Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Rev. invest. clín ; 75(3): 143-157, May.-Jun. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1515317

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT This review focuses on the effects and mechanisms of action of amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) and their adverse effects on the cardiovascular, nervous, and immune systems. ATS include amphetamine (AMPH), methamphetamine (METH, "crystalmeth," or "ice"), methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy," or "Molly"), MDMA derivatives (e.g., methylenedioxyamphetamine [MDA] and methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine [MDEA]), khat, and synthetic cathinones. The first section of this paper presents an overview of the historical aspects of ATS use, their initial clinical use, and regulations. The second part reviews the acute and chronic impact and the most salient clinical effects of ATS on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems, skin, and mouth. The chemical structure, pharmacokinetics, and classic and non-canonical pharmacological actions are covered in the third section, briefly explaining the mechanisms involved. In addition, the interactions of ATS with the central and peripheral immune systems are reviewed. The last section presents data about the syndemic of ATS and opioid use in the North American region, focusing on the increasing adulteration of METH with fentanyl.

2.
São Paulo med. j ; 141(4): e2021966, 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1432452

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has a prevalence of 5.3% among children and adolescents. It is characterized by attention deficit, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a survey involving pediatric neurologists in the management of ADHD and compare the results with the current literature and guidelines. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive analytical study of a virtual environment, was used Test of equality of proportions for comparison between two groups of pediatric neurologists (working as specialists for > 6 versus ≤ 6 years), with a significance level of P = 0.05. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a virtual questionnaire covering the steps in the diagnosis and treatment of children with ADHD. The inclusion criteria were professionals who had completed their residency/specialization in pediatric neurology and clinical neurologists working in pediatric neurology. RESULTS: Among the 548 electronic invitations sent, 128 were considered valid. For all participants, the diagnosis was clinically based on the disease classification manuals. Combination treatment promotes improvement of symptoms (96.9%). Among psychostimulants, short-acting methylphenidate was the most commonly prescribed medication (85.2%). Headache was the most common side effect (77.3%). Altogether, 73.4% of the participants requested laboratory tests, 71.1% requested an electrocardiogram, and 42.2% requested an electroencephalogram. Pediatric neurologists working as specialists for ≤ 6 years had more frequent referrals to psycho-pedagogists for diagnosis (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The participants complied with clinical guidelines, emphasizing the relevance of diagnostic manuals and treatment guidelines for an eminently clinical situation and enabling uniformity in quality treatment.

3.
Medicina (B.Aires) ; 80(supl.2): 63-66, mar. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1125109

ABSTRACT

El cociente Theta-Beta (T/B) del electroencefalograma cuantificado (EEGQ) de los pacientes con trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad (TDAH) constituye una variable del EEG característica del trastorno primario con una precisión global del 89%. El objetivo de este estudio es medir el cociente T/B de una población de con TDAH y los efectos del tratamiento farmacológico con psicoestimulantes y no psicoestimulantes sobre el cociente T/B. La muestra estaba formada por 85 sujetos de entre 6 y los 18 años (68 niños y 17 niñas) con el diagnóstico de TDAH de subtipo inatento y combinado, según los criterios del DSM-V. Se les realizó un EEGQ con medición del cociente T/B antes y después de 6 meses de tratamiento con fármacos psicoestimulantes y no psicoestimulantes. Se compararon ambos grupos mediante la prueba de rangos con signo de Wilcoxon para muestras relacionadas. En el 86% de los casos el cociente T/B fue elevado respecto de los valores normales para la edad. La reducción en el cociente T/B fue significativa en el grupo tratado con psicoestimulantes aunque la reducción con los no psicoestimulantes no fue significativa. En conclusión, se confirma la elevación del cociente T/B en los pacientes con TDAH. Los fármacos psicoestimulantes disminuyen de forma significativa el cociente T/B elevado en los pacientes con TDAH tras 6 meses de tratamiento.


