Diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway function test for chronic cough / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway function test to replace bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test in differentiating cough variant asthma (CVA) from eosinophilic bronchitis (EB).Methods:The clinical data of 105 patients with chronic cough admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Hubei, Jianghan University from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients consisted of 40 patients with CVA (CVA group), 25 patients with EB (EB group), and 40 patients with other chronic coughs (other chronic cough group). FeNO and lung function were compared between groups. The value of FeNO, small airway function, and their combination in differentiating CVA from EB were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curves.Results:FeNO level was the highest in the CVA group [33.0 (30.0, 37.8) ppb], followed by the EB group [28.0 (25.5, 32.0) ppb], and the lowest in other chronic cough group [13.0 (11.0, 15.0) ppb]. There was significant difference in FeNO level between groups ( H value = 79.00, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1), FEV 1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) between groups (all P > 0.05). Maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) [74 (66.0, 77.4) in the CVA group, 80 (79.0, 83.3) in the EB group, 88.0 (86.4, 90.0) in other chronic coughs group], FEF25 (%) [70.0 (60.3, 75.1) in the CVA group, 78.0 (74.1, 85.0) in the EB group, 81.7 (78.9, 86.3) in other chronic coughs group], FEF50 (%) [75.2 (67.1, 80.8) in the CVA group, 80.6 (75.7, 85.9) in the EB group, 89.4 (87.0, 90.5) in other chronic coughs group], FEF75 (%) [76.4 (68.7, 85.8) in the CVA group, 80.9 (77.4, 89.7) in the EB group, 90.8 (87.2, 94.2) in other chronic coughs group] were significantly lower in the CVA group than those in other chronic coughs group. With the exception of FEF25 (%), MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) were significantly lower in the EB group compared with other chronic coughs group. MMEF (%) and FEF25 (%) in the CVA group were significantly lower compared with the EB group. There were significant differences in MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) between groups ( H = 62.82, 47.04, 47.41, 49.11, all P < 0.01). There were significant differences in FEF50 (%) and FEF75 (%) between CVA and EB groups (both P > 0.05). In binary logistic regression equation, FeNO and MMEF (%) were important indexes to distinguish CVA from EB ( P < 0.05). Bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test were used as the gold standard to distinguish CVA from EB. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used separately to distinguish CVA from EB, the optimal threshold value was 30.0 ppb and 77.7 respectively, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 and 0.82 respectively, the diagnostic sensitivity was 70% and 77.5% respectively, and the diagnostic specificity was 72% and 88% respectively. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used in combination to distinguish CVA from EB, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 96% respectively. Conclusion:FeNO and MMEF (%) can be used to distinguish CVA from EB. FeNO combined with MMEF (%) has a higher value in distinguishing CVA from EB than FeNO and MMEF alone.

Value of allergen nasal provocation test in assessment of the efficacy of house dust mites specific immunotherapy / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the value of nasal provocation test（NPT） in evaluating the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy（AIT） in patients with dust mite induced allergic rhinitis（AR）. Methods:A total of 83 patients with dust mite induced AR with/without asthma were included. Symptom score（SS）, daily medication score（DMS）, combined symptom and medication score（CSMS）, rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire（RQLQ）, NPT and skin prick test（SPT） were assessed before and after 1 year AIT. Results:There were statistical differences in SS（P<0.000 1）, DMS（P<0.000 1）, CSMS（P<0.000 1）, and RQLQ（P<0.000 1） after 1 year of AIT compared with pre-treatment. The effective rate of CSMS was 73.49%, and the effective rate of NPT was 42.17%. CSMS was consistent with NPT in efficacy assessment（Kappa=0.437, P<0.001）; while in 54 patients with pre-treatment NPT concentrations other than the original concentration, CMSM and NPT showed better consistence（Kappa=0.895, P<0.001）. Among the 48 patients with ineffective NPT assessment in the first year, 25 patients completed the second-year follow-up, and 12 patients（48.00%） showed effective in NPT. However, 10 out of 12 patients（83.33%） with NPT concentration other than original solution pre-treatment showed effective NPT at the second year. Conclusion:NPT can be used as one of the indicators for efficacy evaluation for dust mite induced AR patients, especially for patients with positive NPT induced at lower concentrations before treatment.

