journal of the American Geriatrics Society was cited most frequently （1 197 times）. The hotspots of PIM research mainly focused on seven aspects： the standard of PIM， the safety and economy research of PIM， the risk factors research of PIM， the PIM research of chronic patients， the PIM research of antipsychotics， the research of pharmacists’ participation in PIM management， and the PIM research about palliative care of tumor patients. CONCLUSIONS The heat of research on PIM has been on the rise， and there is little cooperation between countries and institutions， and more cooperation is needed. In the future， the focus of Chinese pharmacists’ research on PIM may be on the deep localization of PIM standards， PIM intervention and precise medication guidance， and PIM management of specific diseases and drugs.

Status quo of knowledge, attitudes and practice of general practitioners on potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly in Shanxi Province and relevant factors / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective:To investigate the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practice of general practitioners on potentially inappropriate medication(PIM)in the elders in Shanxi Province and to explore its relevant factors.Methods:A cross-sectional survey on knowledge, attitudes and practice of general practitioners on PIM in the elders was conducted from January to February 2021. A self-designed questionnaire was used for the survey, which included the basic information of general practitioners and the knowledge, attitudes and practice of elderly PIM. The convenient sampling method was used to select 16 primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals from the general practice alliance units in Shanxi Province, and 257 general practitioners in the selected hospital were recruited as the research objects. The related factors were investigated by univariate regression and multiple stepwise linear regression analyses.Results:A total of 257 questionnaires were distributed, and 248 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective rate of 96.5%. The scores of elderly PIM knowledge, attitudes and behavior of 248 general practitioners were (31.4±9.2), (32.9±4.6) and (34.9±8.3), respectively, with the scoring rates of 62.8% (31.4/50.0), 82.3% (32.9/40.0) and 69.8% (34.9/50.0). The total score was (99.2±16.3), and the total score rate was 70.9% (99.2/140.0). There was a statistically significant difference in the total score of elderly PIM knowledge, attitudes and practice among general practitioners with different educational background, work units, professional title, awareness level of PIM and needs for PIM training( F=6.14,4.39 and 5.38, t=2.97 and 2.62, all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that general practitioners with undergraduate and graduate education and higher professional titles had better knowledge, attitudes and practice of PIM ( t=2.69, 2.98 and 2.36, all P<0.05), and general practitioners without knowledge of PIM and no needs for PIM training had worse knowledge, attitudes and practice of PIM ( t=-2.96 and -2.09, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The knowledge, attitudes and behavior intervention of general practitioners on elderly PIM needs to be improved. It is necessary to strengthen the elderly PIM knowledge and skill training for general practitioners with low educational background, lower professional titles without awareness and training of PIM.

Research progress on coping strategies of unreasonable drug use in the elderly / 中华老年医学杂志

Irrational drug use is common and inevitable in the elderly population, which leads to the occurrence of adverse drug reactions, the increase of hospital readmission rate and related mortality rate, and the increase of medical economic burden.Therefore, it is imperative to reduce irrational drug use, and the standardized drug prescription has become a new challenge for clinicians and pharmacists.Accurate detection method of irrational drug use, practical and effective drug use scheme, and intervention measures are the key to guide rational drug use in clinical practice.Mainly in terms of risk factors of irrational drug use, the status quo and its coping strategies, this paper reviews the research status at home and abroad in order to reduce irrational drug use in the elderly, reduce drug risk, and improve medication environment for the elderly.

