ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to quantify tug-back by measuring the pulling force and investigate the correlation of clinical tug-back pulling force with in vitro gutta-percha (GP) cone adaptation score using micro-computed tomography (µCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight roots from human single-rooted teeth were divided into 2 groups. In the ProTaper Next (PTN) group, root canals were prepared with PTN, and in the ProFile (PF) group, root canals were prepared using PF (n = 14). The degree of tug-back was scored after selecting taper-matched GP cones. A novel method using a spring balance was designed to quantify the tug-back by measuring the pulling force. The correlation between tug-back scores, pulling force, and percentage of the gutta-percha occupied area (pGPOA) within apical 3 mm was investigated using µCT. The data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. RESULTS: Specimens with a strong tug-back had a mean pulling force of 1.24 N (range, 0.15–1.70 N). This study showed a positive correlation between tug-back score, pulling force, and pGPOA. However, there was no significant difference in these factors between the PTN and PF groups. Regardless of the groups, pGPOA and pulling force were significantly higher in the specimens with a higher tug-back score (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of subjective tug-back was a definitive determinant for master cone adaptation in the root canal. The use of the tug-back scoring system and pulling force allows the interpretation of subjective tug-back in a more objective and quantitative manner.
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Pulp Cavity , Gutta-Percha , In Vitro Techniques , Methods , Root Canal Obturation , Tooth , X-Ray MicrotomographyABSTRACT
O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a reprodutibilidade dos parâmetros biomecânicos da curva força-tempo do estilo "Crawl" em um protocolo de 10 s no nado atado. Dezesseis nadadores do sexo masculino (idade: 20,4 ± 4,0 anos; tempo na prova de 100 m livre: 53,68 ± 0,99 s) realizaram dois esforços máximos de 10 s no nado atado. Os parâmetros força pico, força média, taxa de desenvolvimento de força, impulso, duração da braçada, tempo para atingir a força pico e força mínima foram representados pela média de oito braçadas consecutivas obtidas em cada tentativa. Utilizou-se o teste t para observar as diferenças entre os esforços para cada parâmetro. O nível de significância estabelecido foi de 5%. A reprodutibilidade relativa foi medida pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson e a consistência entre as duas tentativas pelo coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). A reprodutibilidade absoluta foi verificada pelo coeficiente de variação (CV). Não foi demonstrada diferença estatisticamente significante para nenhum parâmetro biomecânico quando comparados os dois esforços. Os elevados CCI e baixos CV indicaram alta consistência interna dos parâmetros analisados. Conclui-se que os parâmetros biomecânicos analisados a partir do nado atado são reprodutíveis quando empregado protocolo de curta duração o que demonstra a possibilidade de utilização do protocolo com alto grau de confiabilidade, por parte de treinadores e atletas.
The aim of the present study was to analyze the reliability of biomechanical parameters of the front-Crawl's force-time curve in a 10-s protocol. Sixteen national competitive male swimmers (20.4 ± 4.0 years; 100-m best time: 53.68 ± 0.99 s) performed two 10-s maximal efforts in tethered swimming. Peak force, average force, impulse, rate of force development, stroke duration, time to peak force and minimum force were represented by the mean of eight consecutive strokes obtained in each trial. The paired student-t test was used to verify differences between trials for each biomechanical parameter. The significance level adopted was 5%. Relative reliability was tested by Pearson correlation coefficient and the consistency between trials by means of intraclass coefficient (CCI). The coefficient of variation was used to verify the absolute reliability. No significant differences between the trials to any biomechanical parameter were found. High CCI values and low CV values revealed the high internal consistency of the analyzed variables. It can be concluded that the biomechanical parameters regarding the tethered swimming are reliable in short duration protocols and may be used by coaches and athletes for monitoring training.