Psychometric properties of dyadic data from the Marital Quality Scale of Indonesian Javanese couples

Abstract Background Researchers have demonstrated that various measurement concepts and dimensions depend on context and timing. Objectives The current study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Javanese couples' marital quality scale based on validity and reliability Methods In total 840 participants or 420 marital dyad from Java, Indonesia, were involved in this study. The psychometrics properties scale was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant analysis, and composite reliability. Results The exploratory factor analysis found relationship quality to consist of support, physical proximity, warmth, communication, acceptance and respect, role sharing, and responsibility factors. Well-being quality consists of happiness, harmony, and problem-solving. The fit of the measurement model was obtained using confirmatory factor analysis. The fit model was also found in the husband's and wife's groups, with no differences between them. The high correlations between wife-husband factors also proved the validity based on convergent and discriminant evidence. The reliability coefficient was high for each dimension and construct. Discussion This analysis shows that the marital quality scale developed has information on psychometric properties that can be useful for researchers and the practicians using the marital quality instrument of Javanese couples in particular.

Psychometric properties of the sensory processing and self-regulation checklist-Tagalog version

BACKGROUND@#The Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC) is a parent or caregiver-reported instrument that measures a child’s self-regulation and sensory processing ability as they perform daily activities. The original version in Chinese and a more recent English version has reported favorable reliability and validity. While the SPSRC has undergone translation into a Tagalog version, its psychometric properties are unknown.@*OBJECTIVES@#This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the SPSRC-Tagalog.@*METHODS@#Reliability and validity properties were tested among a sample of Filipino children with (n= 45) and without disability (n= 45), based on the reports of the parents or caregivers on the SPSRC-Tagalog.@*RESULTS@#This study found that the SPSRC-Tagalog has good internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability, and good crosscultural, discriminant, structural, construct, and criterion validity.@*CONCLUSION@#The psychometric properties of the SPSRC-Tagalog corroborate with its other language versions in its reliability and validity to measure the sensory processing and self-regulation abilities in Filipino children with and without a disability. The information obtained from the SPSRC-Tagalog may be useful in informing our understanding of sensory processing difficulties among children.

Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample

Objective: We investigated: i) the reliability and validity of a Brazilian version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), developed to detect and characterize psychotic experiences in the general population; and ii) the association between psychotic experiences, childhood adversity, and cannabis use in a population-based sample. Methods: We performed factorial analyses and generalized linear models with CAPE scores as the dependent variable in a sample composed of 217 first-episode psychosis patients, 104 unaffected biological siblings, and 319 non-psychotic population-based participants. Results: After removing seven items from its positive dimension and two items from its negative dimension, a 33-item Brazilian version of the CAPE showed acceptable adjustment indices (confirmatory fit index = 0.895; goodness of fit index = 0.822; parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.761; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.055, p [RMSEA ≤ 0.05] = 0.04) and internal consistency in all its dimensions (> 0.70). Childhood adversity was associated with higher scores in all three dimensions, as well as with total score. Lifetime cannabis use was associated with higher scores only in the positive dimension. Conclusion: The proposed Brazilian version of the CAPE corroborates the tridimensional approach for assessing psychosis-proneness, and the frequency and severity of psychotic manifestations are distributed as a spectrum in the general population.

Comparative Study of Criteria on Quality of Questionnaire Development and Psychometric Property Evaluation / 世界科学技术-中医药现代化

This study was aimed to compare the criteria on quality of questionnaire development and psychometric property evaluation. The references listed in the ISOQOL and consequent included criteria were searched. Two reviewers independently screened papers to include articles with inclusion criteria as follows: fully evaluating the questionnaire development and/or psychometric property; published or unpublished, but not book. Two reviewers independently extracted the information which contained criteria name, types of questionnaire assessed, criteria purpose, research methods, content, evaluation method and etc. Qualitative analysis was conducted to synthesize common characteristics of criteria, and to compare what each criterion emphasized on. The results showed that 9 included criteria sharing the same purpose which evaluated the questionnaire development process and/or psychometric properties of the health related quality of life questionnaire or patient reported outcome. Experts consensus based on previous studies were the criteria development methods. The standard content included conceptual framework, targeted population, content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structure validity and responsiveness with interpretability. Assessment scoring system used in the criteria was categorized as 2- or 4-point Likert scales. Or document of evaluation evidence was required to be provided. It was concluded that nine criteria can be used to develop new questionnaires, evaluate existed/new questionnaires, or choose the right questionnaires for clinic, based on the following elements such as their research purpose, trials types, questionnaire types or questionnaire administrations.

Psychometric Properties of Korean Version of Drug Attitude Inventory(KDAI-10) / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of Korean version of 10 items of Drug Attitude Inventory (KDAI-10). METHODS: A total of 157 stabilized schizophrenic patients were entered into the study after completion of screening tests. They completed the KDAI-10. And then they were interviewed with various scales such as Subjective Response Scale (SRS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Extrapyramidal Side Effects Rating Scale (ESRS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Correlations of KDAI-10 with these scales were tested. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha used to measure the internal consistency of the scale, was high (0.83). Principal component analysis with varimax rotation produced 2 factors, which explained 50.37% of the total variances. The First factor including 6 items was the positive subjective feelings and the second factor including 4 items was the negative subjective feelings, which were identical to the original authors'. Individual item correlations with total scores were all statistically significant (r=0.48-0.72, p<.001). And correlations of KDAI-10 with SRS, PANSS, ESRS and GAF showed that they were significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: Although the results were not quite satisfactory, KDAI-10 was demonstrated to have good reliability and construct validity.

Statistical Contribution to Quality of Life (QOL) Evaluation / 薬剤疫学

Quality of life (QOL) evaluated by patients themselves has become one of the important outcomes in clinical practice as well as clinical trials. Recently clinicians have attempted to gather QOL evaluation data in their clinical practice setting and integrate the findings into the medical decision-making process. To date, several multidimensional generic questionnaires consisting of multiple domains such as functional, physical, mental and social well-being, have been developed and utilized for generic QOL evaluation in clinical trials, especially in the oncology area. To develop a well-constructed and valid QOL questionnaire, its psychometric characteristics such as reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility must be adequately assessed in the research setting.<BR>In clinical trials, QOL data are generally measured in a longitudinal fashion and there are two prominent embarrassing statistical problems : one is the multiplicity due to replication (in time) of statistical tests and the other is the occurrence of missing data due to a variety of reasons. Non-random missing data which occurs because of any reasons related to a patient's present status and/or future prognosis possibly leads to bias and misinterpretation of the results of a trial. To solve the multiplicity problem, the repeated-measures ANOVA-type data analysis or summarization of a repeated measures into an appropriate summary measure can be applied. Missing data can be prevented to some extent by allocating/training coordinators at each participating institute and establishing a communication network between a data center and participating institutes. However, missing data will occur inevitably due to the deterioration of a patient's physical status in the area of life threatening diseases suchas advanced cancer or other diseases with poor prognosis. Although several statistical approaches to cope with missing data even including non-random one have been proposed, there is no single complete analytical solution that can handle the non-random missing problem. The best remedy would be to collect information about reasons why the missing data occurred so that we can identify the missing mechanism and take it into account in a statistical analysis. A so-called “sensitivity analysis” of comparing the results of several analytical methods suchas different imputation techniques or newly proposed ideas would also be a useful approach. The QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) used the idea of weighting life time by utility evaluated by patients themselves and is coined for incorporating a patient's judgment into the treatment selection. Ultimately, an assessment of QOL should be utilized for “individualized” or “tailor-made” treatment and statistical methodology should be developed further for gathering, analyzing and utilizing QOL data.