Analysis of influential factors for potentially inappropriate medication in elderly cancer patients / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To analyze the influential factors for potentially inappropriate medication （PIM） in elderly cancer patients. METHODS The data of elderly cancer patients hospitalized in a hospital from January to December 2021 were collected. According to the Beers standard of the American Geriatrics Society in 2019 （hereinafter referred to as the “2019 version of Beers standard”） and Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Drug Use in Chinese Elderly （2017 version） （hereinafter referred to as the “Chinese PIM standard”）， the PIM status of elderly cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify influential factors for PIM. RESULTS A total of 293 patients were included in the study. According to the 2019 version of Beers standard， 211 patients （72.01%） had PIM， of which 204 （69.62%） had PIM related to drugs， 6 （2.05%） had PIM related to diseases or symptoms， 46 （15.70%） had PIM that should be used with caution， 32 （10.92%） had PIM with drug-drug interaction that should be avoided， and 11 （3.75%） had PIM based on renal function； the top 5 drugs in the list of incidence were proton pump inhibitors， metoclopramide， the first-generation antihistamines as promethazine， analgesics as ibuprofen and megestrol. According to the Chinese PIM standard， there were 132 patients （45.05%） with PIM， of which 119 （40.61%） had PIM related to drugs， involving 25 drugs （included 7 high-risk drugs and 18 low-risk drugs）， and 24 （8.19%） with PIM in disease status； top 4 drugs in the list of incidence were promethazine， megestrol， ibuprofen and cimetidine. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that compared with patients with hospital stay≤10 days， patients with hospital 20054） stay between 11 and 30 days had a higher risk of PIM [odds ratio （OR）＝8.836 8， 95% confidence interval （CI） （3.217 8， 31.940 9）， P＝0.000 1]； compared with the patients with the 65895198。E-mail：fjman@cmpt.ac.cn number of clinical disease diagnosed≤5， patients with the number of clinical disease diagnosed≥11 had a higher risk of PIM [OR＝10.930 1， 95%CI （3.000 9， 70.922 9）， P＝0.001 8]； compared with surgical treatment， patients receiving antineoplastic drugs had a higher risk of PIM [OR＝2.209 5， 95%CI （1.180 2， 4.176 9）， P＝0.013 6]. CONCLUSIONS Elderly cancer patients have multiple diseases， complicated medication， and a high incidence of PIM. The length of hospital stay （11-30 d）， the number of clinical disease diagnosed （≥11） and anti-tumor drugs are main influential factors for PIM in patients.

Assessment and comparison of anticholinergic exposure in older adults at a Basic Health Unit in Porto Alegre / Avaliação e comparação da exposição anticolinérgica em idosos de uma Unidade Básica de Saúde de Porto Alegre

Objectives: To estimate the anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients using two scales and to assess the degree of agreement between them. Methods: Data from an observational study conducted in a primary health care service were used. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Belgian Scale Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale and the Brazilian Scale of Medicines with Anticholinergic Activity. The cumulative anticholinergic burden score was classified using a categorical approach: Brazilian scale (0: none; 1 ­ 2: low; ≥ 3: high) and Belgian scale (0: none; 0.5 ­ 1.5: low; ≥ 2: high). The degree of agreement between the two instruments was obtained through Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: A total of 374 older people were included, most of them female and aged between 60 and 69 years. At least one potentially inappropriate drug with anticholinergic activity was used by 60.70% of patients according to the Brazilian scale and 32.89% by the Belgian scale. On average, 20.85% were under high anticholinergic exposure. Overall, on both scales, the most commonly recurrent medications were those indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Agreement between the scales was moderate (Kappa = 0.43). Conclusions: A high percentage of older adults was exposed to drugs with an anticholinergic burden, posing risks to health and quality of life. Consensus is needed on how anticholinergic burden is calculated by these scores, as well as standardization of the list of included drugs.

Objetivos: Estimar a carga anticolinérgica em idosos com base em duas escalas e avaliar o grau de concordância entre estas. Metodologia: Foram utilizados dados de um estudo observacional realizado em um serviço de atenção primária. A carga anticolinérgica foi avaliada pela escala belga Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale e da Escala Brasileira de Medicamentos com Atividade Anticolinérgica. A pontuação da carga anticolinérgica cumulativa foi classificada utilizando uma abordagem categórica: escala brasileira (0: nenhuma, 1 ­ 2: baixa, ≥ 3: alta) e escala belga (0: nenhuma, 0,5 ­ 1,5: baixa, ≥ 2: alta). O grau de concordância entre as duas ferramentas foi obtido por meio do coeficiente Capa de Cohen. Resultados: Foram incluídos 374 idosos, a maioria do sexo feminino e com idade entre 60 a 69 anos. O uso de pelo menos um medicamento potencialmente inapropriado com atividade anticolinérgica foi verificado em 60,70% dos idosos com a aplicação da escala brasileira e em 32,89% com a escala belga. Em média, 20.85% estavam sob alta exposição anticolinérgica. De modo geral, os medicamentos mais recorrentes, para ambas as escalas, foram os indicados para o tratamento de transtornos psiquiátricos. A concordância entre as escalas foi moderada (Capa = 0,43). Conclusão: Um percentual elevado de idosos estava exposto a medicamentos com carga anticolinérgica, representando riscos para a saúde e a qualidade de vida. É necessário um consenso sobre como calcular a carga anticolinérgica nos diferentes escores, bem como a padronização da lista de medicamentos incluídos.

