ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) for internal hemorrhoids.Methods:This study was a prospective double-blind controlled clinical one. A total of 80 patients with internal hemorrhoids who visited Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 and met the inclusion and did not meet exclusion criteria, were randomly divided into CAES group ( n=40) and PPH group ( n=40) by random number table method, and received corresponding treatment respectively. The perioperative indices of the two groups were compared, including intraoperative blood loss, operation time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 24 and 48 hours after operation, length of hospital stay, treatment costs, time to return to normal life, and curative rates. The complications within 3 months after operation and the 1-year recurrence after operation were also compared between the two groups. Results:The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The intraoperative blood loss (0.54±0.15 mL VS 7.32±2.17 mL) and treatment cost (6 249.53±435.67 yuan VS 7 832.96±526.74 yuan) in CAES group were significantly lower than those in PPH group ( t=19.714, P<0.05; t=14.650, P<0.05). The length of hospital stay (3.53±0.94 d VS 5.18±1.36 d) and time to return to normal life (5.26±1.28 d VS 7.17±2.09 d) in CAES group were significantly lower than those in PPH group ( t=6.312, P<0.05; t=4.929, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( t=0.977, P>0.05). The VAS scores at 24 h (2.64±0.70 points VS 3.59±0.93 points) and 48 h (1.28±0.31 points VS 2.16±0.57 points) after operation in CAES group were significantly lower than those in PPH group ( t=5.162, P<0.05; t=8.578, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the curative rate [90.0% (36/40) VS 97.5% (39/40)] between CAES group and PPH group ( χ2=0.853, P=0.356). During the follow-up period within 3 months after the operation, the incidence of urinary retention [0.0% (0/40) VS 15.0% (6/40)] and pain [2.5% (1/40) VS 22.5% (9/40)] in CAES group was significantly lower than those in PPH group ( χ2=4.504, P<0.05; χ2=7.314, P<0.05). No other complications occurred in the 80 patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the recurrence rate of CAES group was 7.5% (3/40), which was not statistically different from that in PPH group [5.0% (2/40), χ2=0.180, P>0.05]. Conclusion:As a new minimally invasive technique for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids, CAES has similar curative rate and 1-year recurrence rate to PPH. Compared with PPH, CAES shows the advantages of less trauma, less pain, faster recovery and lower cost.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the efficacy and safety of two procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoid: the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR).@*Methods@#A retrospective cohort research was conducted. Clinical data of 263 patients undergoing the first elective surgery for grade IV hemorrhoids by the same team of surgeons at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, while those had other anorectal diseases, emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor and incomplete clinical data were excluded. PPH was performed in 129 patients and STARR was performed in 134 patients. PPH procedure: a circular purse 2-0 string suture was made at 4 cm above the dentate line; in accordance with the standard protocol, the PPH circular stapling devicewas introduced; the suture was closed, and a pull-through followed; the traction was continued; the stapler was fired; the prolapsed mucosa and submucosa were removed. STARR procedure: 3-5 needles were sutured in the anterior rectal mucosa, protecting the posterior wall mucosa; with the help of a finger the PPH stapler was inserted into the vaginal lumen; the sutures were hooked from both sides of the stapler to maintain traction; according to the disease condition, the suturewas tightened appropriately; stapler was screwed and activated; the anterior wall mucosa was removed; the joint of the both ends of anastomosis was cut; the posterior wall mucosa was removed as well. The short-term efficacy, surgical safety and prognosis of the two groups were compared.@*Results@#There were 67 males (51.9%) in the PPH group and 57 (42.5%) males in the STARR group. The median age of the two groups was 51.0 (22.0, 80.0) years and 49.0 (24.0, 74.0) years, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic drug use, postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection, etc. were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to PPH group, STAAR group had longer operation time and higher hospitalization cost with significant differences [(44.0±19.3) minutes vs. (26.3±8.5) minutes, t=9.701, P=0.001; (11 047±473) yuan vs. (7674±309) yuan, t=32.826, P=0.001]. One case in STAAR group developed rectovaginal fistula. The median follow-up period of the whole group was 40 (33, 52) months. A total of 108 cases in STARR group and 114 cases in PPH group completed the follow-up. The 3-year disease-relapse rate was 0 in STARR group and 4.2% in PPH group (P=0.042).@*Conclusion@#STARR procedure can improve the prognosis in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid, but attention should be paid to the development of complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) based on pelvic anatomy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse.Methods From Mar 2009 to Sep 2011.37 patients (group A) received taparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair based on pelvic anatomy,and group B (n =41) received laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with PPH.Constipation level,degree of internal prolapse,relapse and postoperative complications were assessed in 5 years after operation.Results 5 years after operation,the relief of constipation and the improvement of internal prolapse in group B were better than in group A [(-0.4 ± 0.9) cm vs.