ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effects on extravascular lung water of lung protective ventilation strategy applying on piglets with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by paraquat (PQ) under pulse indicating continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring. Methods: The piglets models with ARDS induced by PQ were established in June 2020 and all of them were received mechanical ventilation and divided into three groups according to tidal volume (V(T)) : small V(T) group (6 ml/kg) , middle V(T) group (10 ml/kg) and large V(T) group (15 ml/kg) , there were 5 piglets in each group. The positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) were all setup on 10 cmH(2)O. The indexes such as arterial blood gas analysis, oxygenation index (OI) , extravascular lung water index (ELWI) and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) were monitored at time of before the model was established (baseline) , time of the model was established (t(0)) and 2 h (t(2)) , 4 h (t(4)) , 6 h (t(6)) after mechanical ventilation. Lung tissue were punctured at time of baseline, t(0) and t(6) to be stained by Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and pulmonary pathology were observed under light microscopy. Results: The heart rate (HR) , mean arterial pressure (MAP) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) of all groups were higher than the base value while the pH values, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) and OI were lower than the base value when the models were established (P<0.05) . After mechanical ventilation, the HR and MAP values of all groups at t(2), t(4) and t(6) were lower than t(0) while the PaCO(2) of t(4) and t(6) were all higher than t(0), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) . The PaO(2) and OI of all groups showed a trend of rising at first and then decreasing after mechanical ventilation. The MAP, PaO(2), PaCO(2) and OI of the middle V(T) group and large V(T) group were apparently lower than that of the small V(T) group at t(2), t(4) and t(6) (P<0.05) . The ELWI and PVPI at t(0) of all groups were higher than that of baseline (P<0.05) . The ELWI of the small V(T) group at t(6) were lower than t(0) of the same group and t(6) of the middle V(T) group and large V(T) group (P<0.05) . HE staining showed congestion and edema of alveolar tissue, swelling of capillaries, exudation of red blood cells and widening of alveolar septum in piglets after successful modeling. And further widening of alveolar septum and rupture of alveolar septum could be seen in the lung tissues of each group at t(6), and the injury was the slightest in the small V(T) group. Conclusion: The lung protective ventilation strategy can alleviate the extravascular lung water and ARDS induced by PQ and improve oxygenation.
Subject(s)
Animals , Extravascular Lung Water , Lung/physiology , Paraquat/toxicity , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/chemically induced , SwineABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the difference and correlation between continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitor on determination of hemodynamic parameters in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, and to assess the feasibility of non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamics with CNAP. Methods A prospective observation self-control study was conducted. The critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation who needed hemodynamics monitoring, and admitted to the fourth department of intensive care unit (ICU) of Fujian Provincial Hospital from June 2018 to March 2019 were enrolled. PiCCO catheter were inserted immediately after admission, the hemodynamic indexes were measured by thermodilution method, and mean arterial pressure (MAPPiCCO), cardiac index (CIPiCCO), pulse pressure variation rate (PPVPiCCO) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRIPiCCO) were obtained at 0 hour and 24 hours respectively. Meanwhile, the above indexes (MAPCNAP, CICNAP, PPVCNAP and SVRICNAP) were measured with CNAP. All measurements were repeated thrice and average values were reported. The differences in above parameters between the two methods were evaluated. Pearson test was used for the correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis method was used for consistency test. Results Thirty-eight patients were enrolled into this study. One patient died within 24 hours was excluded, 2 patients were excluded due to withdrawing treatment within 24 hours, 2 patients were excluded because of atrial fibrillation, and 1 patient's data was lost due to technical problems. Thus, data from 32 patients were available for final analysis. There were 12 females and 20 males, aging 26-84 years old with the mean of (66.8±19.1) years old, body mass index (BMI) of (23.7±3.9) kg/m2, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score of 19.5±5.3, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of 9.7±4.1. There were no significant differences in CI or PPV between CNAP and PiCCO groups [CI (mL·s-1·m-2): 59.8±12.6 vs. 58.5±14.2, PPV: (14.7±6.8)% vs. (14.0±6.8)%, both