Medication package inserts do not present adequate information on potential risks for older adults in Brazil / Bulas de medicamentos não apresentam informações adequadas sobre potenciais riscos para idosos no Brasil

OBJECTIVE: To compare information on the risks of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults in the Beers criteria with data in the package inserts made available by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. METHODS: This is an observational, cross-sectional study that compared information on the package inserts of 33 brand-name drugs in the Brazilian market with specific recommendations for older adults contemplated in the Beers criteria, categorizing them into: complete, incomplete, absent, or discrepant. RESULTS: Among the analyzed package inserts, 21.21% did not present a specific section dedicated to the use of these drugs by older adults and data were scattered throughout the text; 63.64% were classified as incomplete; 33.33% lacked data; and 3.03% had discrepant information. CONCLUSION: The analyzed package inserts presented incomplete data or lacked information characterizing the drugs as PIMs for older adults. This study demonstrated that some package inserts of drugs used in Brazil are not satisfactory, warranting higher caution in the medical community when prescribing these medications and guiding patients

OBJETIVO: Comparar as informações sobre os riscos de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPIs) para idosos contidas nos critérios Beers com as informações presentes nas bulas para profissionais de saúde disponibilizadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária no Brasil. METODOLOGIA: Estudo observacional e transversal que comparou informações das bulas para profissionais de saúde de 33 medicamentos de referência no mercado brasileiro com recomendações específicas para idosos contempladas nos critérios Beers e que foram categorizadas em: completas, incompletas, ausentes ou discrepantes. RESULTADOS: Dentre as bulas dos MPIs analisadas, 21,21% não apresentam seção específica destinada ao uso desses medicamentos por idosos, nas quais as informações estão dispersas pelo texto; 63,64% delas foram classificadas como incompletas; 33,33% tinham informações ausentes; e 3,03% com informações discrepantes. CONCLUSÃO: As bulas analisadas apresentaram dados incompletos ou não apresentam qualquer informação que caracterizasse o medicamento como MPI para idosos. Este estudo demonstra que algumas bulas de medicamentos utilizados no Brasil não estão satisfatórias, sugerindo maior cautela à comunidade médica na prescrição e na orientação aos seus pacientes

Sobrevida de pessoas idosas hospitalizadas com uso prévio de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados / Survival of hospitalized older adults with prior use of potentially inappropriate medicine

Resumo Objetivos Neste estudo prospectivo, avaliamos o impacto do uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados prescritos antes da internação (PIM-ph) na mortalidade de idosos. Métodos Foram incluídos 318 pacientes com idade ≥ 65 anos que procuraram atendimento de emergência e foram internados por qualquer motivo clínico. As informações sobre os indicadores clínicos e sociais foram obtidas por meio de entrevistas estruturadas, 24 a 48 horas após a internação. Os medicamentos usados por esses pacientes foram registrados e o uso de PIM-ph foi identificado pela análise brasileira baseada em consenso de uso de PIM. A análise considerou a influência de todo conjunto de PIM-ph, bem como de alguns PIM-ph específicos. O impacto do uso de PIM-ph na sobrevida de idosos hospitalizados foi determinado por meio da análise multivariada de regressão de Cox. Resultados A prevalência de PIM-ph foi 49,7% (n = 158). Um total de 85 (26,7%) pacientes faleceram durante a internação ou até 30 dias após a alta. Dezoito classes farmacológicas de uso de PIM-ph foram identificadas. O uso de PIM-ph, benzodiazepínico (IC: 1.055-3.365, p= 0.032), digoxina (IC: 1.623-7.048, p=0.001) e diuréticos de alça (IC: 1.000-3.455, p=0.05) aumentou o risco relativo de mortalidade independente de sexo, idade, causas clínicas de hospitalização, risco de fragilidade, suporte social, presença de sintomas de confusão, polifarmácia e evolução intra-hospitalar de complicações geriátricas. Conclusão O uso de PIM-ph (Benzodiazepínicos, digoxina e diuréticos de alça) pode contribuir para o risco de mortalidade em idosos hospitalizados. Esses resultados podem ser relevantes no manejo e cuidado terapêutico de pacientes hospitalizados.