(-1.0 ± 1.1) cm,t =2.370,P =0.020].The recurrence rate in group B was statistically lower than that in group A (10％ vs.30％,x2 =4.995,P =0.025).Grade Ⅰ to Grade Ⅲ complications between the two groups was not statistically different (11％ vs.12％,x2 =0.037,P =0.848).Conclusions The effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with PPH based on pelvic anatomy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse was superior to laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy of perioperative management in elderly hemorrhoids patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH).Methods A total of 128 elderly patients treated with PPH in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from February 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into the routine group(n=64)and the intervention group(n=64).The routine group underwent routine postoperative management,and the intervention group received intervention postoperative management as add-on to routine postoperative management.Clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups.Results The frequency of constipation and hematoehezia was less and the hospitalization days were shorter in the intervention group than in the routine group(0.8 ± 0.6 times/d vs.1.2 ± 0.4 times/d,1.3 ± 0.8 times/d vs.2.0± 1.0 times/d,4.9± 1.1 days vs.7.4± 1.3 days,t =4.438,4.372 and 11.744 respectively,all P =0.000).The scores of visual analog scale(VAS) and geriatric depression scale (GDS) had no significant difference between the intervention and routine groups (5.0 ± 1.6 scores vs.5.2 ± 1.3 scores for VAS;22.2± 2.9 scores vs.22.5 ± 2.6 scores for GDS,t =0.776 and 0.616,P =0.220 and 0.269)before intervention,and had significant difference between the intervention and routine groups[2.7 ± 0.7 scores vs.3.2 ± 1.1 scores for VAS;17.2 ± 1.8 scores vs.19.0 ± 2.2 scores for GDS(t =3.068 and 5.066,P=0.001 and 0.000)]after intervention.The scores of quality of life,including physiological function,emotional function,social function,mental health and health status,were higher in the intervention group than in the routine group (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Intervention perioperative management is effective in elderly hemorrhoids patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,It can not only effectively improve clinical symptoms and shorten treatment time,but also alleviate pain and improve prognosis and quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Objective To research the clinical effect of audiovisual dispersion combined with atropine for preventing blood vessel vagus reflex (VVR) in the patients with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH).Methods One hundred and twenty six patients undergoing PPH in this hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were numbered according to the order of admission and then divided into 2 groups according to parity number.The two groups were intraoperative given atropine to prevent VVR,the observation group additionally conducted the audiovisual dispersion intervention.The prevention effects were compared between the two groups.Results There was 1 case (1.59％) of VVR in the observation group,which was lower than 7 cases (11.11％) in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR) level and anxiety score had no statistically significant difference between the two groups before entering the operating room (T1)(P＞0.05).The levels of MAP and HR at the time PPH was fired in the control group were decreased compared with those at T1 (P＜0.05),the decrease was more obvious compared with the observation group (P＜0.05);the score of anxiety in the observation group was decreased compared with that at T1 (P＜0.05),and was lower than that of control group (P＜ 0.05).The MAP,HR level and anxiety score at 30 min after surgery had no statistical difference between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion Implementing the audiovisual dispersion intervention is beneficial to the intraoperative emotional stability in the patients with PPH and reduces the occurrence of VVR.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical effect of thrombus removal of external hemorrhoid combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) in the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoid with incarceration.Methods A total of 118 cases of circumferential mixed hemorrhoid with incarceration were divided into two groups:experimental group of 60 cases was treated by thrombus removal combined with PPH;control group of 58 cases was treated by Milligan-Morgan.We observed the differences of postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS)score,edema,bleeding,residual skin tag,wound healing time,anal stenosis,fecal incontinence,anorectal manometry and satisfaction in the two groups.Results There was significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in postoperative edema,bleeding and residual skin tag(χ2=6.63,4.19,6.64,P0.05).Postoperative VAS score,wound healing time,satisfaction,anal resting and anal maximal squeeze pressure between the two groups were all statistically different(P<0.01).Conclusion The operation of thrombus removal of external hemorrhoid combined with PPH can effectively reduce the postoperative complications and promote recovery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids ( PPH) for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse.Methods The 100 patients who suffered from rectal mucosa prolapse and were planning to take surgical treatment for the first time