P > 0.05]. MAP and SVRI measured by CNAP were significantly higher than those measured by PiCCO [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):65.6±9.4 vs. 60.1±9.2, SVRI (kPa·s·L-1·m-2): 206.2±53.9 vs. 179.5±57.8, both P < 0.01]. The correlation analysis showed that MAP, CI, PPV and SVRI measured by the two methods were significantly positively correlated (r value was 0.624, 0.864, 0.835 and 0.655 respectively, all P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that CNAP and PiCCO had a good consistency for the measurement of CI and PPV, the average differences were 1.2 mL·s-1·m-2 and 0.5% respectively, while the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were -12.8-15.3 mL·s-1·m-2 and -7.1%-8.2% respectively. However, the consistency of MAP and SVRI measured by those two methods was poor, the average differences were 5.5 mmHg and 26.8 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively, while the 95%CI was -10.4-21.3 mmHg and -64.5-118.0 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively. Conclusion CNAP was comparable with PiCCO when monitoring CI and PPV in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients; while the results of MAP and SVRI might be inaccurate, which should be interpreted correctly and carefully.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the difference and correlation between continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitor on determination of hemodynamic parameters in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, and to assess the feasibility of non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamics with CNAP. Methods A prospective observation self-control study was conducted. The critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation who needed hemodynamics monitoring, and admitted to the fourth department of intensive care unit (ICU) of Fujian Provincial Hospital from June 2018 to March 2019 were enrolled. PiCCO catheter were inserted immediately after admission, the hemodynamic indexes were measured by thermodilution method, and mean arterial pressure (MAPPiCCO), cardiac index (CIPiCCO), pulse pressure variation rate (PPVPiCCO) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRIPiCCO) were obtained at 0 hour and 24 hours respectively. Meanwhile, the above indexes (MAPCNAP, CICNAP, PPVCNAP and SVRICNAP) were measured with CNAP. All measurements were repeated thrice and average values were reported. The differences in above parameters between the two methods were evaluated. Pearson test was used for the correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis method was used for consistency test. Results Thirty-eight patients were enrolled into this study. One patient died within 24 hours was excluded, 2 patients were excluded due to withdrawing treatment within 24 hours, 2 patients were excluded because of atrial fibrillation, and 1 patient's data was lost due to technical problems. Thus, data from 32 patients were available for final analysis. There were 12 females and 20 males, aging 26-84 years old with the mean of (66.8±19.1) years old, body mass index (BMI) of (23.7±3.9) kg/m2, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score of 19.5±5.3, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of 9.7±4.1. There were no significant differences in CI or PPV between CNAP and PiCCO groups [CI (mL·s-1·m-2): 59.8±12.6 vs. 58.5±14.2, PPV: (14.7±6.8)% vs. (14.0±6.8)%, both P > 0.05]. MAP and SVRI measured by CNAP were significantly higher than those measured by PiCCO [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):65.6±9.4 vs. 60.1±9.2, SVRI (kPa·s·L-1·m-2): 206.2±53.9 vs. 179.5±57.8, both P < 0.01]. The correlation analysis showed that MAP, CI, PPV and SVRI measured by the two methods were significantly positively correlated (r value was 0.624, 0.864, 0.835 and 0.655 respectively, all P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that CNAP and PiCCO had a good consistency for the measurement of CI and PPV, the average differences were 1.2 mL·s-1·m-2 and 0.5% respectively, while the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were -12.8-15.3 mL·s-1·m-2 and -7.1%-8.2% respectively. However, the consistency of MAP and SVRI measured by those two methods was poor, the average differences were 5.5 mmHg and 26.8 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively, while the 95%CI was -10.4-21.3 mmHg and -64.5-118.0 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively. Conclusion CNAP was comparable with PiCCO when monitoring CI and PPV in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients; while the results of MAP and SVRI might be inaccurate, which should be interpreted correctly and carefully.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the difference and correlation between continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitor on determination of hemodynamic parameters in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, and to assess the feasibility of non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamics with CNAP.