Abstract Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of potentially inappropriate medications prescribed prior to hospitalization (PIM-ph) on the mortality Methods We included 318 patients, aged ≥65 who sought emergency care and were hospitalized for any clinical reasons. Information on patients' clinical and social indicators was obtained via structured interviews conducted 24 to 48 hours after hospitalization. All medications used by older adults prior to hospitalization were recorded, and PIM-ph were identified using the Brazilian PIM Consensus. The study considered the influence of the entire set of PIM-ph and specific PIM-ph used by these patients. The impact of PIM-ph use during hospitalization and after 30 days of this event was statistically determined by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, which included sex, age, and other clinical and functional indicators as intervening variables. Results The prevalence of PIM-ph use was 49.7% (n=158). A total of 85 (26.7%) patients died during hospitalization or within 30 days after discharge. Eighteen pharmacological classes of PIM-ph use were identified. The use of total PIM-ph, benzodiazepines (IC: 1.055-3.365, p= 0.032), digoxin(IC: 1.623-7.048, p=0.001), and loop diuretics (IC: 1.000-3.455, p=0.05) increased the relative risk of mortality independent of sex, age, clinical causes of hospitalization, frailty risk, social support, presence of confusion symptoms, polypharmacy, and in-hospital evolution of geriatric complications. Conclusion PIM-ph use, especially benzodiazepines, digoxin, and loop diuretics, could contribute to mortality risk in hospitalized older adults. These results could be relevant in the management and therapeutic care of hospitalized patients.

Polifarmacia y prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en adultos mayores hospitalizados

Introducción: las prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en ancianos es un hecho común, tanto en el ámbito comunitario como hospitalario, dada su frecuencia elevada de comorbilidad grave y polifarmacia, y conlleva importantes repercusiones clínicas y económicas. Objetivo: determinar la prevalencia de polifarmacia y de prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en adultos mayores. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico transversal, de series de casos, en adultos mayores hospitalizados en el hogar de ancianos "Lidia Doce Sánchez" de Bayamo entre 1ro de septiembre de 2018 al 1ro de septiembre de 2019. La información se obtuvo del análisis de las historias clínicas y la aplicación de los criterios de STOPP/START. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva, se utilizaron pruebas de contrastación de hipótesis y se determinó la razón de prevalencia para determinar los factores asociados. Resultados: fueron frecuentes los pacientes con edades iguales o superiores a 75 años; del sexo masculino; con grado de instrucción primaria; con estado civil soltero y desnutrido. El promedio de comorbilidades por paciente fue de 4,2 ± 2,5; encontrándose como las principales afecciones las enfermedades cardiovasculares. La polifarmacia fue frecuente. La relación de riesgo frente a las potenciales prescripciones inadecuadas de medicamentos es con la edad avanzada, nivel de instrucción baja, comorbilidad, malnutrición y polimedicación. Las potenciales omisiones en la prescripción relacionan con la edad avanzada. Las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas aumentan su probabilidad de presentación con edad avanzada, un nivel bajo de instrucción, la desnutrición, la comorbilidad y la polimedicación. Conclusiones: se constató elevada polifarmacia y prescripción de medicamentos potencialmente no apropiados en los adultos mayores.

