ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is commonly performed and widely accepted for the treatment of acute infections following hip arthroplasty. The aims of this study were to: i) determine the DAIR success rate in treating acute postoperative and hematogenous periprosthetic infections of the hip at a tertiary hospital, ii) identify possible outcome predictors, and iii) analyze clinical and radiological outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of acute postoperative (≤3 months from index procedure) and hematogenous periprosthetic infections following total hip arthroplasty treated with DAIR at our hospital between 2004 and 2015. Overall, 26 hips (25 patients) were included in the study, with a mean age of 72.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 9.4). The mean follow-up was 48.5 months (SD, 43.7). Several variables (e.g., patient characteristics, infection type, surgery parameters) were examined to evaluate their influence on outcomes; functional and radiographic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The overall success rate of DAIR was 26.9%. The male sex was associated with treatment failure (P=0.005) and debridement performed by a surgeon in hip unit with success (P=0.028). DAIR failure increased in patients with chronic pulmonary disease (P=0.059) and steroid therapy (P=0.062). Symptom duration of <11 days until DAIR yielded a better infection eradication rate (P=0.068). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was 74.2 (SD, 16.6). CONCLUSION: DAIR, despite being used frequently, had a high failure rate in our series. Outcomes improved if an experienced hip arthroplasty surgeon performed the surgery. Patient comorbidities and symptom duration should be considered for decision-making.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthroplasty , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Comorbidity , Debridement , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Lung Diseases , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty, debridement with prosthesis retention may be performed for implant salvage, but the reported success rates are highly variable. Hence we reviewed the outcome of radical debridement and retention of prosthesis using established diagnostic criteria and surgical procedures in relation to significant variables including clinical characteristics, pathogenicity, and antibiotic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (11 men and 9 women) with early prosthetic joint infection after unilateral hip arthroplasty, treated by radical debridement with retention of prosthesis from January 2000 to May 2011. Average follow-up period was 55 months (12-178 months). The outcome was evaluated and analyzed based on recurrence of infection and clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological criteria. RESULTS: Pathogens were isolated from 11 hips (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] in three, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis [MRSE] in two, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA] in one, Acinetobacter baumannii in two, Enterococcus faecalis in two patients, and Enterococcus, Citrobacter species in one). The mean duration of antibiotic administration was 43.5 days. Recurrence of infection was not observed in any case. Average Harris hip score was 91 points at the last follow-up. Revision surgery was not required for any reason including implant failure. Dislocation occurred in two hips after debridement and was treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Radical debridement with prosthesis retention is an effective procedure for early prosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty in carefully selected patients and with early diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Acinetobacter baumannii , Arthroplasty , Citrobacter , Debridement , Joint Dislocations , Early Diagnosis , Enterococcus , Enterococcus faecalis , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Joints , Methicillin Resistance , Prostheses and Implants , Prosthesis Retention , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidis , VirulenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The early diagnosis and detection of prosthetic infection after TKA is very important and difficult for deter- mination of the plan in management and reduction of complications. In these reasons, this study was performed to evaluate the usefulness and limitation of (99m)Tc-HMPAO(Technetium (99m)-hexamethyl- propylene amine oxime)-labeled WBC scan in the patients with clinically suspicious prosthetic infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study subjects were 25 patients(3 men and 19 women, mean age: 66.5 years) performed (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC scan in the patients with clinically suspicious prosthesis infection after TKA from January, 2005 to May, 2007. And in 6 patients who had undergone bilateral arthroplasty, we regarded one patient as two cases. Thus, total 31 prostheses were included in this study. Final diagnosis of infection was based on bacteriological result by intrao- perative cultures, surgical findings, and histological evidence intraoperatively obtained in the suspicious site and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: In the final diagnosis, we confirmed that total 16 prosthetic joints were infected. Of these infected prostheses, increased (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC scan uptake waspositive in 15, negative in 1. Finally, 15 cases were confirmed as nonin- fected prosthesis, 6 showed positive by (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC scan uptake, 9 showed negative. Over all sensitivity, speci- ficity, and positive predictive value for diagnosisof infected TKA were 93.75, 60%, and 71.43%. CONCLUSION: (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC scan was a highly sensitive method for the diagnosis of prosthetic infection after TKA. But low specificity and high false positive of (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC scan demand more clinical follow-up for confirmed diagnosis. To increase specificity, additionally scan will be needed.