Evaluation of subjective scale in allergen nasal provocation test / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To compare the clinical value of visual analogue scale （VAS）, Lebel scale and total nasal symptom scores （TNSS） in evaluating nasal allergen provocation test （NAPT）. Methods:A total of 151 patients suspected of allergic rhinitis admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of our hospital from April 2020 to September 2020 were included, of which 76 were positive for house dust mites and 75 were negative for allergens. Nasal airway resistance（NAR） was measured by active anterior nasal manometry. Nasal symptoms were evaluated by VAS, Lebel and TNSS. House dust mite allergen was used for NAPT by spray method. An increase≥40% in NAR was used as the gold standard for objective evaluation of NAPT. ROC curves of VAS, Lebel and TNSS were drawn to compare the evaluation effectiveness of different subjective evaluation methods, and the optimal critical point of each ROC curve was obtained. Results:With NAR increased by ≥40% as the gold standard, the area under ROC curve of VAS was 0.884, and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.75% and 80.65%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of Lebel was 0.773, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 75.81%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of TNSS was 0.792, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 79.03%, respectively. There was no significant difference between Lebel and TNSS（P>0.05）. The VAS differed significantly from Lebel and TNSS（P<0.05）. The Kappa values of VAS, Lebel, TNSS and NAR were 0.803, 0.432 and 0.459, respectively. Conclusion:The VAS, Lebel, TNSS subjective scale and NAR are consistent in evaluating the efficacy of NAPT, with the VAS assessment showing highest consistency with NAR. As objective assessment instruments are not widely used in China, subjective assessment method could be adopted to evaluate the efficacy of NAPT in clinical practice, and VAS scale is recommended as a priority.

Research progress and clinical application of allergen nasal provocation test / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

The allergen nasal provocation testing（NPT）, in which allergens are applied directly to the nasal mucosa under standard and controlled conditions to provoke the main symptoms of allergic rhinitis（AR）, reproduces the response of the upper respiratory tract to natural exposure to allergens under controlled conditions and is the only test currently available to confirm nasal reactivity to allergens. It is invaluable in studying the mechanisms of AR and in assessing the response to novel anti-allergic treatments. The test may play an increasingly important role in clinical practice, especially in the identification of local AR, the diagnosis of occupational AR, the clarification of the composition of allergens, the assessment of the efficacy of AR treatment and the selection of candidates undergoing allergen immunotherapy. This article reviewed the application of NPT in the diagnosis of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, and also introduces the indications, contraindications, advantages and limitations of NPT in evaluating nasal response.

Leukotriene D4 bronchial provocation test for detection of airway hyper-responsiveness in children / 南方医科大学学报