Introduction: potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly is a common occurrence, both in the community and hospital settings, given its high frequency of severe comorbidity and polypharmacy, and has significant clinical and economic repercussions. Objective: to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications in older adults. Methods: a cross-sectional analytical study of case series was carried out in older adults hospitalized in the "Lidia Doce Sánchez" nursing home in Bayamo between September 1, 2018 and September 1, 2019. The information was obtained from the analysis of clinical records and the application of the STOPP/START criteria. The analysis of the data was carried out through descriptive statistics, hypothesis contrast tests were used and the prevalence ratio was determined to determine the associated factors. Results: patients with ages equal to or greater than 75 years were frequent; of the male sex; with a primary education degree; with single marital status and malnourished. The average number of comorbidities per patient was 4.2 ± 2.5; being found as the main affections cardiovascular diseases. Polypharmacy was frequent. The risk relationship against potential inappropriate drug prescriptions is with advanced age, low level of education, comorbidity, malnutrition and polypharmacy. The potential omissions in the prescription are related to advanced age. Potential drug interactions increase the probability of presentation with advanced age, low level of education, malnutrition, comorbidity and polypharmacy. Conclusions: high polypharmacy and prescription of potentially inappropriate medications were found in older adults.

Introdução: prescrições potencialmente inadequadas em idosos é uma ocorrência comum, tanto na comunidade quanto no hospital, dada a sua alta frequência de comorbidades graves e polifarmácia, e acarreta importantes repercussões clínicas e econômicas. Objetivo: determinar a prevalência de polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados em idosos. Métodos: foi realizado um estudo transversal analítico de série de casos em idosos hospitalizados no lar de idosos "Lidia Doce Sánchez", em Bayamo, entre 1º de setembro de 2018 e 1º de setembro de 2019. As informações foram obtidas a partir da análise dos prontuários e da aplicação dos critérios STOPP/START. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatística descritiva, teste de hipóteses e razão de prevalência foi determinada para determinar os fatores associados. Resultados: pacientes com 75 anos ou mais foram frequentes; macho; com o ensino fundamental; com estado civil solteiro e desnutrido. O número médio de comorbidades por paciente foi de 4,2 ± 2,5; sendo encontradas como principais afecções as doenças cardiovasculares. A polifarmácia era frequente. A razão de risco para potenciais prescrições inadequadas de medicamentos é com idade avançada, baixa escolaridade, comorbidade, desnutrição e polimedicação. As possíveis omissões na prescrição referem-se à idade avançada. Potenciais interações medicamentosas aumentam sua probabilidade de se apresentar com idade avançada, baixo nível de escolaridade, desnutrição, comorbidade e polimedicação. Conclusões: alta polifarmácia e prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados foram encontrados em idosos.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older patients and associated factors: comparison of two versions of STOPP/START criteria

Abstract The study aimed to estimate and compare the prevalence and type of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) between the STOPP/START original (v1) and updated version (v2) among older patients in various settings, as well as associated factors. The study included 440 patients attending a community pharmacy, 200 outpatients and 140 nursing home users. An increase in the prevalence of STOPP v2 (57.9%) compared to v1 (56.2%) was not statistically significant in the total sample and within each setting (p>0.05). A decrease in the prevalence of START v1 (55.8%) to v2 (41.2%) was statistically significant (p<0.001) in the total sample and within each setting (p<0.05). Drug indication (32.9%) and fall-risk medications (32.2%) were most commonly identified for STOPP v2, while cardiovascular system criteria (30.5%) were the most frequently detected for START v2. The number of medications was the strongest predictor for both STOPP v1 and v2, with odds ratio values of 1.35 and 1.34, respectively. Patients' characteristics associated with the occurrence of STOPP and START criteria were identified. According to both STOPP/START versions, the results indicate a substantial rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing among elderly patients. The prevalence of PIMs was slightly higher with the updated version, while the prevalence of PPOs was significantly lower

Prevalence of Drug Interactions and Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Geriatric Patients in India.

Aim: The study aimed to determine the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among geriatrics. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for six months in the Department of Geriatrics, M.S. Ramaiah Teaching Hospital, Bangalore. PDDIs and PIMS were analyzed using micromedex database and Beer's criteria respectively. Results: Among 395 prescriptions, 221(56%) prescriptions showed 559 pDDIs and 41(10.4%) PIMs. Almost 281(50.3%), 260(46.5%), 16(2.7%) and 2(0.3%) pDDIs were categorised as major, moderate, minor and contraindicated respectively. Almost 321(57.5%) were synergistic and 196(35.0%) were antagonistic drug interactions. Pearson correlation value (R) is 0.9957 which showed a strong positive correlation. Conclusion: This study created awareness on drug interactions among geriatrics and help the practitioners to prescribe drugs with a low risk of pDDIs. The authors suggest PIM monitoring in geriatrics to avoid adverse effects and improve patients' quality of life.