in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group .Patients in the treatment group(n=50) underwent PPH while patients in the control group (n=50) underwent traditional simplified mucosal plication technique .To observe the therapeutic effect of the two groups ,the average operation time ,average length of stay in hospital ,postoperative pain within 72 hours,postoperative anal function and postoperative complications of the two groups .Results There was no significant difference in the over-all treatment effect between the two groups(P>0.05).The average operation time, average length of stay in hospital,postoperative pain with-in 72 hours and postoperative anal function of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group ,and the differences were significant (P0.05).Conclusion Compare to the traditional simplified mucosal plication technique ,PPH technique has more advantages such as shorter operation time ,less anguish of patients,less complication,shorter hospitalization time,and higher security, which indicates PPH could become the preferred method for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse .
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the curative effect of tissue-selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ hemorrhoids.Methods The patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ hemorrhoids who underwent prolapse and hemorrhoids or tissue-selecting therapy stapler surgery in the department of General Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital and Xinhua Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Chongming Branch,from Jan.2013 to Jun.2014 were accepted and allocated to prolapse and hemorrhoids or tissue-selecting therapy stapler group.The peri-operative parameters about operative time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay and the time required to return to normal activity were compared by t test,The postoperative complications including pain assessment and the incidence of postoperative bleeding,urine retention,faecal urgency,fecal incontinence,anal stenosis,rectovaginal fistula and recurrence rate were compared by t test and chi-square test.Rank sum test was used to compare the recurrence rate and patient's satisfaction between the two groups.Results The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volum,postoperative hospital stay and the time required to return to normal activity in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group were signifcantly higher than those in the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group (P =0.021,P =0.003,P =0.001,P ＜0.001).The pain score of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group were all higher than those of the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group in the first post-operative defecation and in post-operative 24 hours and 72 hours (all P ＜ 0.001).The incidence of faecal urgency of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group in post-operative 1 month (18.6％) was higher than that of the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group (6.6％) (P =0.036).There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding,urinary retention,recurrence rate and patient's satisfaction between two group (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Tissue-selecting therapy stapler was superior to the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain and the incidence of faecal urgency.Long-term results demonstrate that tissue-selecting therapy stapler and prolapse and hemorrhoids have similar effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the analgesic effect and adverse reactions of three kinds of spinal anesthesia methods for procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsand explore the preferred anesthesia method. Methods Ninety patients with PPH were enrolled in our hospital in 2016. They were randomly divided into three groups(30 patients in each group):group A(combined spinal and epidural anesthesia),group B(one point of puncture continued epidural anesthesia),and group C(two points of puncture continued epidural anesthesia). The blood pressure,heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded before operation,intraoperative and postoper-ative processes. The anesthetic effect was graded,and the anesthesia effect,urination time and urinary retention were recorded. Results The anesthesia effect of the group A and the group C was significantly better than that of the group B(P < 0.05). The urination time of the group B and the group C was shorter than that of the group A (P < 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention in the group A was significantly higher than that in the group B andthe group C(P < 0.05). Conclusions The PPH can be completed under the combined spinal and epidural anesthesia and the two points of puncture continued epidural anesthesia with anesthesia effect and less traction reaction,but the latter will be a preferred option with the advantages of fast renewal and less urinary retention. It is worthy to be promoted widely.