Theta-Beta (T / B) ratio of the quantified electroencephalogram (EEGQ) in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) constitutes a characteristic EEG variable of the primary disorder with an overall accuracy of 89%. The objective of this study was to measure the T/B ratio in a sample of patients with ADHD and the effects of the treatment with psychostimulants and non-psychostimulants on the T/B ratio. The sample consisted of 85 children between 6 and 18 years (68 males and 17 females) with the diagnosis of the inattentive and combined subtype of ADHD, according to the criteria of the DSM-V. An EEGQ was performed with measurement of the T/B ratio before and after 6 months of treatment with psychostimulant and non-psychostimulant drugs. Both groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed range test for related samples. The results showed that 86% of the cases had a T/B ratio above the normal values for the age of them. The reduction in the T/B ratio was statistically significant in the group of patients treated with psychostimulants. The reduction of non-psychostimulants was not significant. In conclusion, we confirmed the high T/B ratio in patients with ADHD. Psychostimulant drugs decrease the elevated T/B ratio in patients with ADHD after 6 months of treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Theta Rhythm/physiology , Beta Rhythm/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Reference Values , Age Factors , Treatment Outcome , Statistics, Nonparametric
4.
Bio sci. (En línea) ; 3(5): 1-11, 2020. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIBOCS | ID: biblio-1141234

ABSTRACT

El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el consumo de psicoestimulantes en estudiante de la Universidad San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca. Se recolectaron los datos mediante encuestas aplicadas a 331 estudiantes. El estudio reveló el psicoestimulante de mayor consumo con 31,88% el café y la coca cola con 26,65%, en su mayoría fueron consumidos con fines académicos. En los efectos secundarios, la sed se estableció como el más frecuente en estudiantes con 30,74%, seguido por cefalea con 27,56% y el cansancio en 14,84%. Se concluye que el café se determina como psicoestimulante menor más consumido en épocas de actividad académica y la sed como el efecto secundario más frecuente.


The objective of the study was to determine the consumption of psychostimulants in a student at the San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca University. The data were collected through surveys applied to 331 students. The study revealed the psychostimulant with the highest consumption with 31.88%, coffee and coca cola with 26.65%, most of which were consumed for academic purposes. Regarding side effects, thirst was established as the most frequent in students with 30.74%, followed by headache with 27.56% and fatigue in 14.84%. It is concluded that coffee is determined as the minor psychostimulant most consumed in times of academic activity and thirst as the most frequent side effect.


Subject(s)
Coca , Coffee , Fatigue , Population , Rebound Effect , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1398190

ABSTRACT

El Síndrome X Frágil (SXF) es la principal causa heredada de Discapacidad intelectual (DI) y Trastorno del espectro autista (TEA). Se caracteriza por presentar un fenotipo conductual asociado a hiperactividad, déficit atencional, impulsividad, ansiedad, trastornos conductuales, espectro autista y retraso global del desarrollo. No existe actualmente un tratamiento farmacológico para el trastorno genético de base. El tratamiento farmacológico se focaliza en los síntomas que interfieren con la calidad de vida y aprendizaje, entre ellos la irritabilidad e hiperactividad. OBJETIVO: Evaluar cambios conductuales a través de la escala conductual ABC, de pacientes masculinos con diagnóstico de SXF tratados con psicoestimulantes y/o antipsicóticos en comparación a controles. MÉTODO: Se evalúa a 40 pacientes hombres con diagnóstico de SXF entre los años 2014 y 2017. Se utiliza la evaluación de la conducta mediante el puntaje en la subescala de irritabilidad e hiperactividad de la encuesta ABC-C y el registro de fármacos indicados. Se compara la sintomatología conductual en pacientes que no utilizan fármacos, aquellos que utilizan antipsicóticos, los que usan psicoestimulantes y pacientes tratados con ambos fármacos. RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad fue de 15,1 (±9,3) años. Del total de pacientes, el 42,5% reportó uso de fármacos, de éstos el 35% utilizó psicoestimulantes, 35% antipsicóticos y 30% la combinación de ambos. Se observa que solo el grupo que recibe tratamiento con psicoestimulantes y antipsicóticos en forma simultánea presenta diferencias con el subgrupo sin tratamiento farmacológico. CONCLUSIONES: En más de la mitad de nuestros pacientes se decide no utilizar tratamiento farmacológico. Sin embargo, dichos pacientes igualmente presentan sintomatología de irritabilidad e hiperactividad. Los pacientes que recibieron terapia asociada de psicoestimulantes y antipsicóticos presentan puntajes significativamente más altos en la escala de irritabilidad que aquellos que no recibieron tratamiento farmacológico. Este grupo, que constituye el 12,5% del total de la muestra, presenta un fenotipo conductual que genera mayores dificultades en la calidad de vida del paciente y su entorno.


Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the main inherited cause of Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder. It characteristically presents as a behavioral phenotype asso- ciated with hyperactivity, attention deficit, impulsivity, anxiety, behavioral disorders, autistic spectrum and global developmental delay. There is currently no pharmacological treatment for the underlying genetic disorder. Pharmacological treatment targets symptoms that interfere with quality of life and learning, including irritability and hyperactivity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate behavioral changes through the ABC behavioral scale of male patients diagnosed with FXS treated with psychostimulants and / or antipsychotics compared to controls. METHOD: 40 male patients with a diagnosis of FXS between 2014 and 2017 were evaluated. The behavioral assessment was done by scoring the irritability and hyperactivity subscale of the ABC-C survey and by registering the prescribed drug. Behavioral symptomatology was compared in patients who do not use drugs, those who use antipsychotics, those who use psychostimulants and patients treated with both drugs. RESULTS: The median age was 15.1 (± 9.3) years. Of the total of patients, 42.5% were prescribed drugs, of these 35% used psychostimulants, 35% antipsychotics and 30% the combination of both. It was observed that the group that received treatment with both psychostimulants and antipsychotics simultaneously presented differences with the subgroup without pharmacological treatment.CONCLUSIONS: In more than half of our patients no pharmacological treatment is prescribed. However, these patients also show symptoms of irritability and hyperactivity. Patients who received associated therapy of psychostimulants and antipsychotics have significantly higher scores on the irritability scale than those who did not receive pharmacological treatment. This group, which constitutes 12.5% of the total sample, has a behavioral phenotype that generates greater difficulties in the patient's quality of life and their environment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Fragile X Syndrome/psychology , Fragile X Syndrome/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Irritable Mood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Checklist , Problem Behavior
6.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 46(5): 426-432, maio 2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-675672

ABSTRACT

Neonatal handling induces several behavioral and neurochemical alterations in pups, including decreased responses to stress and reduced fear in new environments. However, there are few reports in the literature concerning the behavioral effects of this neonatal intervention on the dams during the postpartum period. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to determine if brief postpartum separation from pups has a persistent impact on the dam's stress response and behavior. Litters were divided into two neonatal groups: 1) non-handled and 2) handled [10 min/day, from postnatal day (PND) 1 to 10]. Weaning occurred at PND 21 when behavioral tasks started to be applied to the dams, including sweet food ingestion (PND 21), forced swimming test (PND 28), and locomotor response to a psychostimulant (PND 28). On postpartum day 40, plasma was collected at baseline for leptin assays and after 1 h of restraint for corticosterone assay. Regarding sweet food consumption, behavior during the forced swimming test or plasma leptin levels did not differ between dams briefly separated and non-separated from their pups during the postpartum period. On the other hand, both increased locomotion in response to diethylpropion and increased corticosterone secretion in response to acute stress were detected in dams briefly separated from their pups during the first 10 postnatal days. Taken together, these findings suggest that brief, repeated separations from the pups during the neonatal period persistently impact the behavior and induce signs of dopaminergic sensitization in the dam.


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Animals, Newborn , Corticosterone/blood , Leptin/blood , Maternal Deprivation , Motor Activity/physiology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Animals, Newborn/blood , Rats, Wistar , Swimming , Stress, Psychological/blood , Time Factors
7.
Rev. psiquiatr. clín. (Santiago de Chile) ; 49(2): 43-54, July-dec. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-702148

ABSTRACT

Psicoestimulantes (PSE), estabilizadores del ánimo (EA) y benzodiacepinas (BDZ) son psicofármacos frecuentemente utilizados en psiquiatría infantojuvenil y cuya indicación ha aumentado considerablemente en los últimos años. Los PSE son empleados principalmente en el déficit atencional, siendo la terapia de primera línea en pacientes sin comorbilidad. Modafinilo y anfetaminas serían igualmente efectivos y se utilizan con similar frecuencia en muchos países sin embargo existe evidencia de mayores riesgos con anfetaminas. Otros fármacos como atomoxetina, a-agonistas, bupropión y antidepresivos tricíclicos (imipramina) se utilizan como tratamiento de segunda o tercera línea. Los EA son especialmente útiles en el tratamiento del trastorno bipolar (TB) y se consideran agentes de primera línea: litio, ácido valproico (sodio divalproex) y algunos antipsicóticos atípicos. Otros EA que han demostrado efectividad en TB son lamotrigina, carbamazepina, oxcarbamazepina y topiramato. Las DBZ han sido poco estudiadas en población infantojuvenil, pero su uso no es infrecuente. Si bien no son una indicación de primera línea en trastornos de ansiedad, están indicadas como tratamiento adyuvante especialmente diazepam. Fluracepam tiene un rol en el tratamiento de insomnio en mayores de 15 años. Aunque el tratamiento de elección de muchas patologías de psiquiatría infantojuvenil es claro en diversas guías clínicas, la complejidad terapéuticas de estos pacientes muchas veces hace necesario el uso de psicofármacos de segunda o tercera línea, muchos de ellos no aprobados por la Food and Drug Administration. Es estos casos cobra vital importancia el seguimiento estricto, con especial cuidado en los efectos colaterales, que pueden ser nocivos para el desarrollo del paciente.