Assessment of appropriateness of prescribing among Indian geriatric outpatients using STOPP and START Criteria Version 2 at a tertiary care teaching hospital

Background: Inappropriate prescribing is more prevalent in geriatric patients. A popular tool for screening appropriateness of prescribing is the screening tool of older person’s prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment (START) criteria. In this study, our aim was to estimate the incidence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) utilizing these criteria among patients attending outpatient departments. In addition, we aimed to identify potential factors that are associated with PIP. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of the study are as follows: (1) To estimate incidence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using STOPP criteria; (2) To estimate incidence of potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using START criteria; and (3) To identify potential factors that are associated with PIP. Materials and Methods: A prospective and cross-sectional study that was observational in nature was performed in patients with age 65 years and above. Prescriptions of these patients were analyzed by collecting relevant data that were subsequently entered in specially designed case record forms. The modified version 2.0 of STOPP/START criteria was utilized to assess PIP in the form of PIMs and PPOs. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel 2013 and analyzed. Categorical variables were described as frequency and percentage whereas continuous variables were described as mean with standard deviation. Results: Prescriptions of a total 306 patients were evaluated (mean age: 69.4, 60% male, average number of medications per prescription: 5.04 ± 2.44), PIMs were detected in 88 (28.75%) and PPOs in 30 (9.8%) patients. Ninety-six patients had either a PIM or a PPO. PIMs mainly involved were duplication of drug class (26.5%), use of first generation antihistaminic for >1 week (20.4%) and use of glimepiride (18.6%). Major PPOs identified were non-use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors following acute myocardial infarction (26%), non-use of statin therapy (26%), and antiplatelet therapy (21.7%) in patients with diabetes mellitus along with cardiovascular risk factor. Polypharmacy (OR 6.011, P < 0.0001) and comorbidity (OR 3.097, P = 0.015) significantly increase the risk of PIM encounter. Conclusion: PIP in the form of PIMs and PPOs was prevalent in the studied patients. Polypharmacy and comorbidity were associated with an increased likelihood of PIM.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized elderly patients

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescription in hospitalized elderly patients according to the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. METHODS: This study is a prospective analysis of electronic medical records of elderly patients admitted to the Department of Medicine, Hospital Central da Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, between 1 September 2020 and 30 April 2021. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (85 women and 57 men) with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years (65-99 years) were assessed. Of these, 108 (76.1%) were elderly (age ≥65 years and <80 years) and 34 (23.9%) long-lived (age ≥80 years). The average length of stay found in the sample was 25.3±28.7 days (between 2 and 235 days), and 102 out of the 140 patients assessed remained in the hospital for up to 29 days. Sixteen drugs considered potentially inappropriate medication were found in the patients' prescriptions, with at least one potentially inappropriate medication having been prescribed to 141 (99.3%) patients. Elderly patients had a mean of 2.57±0.94 potentially inappropriate medication prescribed versus 2.56±0.89 among long-lived patients. The most prescribed potentially inappropriate medication were as follows: regular human insulin as required (85.2%), and omeprazole (73.9%) and metoclopramide as required (61.3%). CONCLUSION: The study sample showed significant percentages of potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions for the elderly admitted to the hospital.