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the curative effect of tissue-selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ hemorrhoids.Methods The patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ hemorrhoids who underwent prolapse and hemorrhoids or tissue-selecting therapy stapler surgery in the department of General Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital and Xinhua Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Chongming Branch,from Jan.2013 to Jun.2014 were accepted and allocated to prolapse and hemorrhoids or tissue-selecting therapy stapler group.The peri-operative parameters about operative time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay and the time required to return to normal activity were compared by t test,The postoperative complications including pain assessment and the incidence of postoperative bleeding,urine retention,faecal urgency,fecal incontinence,anal stenosis,rectovaginal fistula and recurrence rate were compared by t test and chi-square test.Rank sum test was used to compare the recurrence rate and patient's satisfaction between the two groups.Results The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volum,postoperative hospital stay and the time required to return to normal activity in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group were signifcantly higher than those in the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group (P =0.021,P =0.003,P =0.001,P ＜0.001).The pain score of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group were all higher than those of the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group in the first post-operative defecation and in post-operative 24 hours and 72 hours (all P ＜ 0.001).The incidence of faecal urgency of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group in post-operative 1 month (18.6％) was higher than that of the tissue-selecting therapy stapler group (6.6％) (P =0.036).There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding,urinary retention,recurrence rate and patient's satisfaction between two group (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Tissue-selecting therapy stapler was superior to the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain and the incidence of faecal urgency.Long-term results demonstrate that tissue-selecting therapy stapler and prolapse and hemorrhoids have similar effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the analgesic effect and adverse reactions of three kinds of spinal anesthesia methods for procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsand explore the preferred anesthesia method. Methods Ninety patients with PPH were enrolled in our hospital in 2016. They were randomly divided into three groups(30 patients in each group):group A(combined spinal and epidural anesthesia),group B(one point of puncture continued epidural anesthesia),and group C(two points of puncture continued epidural anesthesia). The blood pressure,heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded before operation,intraoperative and postoper-ative processes. The anesthetic effect was graded,and the anesthesia effect,urination time and urinary retention were recorded. Results The anesthesia effect of the group A and the group C was significantly better than that of the group B(P < 0.05). The urination time of the group B and the group C was shorter than that of the group A (P < 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention in the group A was significantly higher than that in the group B andthe group C(P < 0.05). Conclusions The PPH can be completed under the combined spinal and epidural anesthesia and the two points of puncture continued epidural anesthesia with anesthesia effect and less traction reaction,but the latter will be a preferred option with the advantages of fast renewal and less urinary retention. It is worthy to be promoted widely.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)in the treatment of outlet obstructive constipation caused by moderate and severe recto-cele. Methods A total of 48 patients with moderate or severe rectocele were treated with PPH. Patients were followed up for 4 ~ 6 months. The preoperative and postoperative parameters from rectoanal manome-try were compared and analyzed. Results After the surgery,patients had loose stool for 1 ~ 2 times a day. Sense of defecation obstruction in all patients was obviously improved. After the surgery,there were no significant changes in rectum resting pressure,anal resting pressure and various rectal sensitivity( P >0. 05). However,the decrease of inside rectal pressure and residual anal pressure were significantly re-duced(P < 0. 05). Conclusion The subjective defecation feeling of postoperative patients with PPH is unblock. Objective results of rectoanal manometry is clearly improved and the function of the rectum and anal canal is obviously restored.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate complications from two anal stapling operations of anorectal surgery,the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR).Methods The data of 1 276 patients undergoing PPH for hemorrhoids and 149 patients having STARR for ODS from January 2010 to January 2015,in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital were studied.More than six months of follow-up was done.Statistics used included t Test and Chi-square test,Logistic regression analysis.Results Complications of PPH and STARR included hemorrhage in 27 cases (2.1％) vs.3 cases (2.0％);pain in 285 cases (22.3％) vs.6 cases (4.0％);uroschesis in 96 cases (7.5％) vs.12 cases (8.1％);edema in 227 cases (17.8％) vs.16 cases (10.7％);defecatory urgency in 194 cases (15.2％) vs.38 cases (25.5％);anastomotic infection in 17 cases (1.3％) vs.2 cases (1.3％);mild anal incontinence in 11 cases (0.9％) vs.2 cases (1.3％);anastomotic stenosis in 11 cases (0.9％) vs.1 case (0.7％).There was a positive correlation between dry stool,defecatory urgency and hemorrhage after PPH.PPH compared to STARR:The post-operative pain,edema and defecatory urgency and overall complication rate was significantly different (t =26.51,x2 =4.69,x2 =10.38,x2 =37.12,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions PPH and STARR have rare serious complications and easy to handle.Abnormal defecation such as dry stool and defecatory urgency is an important risk of hemorrhage.