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the value of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) bronchial provocation test (BPT) in detection of airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) in children.@*METHODS@#A total of 151 children aged 6 to 14 years, including 86 in remission of asthma and 65 with acute bronchitis, who were followed up in our respiratory clinic between November, 2017 and August, 2018. The children were randomly divided into LTD4 group (78 cases) and methacholine (MCH) group (73 cases). In LTD4 group, the 78 children underwent LTD4-BPT, including 46 with asthma and 32 children having re-examination for previous episodes of acute bronchitis; in MCH group, the 73 children underwent MCH-BPT, including 40 with asthma and 33 with acute bronchitis. MCH-BPT was also performed in the asthmatic children in the LTD4 group who had negative responses to LTD4 after an elution period. The major adverse reactions of the children to the two BPT were recorded. The diagnostic values of the two BPT were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.@*RESULTS@#There was no significant difference in the results of basic lung function tests between LTD4 group and MCH group (>0.05). The positive rate of BPT in asthmatic children in the LTD4 group was significantly lower than that in the MCH group (26.1% 72.5%; < 0.05). The positive rate of BPT in children with previous acute bronchitis in the LTD4 group was lower than that in the MCH group (3.1% 15.2%). The positive rate of MCH-BPT in asthmatic children had negative BPT results in LTD4 group was 58.8%, and their asthma was mostly mild. The sensitivity was lower in LTD4 group than in MCH group (0.2609 0.725), but the specificity was slightly higher in LTD4 group (0.9688 vs 0.8485).The area under ROC curvein LTD4 group was lower than that in MCH group (0.635 0.787). In children with asthma in the LTD4 group, the main adverse reactions in BPT included cough (34.8%), shortness of breath (19.6%), chest tightness (15.2%), and wheezing (10.9%). The incidence of these adverse reactions was significantly lower in LTD4 group than in MCH group ( < 0.05). Serious adverse reactions occurred in neither of the two groups.@*CONCLUSIONS@#LTD4-BPT had high safety in clinical application of children and was similar to the specificity of MCH-BPT. However, it had low sensitivity, low diagnostic value, and limited application value in children's AHR detection.

Actualización de la prueba de provocación bronquial con ejercicio (PPBE) / Update of the bronchial provocation test with exercise

The bronchial challenge test with exercise aims to demonstrate the presence of exercise-induced bronchial hyperreactivity, characteristic of bronchial asthma. Its realization is well standardized, requiring special environmental conditions, preparation and submaximum effort of the patient. The response is measured by spirometry, and it is considered a positive exercise test a drop in the expired volume at the first second (FEV1) of 10%. This article describes the elements necessary to facilitate this exam, according to national and international standards and guidelines.

La prueba de provocación bronquial con ejercicio tiene como objetivo demostrar la presencia de hiperreactividad bronquial inducida por ejercicio, característica del asma bronquial. Su realización está bien estandarizada, requiriendo de condiciones ambientales especiales, preparación y esfuerzo submáximo del paciente. La respuesta se mide mediante espirometría, y se considera una prueba de provocación con ejercicio positivo, a una caída del volumen espirado al primer segundo (VEF1) del 10%. En este artículo se describen los elementos necesarios para facilitar la realización de este examen, acorde a normas y guías nacionales e internacionales.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Diagnosis of Vasospastic Angina: Comparison with Invasive Coronary Angiography and Ergonovine Provocation Test

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic validity of coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) in vasospastic angina (VA) and factors associated with discrepant results between invasive coronary angiography with the ergonovine provocation test (iCAG-EPT) and cCTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 1397 patients diagnosed with VA from 2006 to 2016, 33 patients (75 lesions) with available cCTA data from within 6 months before iCAG-EPT were included. The severity of spasm (% diameter stenosis [%DS]) on iCAG-EPT and cCTA was assessed, and the difference in %DS (Δ%DS) was calculated. Δ%DS was compared after classifying the lesions according to pre-cCTA-administered sublingual nitroglycerin (SL-NG) or beta-blockers. The lesions were further categorized with %DS ≥ 50% on iCAG-EPT or cCTA defined as a significant spasm, and the diagnostic performance of cCTA on identifying significant spasm relative to iCAG-EPT was assessed. RESULTS: Compared to lesions without SL-NG treatment, those with SL-NG treatment showed a higher Δ%DS (39.2% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.002). However, there was no difference in Δ%DS with or without beta-blocker treatment (35.1% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.643). The significant difference in Δ%DS associated with SL-NG was more prominent in patients who were aged < 60 years, were male, had body mass index < 25 kg/m2, and had no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. Based on iCAG-EPT as the reference, the per-lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of cCTA for VA diagnosis were 7.5%, 94.0%, 60.0%, 47.1%, and 48.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients with clinically suspected VA, confirmation with iCAG-EPT needs to be considered without completely excluding the diagnosis of VA simply based on cCTA results, although further prospective studies are required for confirmation.