Declínio cognitivo e uso de medicamentos na população de idosos institucionalizados de uma cidade do interior de Minas Gerais, Brasil / Neurocognitive disorders and medication used by the institutionalized elderly population of the interior of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Resumo Introdução Idosos institucionalizados possuem maiores riscos para a prescrição de cinco ou mais medicamentos, ou polifarmácia, e, por consequência, de eventos adversos, por apresentarem problemas de saúde limitantes, fragilidade e baixa funcionalidade. Esse risco é ainda maior quanto maior o declínio cognitivo. Objetivo Determinar a prevalência de declínio cognitivo (DC) e a relação com o uso de medicamentos em idosos institucionalizados. Método Estudo transversal descritivo realizado por análise de prontuários dos idosos institucionalizados portadores ou não de DC, conforme resultados de testes validados. Foram levantados os medicamentos utilizados e os medicamentos potencialmente inadequados (MPI) por meio dos Critérios de Beers (2015). Resultados Foram avaliados 88 idosos, com idade média de 77,6 (9,2) anos. A prevalência de DC foi de 75%, sendo maior no sexo feminino (82,5%, p = 0,01) e em idosos acima de 80 anos (85%, p = 0,04). Antieméticos e inibidores de bomba de prótons foram significativamente mais utilizados nos idosos com DC. A prevalência de polifarmácia foi de 69,3%, e 71 idosos (80,68%) utilizavam pelo menos um MPI, com maior prevalência do uso de MPI na faixa etária de 60 a 79 anos (p = 0,004). Os idosos que utilizavam pelo menos um MPI também usavam maior número de medicamentos (p = 0,014). Conclusão A presença de DC teve relação com a maior utilização de antieméticos e inibidores de bomba de prótons, mas não com o maior uso de MPI. Além disso, foi observada elevada prevalência de polifarmácia e MPI em prescrições dos idosos institucionalizados.

Abstract Background Institutionalized elderly are at greater risk of prescribing five or more medications and consequently of higher occurence of adverse events, as they have limiting health problems, frailty and low functionality. This risk is even greater if they also have cognitive decline. Objective To determine the prevalence of cognitive disorders (CDs) and its association with the medication used by the institutionalized elderly population of the interior of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Method Descriptive cross-sectional study for analysis of medical records of institutionalized elderly with or without CDs, according to validated tests. The medicine used and the potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were determined as per the Beers criteria (2015). Results Eighty eight elderly people, with mean age of 77.6 (9.2) years, were included. CD prevalence was 75% higher in females (82.5%, p = 0.01) and in older age groups, with 80 years and above (85%, p = 0.04). Antiemetics and proton pump inhibitors were significantly more used by the elderly with CDs. The prevalence of polypharmacy was 69.3%, 71 elderlies (80.7%) used at least one PIM, and a higher prevalence of PIM use was observed in elderly people of 60 to 79 years old (p = 0.004). The elderly who used at least one PIM was also observed to use a higher number of medications (p = 0.014). Conclusion CDs was found to be related to the higher use of antiemetics and proton pump inhibitors, but not to the use of PIMs in regards to the institutionalized elderlies. Furthermore, a high prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs were detected in the prescriptions of the institutionalized elderly subjects.

Comparison of commonly used judgment criteria for potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To compare five com monly used judgment criteria for potentially inappropriate medication （PIM）in the elderly ，and to provide reference for clinical selection of appropriate PIM evaluation tools for the elderly. METHODS From the aspects of applicable age ，content and scale characteristics ，five commonly used PIM judgment criteria for the elderly at home and abroad were analyzed and compared ，namely Beer ’s criteria ，STOPP/START v 2 criteria，ACOVE 3 criteria，PIM-Check criteria and“Judgment Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication for Chinese Elderly ”（Chinese criteria ）. RESULTS The five standards both overlapped and focused in terms of scale characteristics. In each study ，the incidence of PIM was different according to different standards. Proton pump inhibitors ，diuretics，non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants were the most frequently occurring PIM drugs for the elderly. CONCLUSIONS Combining with the specific conditions of patients and fully considering the benefits and risks of treatment ，rational selection and combination of five PIM judgment criteria ，and necessary supplements to my country ’s PIM judgment criteria ，will help clinicians and pharmacists to improve the efficacy and safety of the medication in the elderly patients.