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical treatment of Doppler guided hemorrhoid artery ligation (DG-HAL) combined with ultrasound-knife excision for severe hemorrhoids. Methods Eighty-seven patients with sever hemorrhoids were divided into 2 groups by the different admission months, the patients in group A (odd-numbered month) were treated by DG-HAL combined with ultrasound-knife excision, and the patients in Group B (bimonthly) were treated by procedure for prolaps and hemorrhoids. The clinical date were compared between 2 groups. Results There were no statistical differences in postoperative pain score and total efficient rate between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operating time, total hospitalization expenses and the incidences of postoperative bleeding, long term postoperative anal discomfort in group A were significantly lower than those in group B: (25.5 ± 2.8) min vs. (36.8 ± 4.6) min, (7 859 ± 564) yuan vs. (10 728 ± 733) yuan, 0 vs. 12.8%(5/39) and 2.1%(1/48) vs. 17.9%(7/39), the patient satisfaction score was significantly higher than that in group B: (9.3 ± 0.7) scores vs. (8.1 ± 0.6) scores, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05). Conclusions DG-HAL combined with ultrasound-knife excision to treat severe hemorrhoids has the definite treatment, less trauma, fewer complications and cheaper hospitalization expenses.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect of three kinds of reverse trendelenburg position angle in block plane of prone position after subarachnoid anesthesia, in order to acquire the conformable reverse trendelenburg position angle of prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH). Methods Sixty patients having underwent the selective PPH were divided into 10° group, 20° group and 30° group by random digits table method with 20 cases each. Subarachnoid puncture was performed in the L3 - 4 processus spinosus gap, then 0.5%heavy density ropivacaine 2 ml was injected. After anesthesia, the operation bed was adjusted to reverse trendelenburg position 10° (10° group), 20° (20° group) and 30° (30° group). At the same time the patients changed to prone position, and the operation bed was changed to horizontal position before operation. The patients changed to jackknife position 10 min after drug injection of subarachnoid anesthesia. The sensory blockade after drug infusion, circulation function change, anesthetic effect and perioperative adverse reaction were observed. Results There were no statistical differences in operation start time and fixed time of anesthesia plane among 3 groups (P>0.05). The upper bound of sensory nerve block before horizontal position, upper bound of sensory nerve block before jackknife position, highest plane of sensory nerve block in 10° group were significantly higher than those in 20° group and 30° group: T(10.47 ± 0.65) vs. T(12.36 ± 0.72) and T(12.50 ± 0.54), T(10.12 ± 0.56) vs. T(11.82 ± 0.66) and T(11.99 ± 0.72), T(9.53 ± 0.71) vs. T(11.32 ± 0.78) and T(11.54 ± 0.83), and there were statistical differences (P0.05). The systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure levels 15 and 20 min after drug infusion in 10° group were significantly lower than those in 20° group and 30° group, systolic blood pressure:(120.40 ± 7.38) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. (131.82 ± 7.88) and (130.47 ± 7.57) mmHg, (119.55 ± 7.65) mmHg vs. (131.25 ± 9.67) and (130.23 ± 8.69) mmHg, diastolic blood pressure: (63.74 ± 6.54) mmHg vs. (71.36 ± 8.49) and (74.32 ± 7.54) mmHg, (61.59 ± 6.23) mmHg vs. (72.98 ± 7.39) and (73.75 ± 6.34) mmHg, and there were statistical differences (P0.05). No patients′ anesthesia effect was poor in 3 groups, but 4 cases in 30° group were good. Hypotension and tachycardia occurred in 2 cases in 10° group, respectively. Conclusions Immediately prone position after subarachnoid anesthesia can be adjusted by reverse trendelenburg position angle to get the appropriate level of anesthesia, and conformable reverse trendelenburg position angle of PPH is 20°.
ABSTRACT
Objective In order to provide clinical evidence of reducing postoperative complications of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and observe the effects of constipation on postoperative complications of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.Methods One hundred and sixty cases of hemorrhoid were divided into two groups according to whether suffering from constipation:there were eihgty cases who were suffered from constipation in the experimental group and eighty cases who were not suffered from constipation in the control group.All patients' postoperative bleeding,anal edema,stool impaction and satisfaction were observed within 30 days and these data were compared and analysed by using SPSS 13.0 software.Results In the experimental group,the postoperative bleeding incidence was 37.5 ％ (30/80),the anal edema incidence was 31.3 ％ (25/80),the stool impaction inci dence was 8.6％ (7/80),and the patients' satisfaction rate was 88.6％ (71/80).In the control group,the postoperative bleeding incidence was 18.6％ (15/80),the anal edema's incidence was 15.0％ (12/80),the stool impaction incidence was 1.3％ (1/80),and the patients' satisfaction rate was 97.5％ (78/80).All the indexes above were different statistically in the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion constipation could increase complications and reduce the degree of satisfaction after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of preoperative aescuven forte tablets in the prevention of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) complications.Methods One hundred and seventy-nine patients underwent PPH in the Erlonglu Hospital of Beijing from June 2013 to June 2014 were divided into postoperative aescuven forte tablets group (n =90) and preoperative aescuven forte tablets group (n =89).The postoperative pain,bleeding,retention of urine,anal swelling,length of stay in hospital and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence of postoperative pain,bleeding,retention of urine,anal swelling were lower than in the preoperative aescuven forte tablets group (pain after operations rate:7.9％ (7/89) vs.20.0％ (18/90),x2 =5.484,P＜ 0.05;Wound bleeding:0 vs.6.7 ％ (6/90),P =0.026;retention of urine:9.0％ (8/89) vs.20.0％(18/90),x2 =4.370,P＜0.05;anal swelling:1.1％(1/89) vs.8.9％(8/90),P=0.035),and length of stay in hospital was shorter(11.9±3.9) d vs.