Diagnostic value of water swallow test and simple two-step swallowing provocation test for aspiration in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) / 中国实用内科杂志

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of water swallow test(WST)and simple two-step swallowing provocation test(SSPT)in the diagnosis of aspiration in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS:87 hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University during the period between December 2014 to December 2015. RESULTS: The number of patients of grade1,2,3,4 and 5 of water swallow test successively were 44,39,4,0 and 0. Patients with positive aspiration by the first-step(water injection of 0.4 mL)and the second-step(water injection of 2.0 m L)were 16 and 0. Patients with positive aspiration by radionuclide imaging was 35. Comparison of radionuclide imaging, the rate of missed diagnosis applying water swallow test was high 37.3%(31/83). Both the water swallow test and simple two-step swallowing provocation test have poor consistency with radionuclide imaging in the diagnosis of aspiration in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(McNemar consistency test P=0.00).CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of missed diagnosis applying water swallow test and simple two-step swallowing provocation test to diagnosis aspiration in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD),and combined use of multiple assessment methods can reduce the missed diagnosis rate of aspiration.

Application value of simple exercise provocation test combined with small airway function test in early diagnosis of cough variant asthma / 中国综合临床

Objective To explore the value of simple exercise provocation test ( 6?minute running test) combined with small airway function test in early diagnosis of cough variant asthma ( CVA ) in children.Methods Ninety?four children with chronic cough from September 2017 to September 2018 in the pediatric clinic of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were selected for routine pulmonary ventilation function examination,simple exercise stimulation test and questionnaire survey.The differences of pulmonary function,clinical manifestations and allergens between positive and negative children with simple exercise stimulation test were compared and analyzed.Results The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 94 children with chronic cough were all more than 70% by routine pulmonary function test,and the exercise provocation test was successfully completed.Among them,32 (34.04%) were positive in simple exercise provocation test.Among the positive patients,30 cases ( 93.75%) were diagnosed as CVA after further examination,clinical treatment and follow?up.In CVA group, FEV1 ( 81.52 ± 14.22)%,forced vital capacity (FVC) (89.00 ± 14.31)%, peak expiratory flow ( PEF) ( 65.05 ± 15.10)%, one?second rate (FEV1／FVC) (92.18±13.59)%,and instantaneous flow at 50% forced expiratory flow were observed after exercise.The vital capacity ( FEF50 ) ( 57.57 ± 22.49 )%, forced expiratory flow at 75% vital capacity (FEF75) (41.15±18.28)%,maximum expiratory flow ( MMEF75／25) (53.14±22.53)% were significantly lower than those before exercise ((94.07±9.69)%,( 92.30± 13.60)%,(80.73± 17.85)%,(101.07± 13.79)%,(66.71±19.29)%,(51.32±18.38)%,(63.75±19.43)%),(t values were 8.592 ,2.617 , 10.246 ,5.428,3.590 ,3.646 ,3.687 ,respectively,all P＜0.05)) In routine examination of pulmonary ventilation function,FEF50 (66.71 ± 19.29)% and FEF75 ( 51.32 ± 18.38)% in the positive group were significantly lower than those in the negative group (( 79.75 ± 21.94)%、( 69.08 ± 29.28)%),( t values were －2.841,－3.123,all P＜0.01).The proportion of night cough,morning cough and severe dry cough in positive group was significantly higher than that in negative group,while the proportion of day cough and wet cough was significantly lower than that in negative group ( P＜0.01).The proportion of eczema history in positive group was significantly higher than that in negative group ( P＜0.01).Conclusion Patients with CVA have high airway responsiveness and small airway dysfunction.Combination of simple motor stimulation test and small airway function test has important clinical value in the early diagnosis of CVA.

Dyspnea Perception During Induced Bronchoconstriction Is Complicated by the Inhaled Methacholine in Children With Clinical Asthma

PURPOSE: Dyspnea is not widely utilized as an indicator of asthma provocation despite its universal presentation. We hypothesized that dyspnea severity was proportionate with the lung function decline, methacholine dose-step, and the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 73 children's bronchial provocation test data with an assessment of dyspnea at every dose-step. Dyspnea severity was scored using a modified Borg (mBorg) scale. A linear mixed effect analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the mBorg scale, the percentage fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (ΔFEV1%), the methacholine dose-step, and the degree of BHR (BHR grade). RESULTS: Subjects were divided into 5 BHR groups based on their last methacholine dose-steps. The mBorg scores did not differ significantly among BHR groups (P=0.596, Kruskal-Wallis test). The linear mixed effect analysis showed that ΔFEV1% was affected by the methacholine dose-step (P < 0.001) and BHR grade (P < 0.001). The mBorg score was affected by the dose-step (P < 0.001) and BHR grade (P=0.019). We developed a model to predict the mBorg score and found that it was affected by the methacholine dose-step and ΔFEV1%, elevating it by a score of 0.039 (χ² [1]=21.06, P < 0.001) and 0.327 (χ² [1]=47.45, P < 0.001), respectively. A significant interaction was observed between the methacholine dose-step and ΔFEV1% (χ² [1]=16.20, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In asthmatic children, inhaled methacholine, as well as the degree of BHR and lung function decline, may affect dyspnea perception during the bronchial provocation test. If we wish to draw meaningful information from dyspnea perception, we have to consider various complicating factors underlying it.

Methacholine bronchial provocation test in patients with asthma: serial measurements and clinical significance

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The methacholine bronchial provocation test (MBPT) is used to detect and quantify airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR). Since improvements in the severity of asthma are associated with improvements in AHR, clinical studies of asthma therapies routinely use the change of airway responsiveness as an objective outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serial MBPT and clinical profiles in patients with asthma. METHODS: A total of 323 asthma patients were included in this study. The MBPT was performed on all patients beginning at their initial diagnosis until asthma was considered controlled based on the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. A responder was defined by a decrease in AHR while all other patients were considered non-responders. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients (66%) were responders, while 110 patients (34%) were non-responders. The responder group had a lower initial PC20 (provocative concentration of methacholine required to decrease the forced expiratory volume in 1 second by 20%) and longer duration compared to the non-responder group. Members of the responder group also had superior qualities of life, compared to members of the non-responder group. Whole blood cell counts were not related to differences in PC20; however, eosinophil concentration was. No differences in sex, age, body mass index, smoking history, serum immunoglobulin E, or frequency of acute exacerbation were observed between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The initial PC20, the duration of asthma, eosinophil concentrations, and quality-of-life may be useful variables to identify improvements in AHR in asthma patients.

Outcomes of drug provocation tests in Korean children with suspected drug hypersensitivity reaction

PURPOSE: Drug provocation tests (DPT) are the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs). However, there are little studies of DPT in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate DPT results and safety as diagnostic methods of DHR in Korean children. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 39 children under 18 years of age with a suspected DHR and performed DPT between January 2010 and May 2016 at Asan Medical Center. RESULTS: Total 110 DPT were performed in 39 children (20 boys and 19 girls) with a history of DHR. Clinical presentation of DHR included skin rash (n=7), pruritus (n=3), urticaria (n=18), angioedema (n=19), dyspnea (n=5), hoarseness (n=1), hypothermia (n=1), and anaphylaxis (n=5). The median age at the time of DPT was 9 years. Positive DPT were observed in 21 of 39 children (53.8%) and 28 of 110 cases (25.5%). Drugs causing positive reactions were acetaminophen in 50% (9 of 18), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 29.2% (14 of 48), cephalosporin in 9.1% (1 of 11), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in 50% (1 of 2), local anesthetics in 10% (1 of 10), and others (levodropropizine and idursulfase) in 15.4% (2 of 13). There was no statistical difference between children who had positive and negative results in sex, age, personal and parental history of allergic disease, eosinophil count, or total IgE level. Children with positive DPT did not develop anaphylaxis during the DPT procedure. CONCLUSION: Drug provocation test is safe, and it can be considered in children with suspected DHRs.