Potential inappropriate medication and its influencing factors among elderly hypertensive patients in community general practice clinic / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective:To investigate the status quo of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) among elderly hypertensive patients in community general practice clinic and related influencing factors.Methods:A total of 767 prescriptions for elderly hypertensive patients in a community health service center in Beijing from October 2020 to August 2021 were reviewed. The prevalence of PIM was assessed based on the criteria of potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in China(2017). Logistic regression analysis was employed to analyze the influencing factors for PIM. Results:The survey showed that 198 elderly patients had PIM with 244 person-doses. The top three drugs with high rate of PIM were benzodiazepine-estazolam (64 person-doses), clopidogrel (53 person-doses) and insulin (35 person-doses). Univariate analysis showed that PIM was significantly associated with types of medication;and underlying diseases hypertension with hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, upper respiratory tract infection and insomnia (χ 2=82.58, 13.65, 17.74, 7.52, 10.34, 68.19,respectively,all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the types of medication, hypertension complicated with upper respiratory tract infection, and insomnia were independent influencing factors for PIM ( OR=1.55, 2.47, 9.05; P<0.05). Conclusion:The study shows that PIM is more common in elderly hypertensive patients in community general practice clinics,which is associated with types of medication, hypertension complicated with upper respiratory tract infection and insomnia. It is suggested that general practitioner working in community clinics should be aware of PIM, minimize the number of prescription drugs, and choose new drugs or non-drug treatments to reduce the occurrence of PIM.

Effect of potentially inappropriate medication on frailty among community-dwelling elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment: a propensity score-matched analysis / 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

Objective:To explore the effect of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) on frailty among community-dwelling elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Methods:From March to July 2021, a total of 252 elderly patients with MCI in Hefei community were selected.The data of basic information and PIM of subjects were collected.All subjects were assessed by the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument (CFAI), Montreal cognitive assessment scale-basic (MoCA-B), and the Barthel index (BI). The subjects were divided into PIM group ( n=136) and non-PIM group ( n=94) according to whether there was PIM.Taking the confounding factors as the matching condition, the subjects of the two groups were matched with 1∶1 propensity score.After matching, there were 52 in the PIM group and 52 in the non-PIM group.SPSS 23.0 was used for data analysis.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effect of PIM on frailty of subjects. Results:(1)Before matching, the incidence of frailty in PIM group and non-PIM group were 80.9% and 19.1%, respectively, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PIM was a risk factor for the frailty ( β=1.704, OR=5.495, 95% CI=2.539-11.892). (2)After matching, the confounders of age, hearing status, chewing function, activities of daily living, Charlson comorbidity index, handgrip strength, and cognitive function were balanced and comparable between the two groups.The incidence of frailty in PIM group and non-PIM group were 67.9% and 32.1%, respectively.The differences remained statistically significant ( P<0.01). PIM remained a risk factor for frailty ( β=1.791, OR=5.998, 95% CI=2.393-15.032). Conclusion:PIM is a risk factor for the occurrence of frailty in elderly patients with MCI.Therefore, the accurate screening and standardized management of PIM will provide a new target for the frailty management of elderly patients with MCI.

Medication Appropriateness among Older Persons Admitted to a General Hospital in Malaysia

@#Introduction: Many tools have been developed to determine medication appropriateness in older persons including the 2015 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria and the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. We aimed to determine and compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) based on the Beers criteria 2015 and the STOPP criteria v2 among older persons admitted to a general hospital in Malaysia. Methods: A cross-sectional study comprising of 160 patients aged 65 years old and above admitted to the general medical wards of a tertiary teaching hospital were recruited. Beers criteria 2015 and the STOPP criteria v2 were used to evaluate participants’ medication list on admission, during hospitalisation and on discharge for PIMs. Prevalence of PIMs which was calculated as the total number of patients with one or more PIMs over the total number of patients. Results: The prevalence of PIMs identified by Beers criteria 2015 on admission, during hospitalisation and on discharge were 54.85%, 64.40% and 48.80% respectively. The prevalence of PIM based on STOPP criteria v2 were 33.08%, 47.50% and 42.50% respectively. The most prevalent PIMs according to Beers criteria 2015 and STOPP criteria v2 were diuretics, tramadol, ticlopidine, proton pump inhibitor, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. Conclusion: The prevalence of PIMs use is high among hospitalised older persons in Malaysia. While it is not possible to avoid all PIMs listed in the Beers and STOPP criteria, clinicians should exercise caution in prescribing drugs such as benzodiazepines, antipsychotics and proton pump inhibitors for older persons weighing the risk versus benefit of the drugs.