(13.3 ±5.0) d,t=3.134,P＜0.05).There was no recurrence both of two groups follow up for more than 2 months.Conclusion Preoperative oral aescuven forte tablets of 2 h can reduce PPH complications and worthy of popularization and application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of multiple positioning procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment of connective tissue type mixed hemorrhoids,and compare the results between PPH and Milligan-Morgan surgery.Methods One hundred and sixteen patients with connective tissue type mixed hemorrhoids were divided into treatment group (62 cases) and control group (54 cases)according to random digits table method.The patients in treatment group received multiple positioning PPH,and the patients in control group received Milligan-Morgan surgery.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain score,anal margin edema,wound healing time,perianal scar,anorectal stenosis,anal discharge and anorectal resting pressure were evaluated and compared between 2 groups.Results The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group:(15.0 ± 2.3) min vs.(35.0 ± 3.4) min and (5.0 ± 2.1) ml vs.(15.0 ± 3.2) ml,and there were statistical differences (P ＜ 0.05).The postoperative pain score and wound healing time in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group:(4.83 ± 0.62) scores vs.(7.82 ± 0.37) scores and (8.2 ± 2.6) d vs.(17.4 ± 3.8) d,the rates of anal margin edema,perianal scar and anorectal stenosis in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group:8.1％ (5/62) vs.37.0％ (20/54),0 vs.29.6％ (16/54) and 1.6％(1/62) vs.16.7％ (9/54),and there were statistical differences (P ＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01).The postoperative anorectal resting pressure was significantly lower than preoperative in control group:(13.80 ± 4.20) kPa vs.(17.20 ± 5.87) kPa,and there was statistical difference (P＜ 0.05).One patient (1.6％,1/62) in treatment group occurred anal discharge,and 10 patients (18.5％,10/54) occurred anal discharge in control group.The rate of anal discharge in treatment group was significantly lower than that in control group,and there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.01).Conclusions Multiple positioning PPH is effective for the treatment of connective tissue type mixed hemorrhoids.It improves the controllability of the amount of removal and the excision site.It decreases the incidence of anal margin edema,perianal scar and anal discharge scar,which provides an effective protection for the anal function.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treating hemorrhoids.Methods 78 patients with symptomatic Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree hemorrhoids undergoing PPH were selected in this study.The diagnosis,medical history,operative time,blood loss and perioperative complications were recorded.The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale(WHOQOL-BREF) was observed preoperation and 6 hours,24 hours,1 month postoperation.Results The postoperative pain score measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative six hours was (7.6 ± 2.1),which reduced to (1.3 ± 1.1) at 24 hours.There was significant improvement in the overall perception of QOL,health,and in physical and psychological domains (t =1.901,1.805,1.714,P =0.041,0.038,0.029,all P ＜ 0.05).There was modest improvement in environmental domain,while no change was found in social domain (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion PPH surgery achieves good clinical results,improved quality of life of patients,with a low incidence of complications,patients with hemorrhoids should be recommended for this preferred surgical approach.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical treatment of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with transrectal Block for rectocele (Block procedure).Methods Eighty-six hospitalized patients with rectocele were divided into two groups according the odevity of month:A group (odd month,PPH combined with Block procedure group,49 cases) and B group [even month,stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR),37 cases].The treatment conditions were compared between two groups.Results There were no statistical differences in degree of postoperative pain,healing rate between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The operating time,postoperative hemorrhage rate,cost of hospitalization,patient satisfaction score and rectocele depth after 1 year in A group were significantly better than those in B group [(25.5 ± 2.8) min vs.(36.8 ± 4.6) rmin,2.0％(1/49) vs.13.5％(5/37),(7 359 ± 580) yuan vs.(10 928 ± 610) yuan,(9.1 ± 0.8) scores vs.(8.2 ± 0.7) scores,(5.02 ± 0.71) mm vs.(9.73 ± 1.31) mm],there were statistical differences (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions PPH combined with Block procedure for rectocele had a significant clinical effect,it is a safe new method with small surgical trauma,a better choice to prevent the recurrence of rectocele,reduces the patients economic pressure obviously.So it is worth to clinical promotion.