Characteristic changes of finger skin temperature in cold provocation test in workers with vibration white finger / 中国职业医学

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the changes of finger skin temperature in cold provocation test( CPT) in workers with vibration white finger( VWF). METHODS: A total of 245 male workers engaged in hand arm vibration operation was selected as study subjects using random number table method. All subjects were divided into VWF group( 73 persons) and control group( 172 persons). CPT( 10 ℃,10 min) was performed and the skin temperature of 6 fingers( index finger,middle finger and ring finger of both hands) was measured at pre-CPT adaptation period( 0,10,20,30 min) and after CPT period( 0,5,10,15,20,25,30 min). RESULTS: The effect of interaction between grouping and observe time was statistically significant on finger skin temperature( P < 0. 01). In the pre-CPT adaptation period,there was no statistically significant difference on skin temperature between 10 and 30 min time point in the two groups( P > 0. 05). After CPT,the fingers skin temperature of VWF group was lower than that of control group at 5 min time point( P < 0. 05),but there were no statistically significant differences on fingers skin temperature of other time points between the two groups( P > 0. 05).In both groups,the finger skin temperature at 0 min time point after CPT were lower than other time points in the same group( P < 0. 05),and the finger skin temperature increased with time( P < 0. 01). However,the finger skin temperature at 30 min after CPT did not restore to that at 30 min time point of pre-CPT. Except the VWF group,the abnormal rewarming temperature at 5 min time point after CPT of left index finger,the right index finger and the right ring finger were higher than that of the control group( 72. 6% vs 56. 4%,75. 3% vs 57. 6%,86. 3% vs 65. 1%,P < 0. 05),but there were no statistically significant differences on the abnormal rewarming temperature at 10,30 min time points of the six fingers in the two groups( P > 0. 05). There were no statistically significant differences on the detection rate of abnormal rewarming temperature between left index finger and the right index finger,or the right index finger and the right ring finger in the VWF group( 72. 6% vs 75. 3%,75. 3% vs 86. 3%,P > 0. 05). CONCLUSION: When CPT( 10 ℃,10 min) was performed in workers engaged in hand arm vibration operation,it is recommended to measure the finger skin temperature of index finger,and adaptation time before CPT can be adjusted to 10 min.

Role of astograph methacholine provocation test in diagnosis of bronchial asthma / 实用医学杂志

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of astograph methacholine provocation test for bronchial asthma.Methods A total of 238 asthma patients and 499 non-asthma patients participated in the detection by astograph methacholine provocation test.Statistical methods were used to analyze the differences of astograph parameters and find the indicators of asthma diagnosis and the critical value.Results Dmin,Cmin and PD15 were much lower in the asthma group (P ＜ 0.01),compared with the the non-asthma group,when SGrs,SGrs/Grs cont were much higher (P ＜ 0.01).SGrs was relevant with Dmin,Cmin,PD15 in the asthma group (P =0.000;r =0.685,r =0.657,r =0.639) as well as the SGrs/Grs cont did (P =0.000,r =0.775;r =0.740,r =0.708).In ROC analysis,Dmin presented an AUC of 0.661,the cutoff value was 2.71 unit,with a sensitivity of 0.739 and specificity of 0.551.PD15 presented an AUC of 0.746,the cutoff value was 4.856 5 unit,with a sensitivity of 0.693 and specificity of 0.684.Conclusion Astograph methacholine provocation test shows good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of asthma,particularly when Dmin ≤ 2.71 Unit or PD15 ≤ 4.8565 Unit as the cutoff value.

