ABSTRACT
Resumo As duas primeiras décadas do século XXI foram representativas para a história contemporânea da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz e demonstraram seu protagonismo no cenário nacional da saúde. O artigo apresenta transformações espaciais ocorridas no território ocupado pela instituição a partir de 2000. Relacionam-se as transformações no uso dos territórios com sua política institucional no contexto nacional e são ressaltadas as demandas sociais que impactaram a instituição - transformações urbanas de grande porte e pandemias. O trabalho averigua, sob os pressupostos da história do tempo presente, as mudanças ocorridas no campus Manguinhos-Maré e no discurso de sujeitos institucionais gestores e projetistas. Para isso, conjuga análise dos relatórios institucionais, da base digital cartográfica e de imagens aéreas.
Abstract The two first decades of the twenty-first century were representative of the contemporary history of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz) and demonstrated its active role in the national health scenario. This article discusses the spatial transformations that took place in the territory occupied by the foundation from the year 2000 onward. The transformations in the use of this territory and it's institutional policy within the national context are described, along with the social demands that have impacted the institution, namely large-scale urban transformations and pandemics. This research uses the premises of the history of the present to investigate the changes that took place on the Manguinhos-Maré campus and in the discourse of the institutions involved in managing and planning these changes through analysis of institutional reports, digital mapping, and aerial images.
Subject(s)
Research , Public Health , Organizational Policy , Academies and Institutes , Brazil , History, 21st CenturyABSTRACT
La pregunta que convoca este escrito surge a partir de la gran incidencia de casos que se presentan, en la práctica institucional, de pacientes que no se encuentran dentro de lo esperable con respecto a la adquisición del lenguaje y a todo lo que implica el armado del aparataje simbólico. Esto es: la posibilidad de la constitución de un yo-cuerpo libidinal como una unidad diferenciada del otro (Freud, 1923, p.27), y el ordenamiento pulsional consecuente en el sentido de un armado del mundo habitable para el sujeto, todo lo cual implica la construcción de la subjetividad. Se trata de casos en donde no se construyó la posibilidad de una cierta autonomía en el niño: el certificado de discapacidad denota esto. En este estado de cosas se requiere de una dependencia permanente del otro, muchas veces el Estado, a través de las instituciones estatales o privadas. Todo esto nos lleva a pensar, a modo de hipótesis, en la incidencia de las variables de la época actual en lo que ubicamos como una precarización en la construcción de la subjetividad en los casos descriptos.
The question that summons this paper arises from the great incidence of cases that are presented, in the institutional practice, of patients that are not within the expectable regarding the acquisition of the language and all that implies the building of the symbolic apparatus. This is: the possibility of the constitution of a libidinal self-body as a differentiated unit from the other (Freud, 1923, p.27), and the consequent instinental ordering in the sense the disposition of an habitable world for the subject, all of which involves the construction of subjectivity. These are cases where the possibility of a certain autonomy in the child was not built: the certificate of disability denotes this. In this state of things, the patient requires a permanent dependence on the other, often the State, through state or private institutions. All this leads us to think, as a hypothesis, in the incidence of the variables of the present time on what we place as a precarization in the construction of subjectivity in the cases described.