@*Methods@#A prospective observation self-control study was conducted.The critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation who needed hemodynamics monitoring, and admitted to the fourth department of intensive care unit (ICU) of Fujian Provincial Hospital from June 2018 to March 2019 were enrolled. PiCCO catheter were inserted immediately after admission, the hemodynamic indexes were measured by thermodilution method, and mean arterial pressure (MAPPiCCO), cardiac index (CIPiCCO), pulse pressure variation rate (PPVPiCCO) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRIPiCCO) were obtained at 0 hour and 24 hours respectively. Meanwhile, the above indexes (MAPCNAP, CICNAP, PPVCNAP and SVRICNAP) were measured with CNAP. All measurements were repeated thrice and average values were reported. The differences in above parameters between the two methods were evaluated. Pearson test was used for the correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis method was used for consistency test.@*Results@#Thirty-eight patients were enrolled into this study. One patient died within 24 hours was excluded, 2 patients were excluded due to withdrawing treatment within 24 hours, 2 patients were excluded because of atrial fibrillation, and 1 patient's data was lost due to technical problems. Thus, data from 32 patients were available for final analysis. There were 12 females and 20 males, aging 26-84 years old with the mean of (66.8±19.1) years old, body mass index (BMI) of (23.7±3.9) kg/m2, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score of 19.5±5.3, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of 9.7±4.1. There were no significant differences in CI or PPV between CNAP and PiCCO groups [CI (mL·s-1·m-2): 59.8±12.6 vs. 58.5±14.2, PPV: (14.7±6.8)% vs. (14.0±6.8)%, both P > 0.05]. MAP and SVRI measured by CNAP were significantly higher than those measured by PiCCO [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 65.6±9.4 vs. 60.1±9.2, SVRI (kPa·s·L-1·m-2): 206.2±53.9 vs. 179.5±57.8, both P < 0.01]. The correlation analysis showed that MAP, CI, PPV and SVRI measured by the two methods were significantly positively correlated (r value was 0.624, 0.864, 0.835 and 0.655 respectively, all P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that CNAP and PiCCO had a good consistency for the measurement of CI and PPV, the average differences were 1.2 mL·s-1·m-2 and 0.5% respectively, while the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were -12.8-15.3 mL·s-1·m-2 and -7.1%-8.2% respectively. However, the consistency of MAP and SVRI measured by those two methods was poor, the average differences were 5.5 mmHg and 26.8 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively, while the 95%CI was -10.4-21.3 mmHg and -64.5-118.0 kPa·s·L-1·m-2 respectively.@*Conclusion@#CNAP was comparable with PiCCO when monitoring CI and PPV in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients; while the results of MAP and SVRI might be inaccurate, which should be interpreted correctly and carefully.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the difference and correlation between ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitor on determination of hemodynamic parameters in critical patients.Methods A prospective observation self-control study was conducted.The critical patients who need hemodynamics monitoring,and admitted to Department of Critical Care Medicine of Peking University People's Hospital from March 2013 to December 2015 were enrolled.Cardiac output (CO),cardiac index (CI),stroke volume (SV),and stroke index (SI) were determined by PiCCO using thermodilution method at immediately (0 hour) and 24 hours after successful location of PiCCO catheter for 3 times then the above indexes were measured with USCOM,and the average values were chosen for statistical analysis.The differences in above parameters between the two methods,and the correlation of the parameters monitored by two methods were evaluated by Pearson linear correlation method,the consistency test was conducted by Bland-Altman method.Results In 31 critical patients enrolled,there were 18 males and 13 females,aging 29-89 years old with the mean of (48.1 ± 36.3) years,body mass of (68.7 ± 17.5) kg,and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score of 21.2 ± 3.1.CO,CI,SV,and SI detected by USCOM were significantly higher than those detected by PiCCO [CO (L/min):6.32 ± 1.98 vs.5.86 ± 1.72,t =4.887,P =0.000;CI (mL· s-1· m-2):61.68 ± 20.17 vs.56.84± 17.34,t =5.189,P =0.000;SV (mL):61.9 ± 19.7 vs.57.0± 16.9,t =3.977,P =0.000;SI (mL/m2):36.84 ± 12.67 vs.33.33 ± 10.79,t =4.278,P =0.000].It was shown by correlation analysis that CO,CI,SV,and SI monitored by USCOM and PiCCO was positively correlated (R2 value was 0.795,0.798,0.837,and 0.827,respectively,all P =0.000).It was shown by Bland-Altman analysis that the mean CO change (ΔCO) from 0 hour to 24 hours was 0.1 L/min,and the 95％ confidence interval was-0.62 to 0.80.Conclusion There was significant difference in the comparison of hemodynamics parameters monitored by USCOM and PiCCO respectively in critical patients,the overall values monitored by USCOM were higher than those monitored by PiCCO monitoring,but the correlations were good.