Efficacy of Nasal Cellulose Powder in the Symptomatic Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: Nasal Cellulose Powder (NCP), which can prevent from binding an allergen to nasal mucosa, may reduce allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms in dust mite-sensitized children. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of NCP in improving clinical symptoms of a nasal airflow limitation and the response of nasal inflammatory cells. METHODS: Children with dust mite-sensitized AR aged 6–18 years were recruited. After a 4-week run-in period, NCP or a placebo was administered, 1 puff per nostril 3 times daily for 4 weeks. The nasal provocation test (NPT) with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) was performed before and after treatment. The daily symptom scores (DSS), daily medication scores (DMS), the peak nasal inspiratory flows (PNIF), nasal airway resistance (NAR), as well as the maximum tolerated dose of NPT and eosinophil counts in nasal scraping, were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty children (30 NCP and 30 placebos) were enrolled. Before treatment, there were no significant differences in age, dust mite control measures, DSS, DMS, PNIF, NAR, the maximum tolerated dose of NPT, or nasal eosinophil scores between children receiving NCP and placebos. After treatment, there were no significant differences between the NCP and placebo groups in the median (range) of the outcomes—DSS: 2.06 (0.18–3.77) vs. 1.79 (0.08–7.79), P=0.756; DMS: 1.60 (0–5.13) vs. 0.56 (0–4.84), P=0.239; PNIF (L/min): 110 (60–160) vs. 100 (50–180), P=0.870; NAR (Pa/cm³/s): 0.40 (0.20–0.97) vs. 0.39 (0.24–1.32), P=0.690; the maximum tolerated dose of NPT and the nasal eosinophil scores: 1 (0–4) vs. 1 (0–4), P=0.861. CONCLUSIONS: NCP treatment may not be more effective than placebo treatment in dust mite-sensitized AR children.

Usefulness of House Dust Mite Nasal Provocation Test in Asthma

PURPOSE: We previously reported that the skin prick test was sensitive and the serum specific immunoglobulin E test was specific for predicting positive airway responses to house dust mites (HDMs) in patients with asthma. Because the nose and bronchus are one airway, the nasal provocation test would be more specific for predicting the bronchial responses to HDM than the skin test. METHODS: The allergy skin prick test and nasal and bronchial provocation tests using HDM (Dermatophagoides farinae) were performed in 41 young men (age, 19–28 years) who wanted military certification for asthma. The nasal responses to HDM was scored according to the severity of rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nose itching. RESULTS: The prevalence of a positive skin prick test to HDM did not significantly differ between patients with (n=24) and without (n=17) an early airway reaction (EAR; 79.2% vs 70.6%, P=0.534). However, the prevalence of a positive nasal test was significantly higher in the airway responders than in the others (37.5% vs 0%, P=0.005). The concordance of a positive response to the nasal test (κ=0.332, P=0.004) but not to the skin prick test (κ=0.091, P=0.529) was significant with an EAR. The diagnostic sensitivity of the nasal test (37.5%) was lower than that of the skin prick test (79.2%), but the specificity was higher (100% vs 29.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The skin prick test is more sensitive, whereas the nasal test is more specific and accurate, for predicting an EAR to HDM in patients with asthma.

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Local Allergic Rhinitis to House Dust Mites

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a localized nasal allergic response in the absence of systemic atopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LAR in Korean rhinitis patients compared to allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR). A total of 304 rhinitis patients were enrolled from November 2014 to March 2016. A skin prick test, serum total and specific immunoglobulin E, and a nasal provocation test (NPT) with house dust mite (HDM) were performed on all patients. Subjects also documented changes in rhinitis symptoms before and after NPT. Seventy-four patients with nasal hyper-reactivity and 80 patients with subclinical allergy were excluded. AR was diagnosed in 69 (46.0%) patients, NAR in 75 (50.0%) patients, and LAR to HDM in 6 (4.0%) patients. The average medication score and disease duration of each group were 14.5 points and 77.6 months in AR, 12.1 point and 51.1 months in NAR, and 17.7 point and 106.0 months in LAR, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline nasal symptom score of the three groups. However, after NPT with HDM, the score of rhinitis, itching, and obstructive were 4.83±1.47 vs. 1.95±2.53, 3.00±2.10 vs. 1.45±2.06, and 5.50±1.38 vs. 2.57±2.84 in LAR and NAR, respectively (p<0.05). LAR patients had longer duration of disease and tended to be older and have higher medication score than other rhinitis patients.

Inflammation characteristics of nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome / 医学研究生学报

Objective Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome (NARES) is associated with such diseases as bronchial asthma , nasal polyps , and aspirin intolerance , but there is a lack of studies on its inflammatory conditions .The aim of this study is to describe the inflammation characteristics of NARES . Methods This study included 101 cases of allergic rhinitis ( AR) , 39 cases of NARES, and 162 adult controls .We analyzed the inflammation char-acteristics of the patients using skin prick test ( SPT) , nasal douche , fractional exhaled nitric oxide ( FeNO ) measurement , serum eosino-phil (EOS) counting, serum total IgE (tIgE) determination, induced sputum detection, and nasal and bronchial provocation tests . Results Compared with the controls , the NARES and AR groups showed significant increases in the positive rate of nasal provocation (32.1%vs 69.2%and 75.2%, P<0.05), positive rate of bronchial provocation (1.2%vs 10.3%and 14.9%, P<0.05), and FeNO level ([15.70 ±5.20] ppb vs [37.25 ±22.95] and [39.00 ±24.29] ppb, P<0.05), as well as in the serum EOS and tIgE levels, EOS count, and ratio of EOS in the induced sputum (P<0.05).However, the level of serum tIgE was significantly lower in the NARES than in the AR group (53.3 [23.3-186.0] kU/L vs 197.0 [62.6-391.0] kU/L, P<0.05). Conclusion NARES is a syndrome with nasal, lower airway, and systematic inflammation, similar to AR in inflammatory intensity.Therefore, for patients with NARES, attention should be paid not only to upper airway but also to lower airway and systemic inflammation .

Comparative Study of Electromyography and Hand Elevation Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE: Since the hand elevation test was first introduced by Ahn in 2001, it has been one of most performing provocative test for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Although many studies have been published on the hand elevation test, there are no study that can explain why false-negative results of hand elevation test appears in carpal tunnel syndrome patients diagnosed by electromyography (EMG) findings. Therefore we searched out whether hand elevation test is related with EMG severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We made a retrospective study of 654 bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Among them 134 were studied which had different hand elevation test results on each hands. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the EMG severity of each group. The relationships between hand elevation test and EMG severity were examined using Pearson-product correlations. Comparing whether the frequency of false negative hand elevation were different between both hands, and whether the severity of EMG depends on which side of hand is, was evaluated with Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Severity of EMG in positive group was moderate to severe on average, whereas mild to moderate on negative group, with significant difference statistically (p<0.001). Correlation between the hand elevation test results and EMG severity also showed significance statistically (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Mild severity of EMG was found out to be the factor affecting the false results. However, EMG severity and hand elevation test shows a meaningful correlation, supporting the value of hand elevation test.

Successful administration of iodinated contrast media in a patient with anaphylaxis to multiple contrast media

Although hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are uncommon, their clinical impacts are considerable because of their wide use and potential fatality. The best way to prevent ICM-induced hypersensitivity is to avoid re-exposure to the ICM. However, ICM use is inevitable in the evaluation of many diseases. A 64-year-old male with renal cell carcinoma presented with anaphylaxis after computed tomography (CT) using iohexol. Intradermal test results were positive to iohexol, iomeprol, and ioversol. The following 3 CT scans using the test-negative agents iopromide, iopamidol, and iobitridol still provoked hypersensitivity reactions despite premedication using intravenous antihistamine and corticosteroid. For the next step, iodixanol, a nonionic iso-osmolar dimer, was tested by intravenous graded challenges in addition to the intradermal skin test, which and was confirmed to be negative. The patient underwent CT scan using iodixanol after premedication with chlorpheniramine 4 mg and methylprednisolone 40 mg, and hypersensitivity reactions did not recur. We report a case of a patient showing hyper reactivity to multiple ICMs despite negative intradermal skin tests, who eventually underwent successful enhanced CT scans after choosing ICM by the graded challenge test.