Psycho stimulants (PSE), mood stabilizers (ME) and benzodiazepines (BDZ) are psychotropic’s frequently used in children and adolescents psychiatry and their indication has increased considerably in the last year. The PSAE are used mainly in attentional deficits being first-line treatment in patients without co-morbidity. Modafinil and amphetamines are supposed to be equally effective and used with similar frequency in many countries, however there is evidence of bigger risk with amphetamines. Other drugs such as Atomoxetine, a-agonist, bupropion, tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine) are used as second or third line treatment. The ME are especially useful as treatment of bipolar disorder (BD); lithium, divalproex sodium and some atypical antipsychotics are considered first line treatment. Other ME that have showed effectiveness in TB are lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepina and topiramate. The BDZ haven´t been studied too much in young population, however its uses not uncommon. Although it is not a first line indication in anxiety disorders they are indicated as adjunctive treatment, especially diazepam. Fluracepam has a role in the treatment of insomnia in children over 15 years. While the treatment of choice for many pathologies of juvenile psychiatry is clear in several clinical guidelines, the therapeutic complexity of these patients often requires the use of psychopharmacology of 2nd or 3rd line, many of them not approved by the Food and Drug Administration in these cases is of vital importance a strict monitoring, with particular attention to side effects, which can be harmful to the patients development.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Child , Benzodiazepines , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Pharmacology, Clinical , Affect , Amphetamines , Lithium Carbonate
8.
RBCF, Rev. bras. ciênc. farm. (Impr.) ; 43(3): 335-346, jul.-set. 2007.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-468141

ABSTRACT

O estudo da dependência de substâncias psicoativas apresentou grandes avanços conceituais nas últimas décadas. A evolução dos conceitos foi paralela às evidências científicas que têm revelado os aspectos comportamentais e os mecanismos neurais envolvidos nesse fenômeno. Contudo, um grande desafio que permanece na pesquisa sobre a dependência de substâncias psicoativas é a identificação de quais fatores são responsáveis pela transição do uso controlado para o uso compulsivo. Está demonstrado que muitas variáveis interagem para influenciar a probabilidade de que qualquer indivíduo inicie o uso abusivo de substâncias psicoativas ou se torne dependente. Nos últimos anos, o estresse tem sido destacado como um fator importante na iniciação, manutenção e recaída da utilização de substâncias psicoativas. Neste trabalho analisamos os conceitos e teorias da farmacodependência e as principais evidências comportamentais pré-clínicas que demonstram a relação entre estresse e a vulnerabilidade ao abuso e dependência de psicoestimulantes.


The investigation of the mechanisms of drug abuse and addiction showed great advances in the last decades. New concepts emerged from the scientific evidences on behavioral and neural aspects of this phenomenon. However, the biggest challenge for the future is the identification of which risk factors are implicated in the transition from controlled to compulsive drug use. Stress has been pointed as an important factor related to initiation, maintenance and relapse to drug use. In the present paper we discuss the concepts and theories of drug addiction, and the main behavioral pre-clinical evidences showing the relationship between stress and psychostimulant addiction.


Subject(s)
Psychotropic Drugs , Substance-Related Disorders , Stress, Physiological
9.
J. bras. psiquiatr ; 56(supl.1): 53-56, 2007. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-465466

ABSTRACT

O tratamento farmacológico do transtorno do déficit de atenção com hiperatividade (TDAH) em adultos inclui o uso de psicoestimulantes, antidepressivos e atomoxetina, sendo o primeiro considerado a indicação de primeira escolha. A eficácia do metilfenidato foi demonstrada em adultos quando se empregavam doses maiores, proporcionalmente similares àquelas usadas em estudos em crianças. O perfil de eventos adversos do metilfenidato, incluindo aqueles relativos ao sistema cardiovascular, parece bastante seguro.


Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adulthood includes psychostimulants, antidepressants and atomoxetine, the first of them being considered the first choice. Methylphenidate efficacy has been demonstrated in adults when higher doses were used, in a proportionate similar way to what has been described in children. Methylphenidate profile of adverse events, including cardiovascular ones, seems to be safe.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Brazil , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL