ABSTRACT
Objective To comparison of clinical efficacy between mini-invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion(mis-TLIF) assisted by Quadrant system and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)treatment for lumber spondylolisthesis,to find a better treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods A total of 65 cases who were under lumber spondylolisthesis were retrospectively selected from our hospital,26 cases in mini-invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted by Quadrant system (mis-TLIF group).39 cases in open posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF group).Record the incision length,intraoperative blood loss,opertive time,bed time,hospital time,pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) score were recorded respectively.After surgery,the imaging(X-Ray) evalute the vertebral fusion status.Results There were no significant difference between mis-TLIF group and PLIF group in BMI [(22.77 ± 4.38) kg/m2 and (21.28 ± 5.24) kg/m2],preoperative VAS score [(6.46 ± 1.67) and (6.59 ± 1.56)],preoperative ODI score [(58.70 ± 7.19) ％ and (60.10 ± 9.56) ％] (all P ＞ 0.05).There were significant difference between two groups in incision length [(6.10 ± 0.95) cm and (11.12 ± 2.02) cm],intraoperative blood loss [(247.31 ± 36.72) ml and (340.51 ± 64.32) ml],opertive time[(179.96 ± 17.54) min and(151.85 ± 16.06) min],bed time[(3.62 ± 1.44) d and (4.98 ± 1.74) d],hospital time [(9.38 ± 2.60) d and (11.95 ± 3.61) d] (all P ＜ 0.05).Postoperatively VAS score was assesssd at 1 month [(3.15 ± 1.08]),3months [(1.58 ± 0.81)],6months [(1.08 ± 0.74)] and ODI score was(30.77 ± 6.45) ％,(25.54 ± 6.33) ％,(20.23 ± 7.05) ％,respectively in mis-TLIF group were lower than those of PLIF group (P ＜ 0.05).There were no significant difference between two groups in the fusion rate in 3 months,6 months after operation.Conclusion Mis-TLIF had a lot of advantages relative to PLIF in the treatment of lumber spondylolisthesis,be like less trauma,less bleeding,less hospital time,quick rehabilitation and good curative effect,provide a new minimally invasive method for lumber spondylolisthesis patient.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of unilateral small incision Quadrant channel assisted MIS?TLIF unilateral pedicle screw fixation system in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods From January 2011 to December 2013,a total of 56 cases with low back and leg pain were selected in the People′s Hospital of Dongguan,including 25 cases with lumbar disc herniation,18 cases with lumbar tube stenosis,10 cases with discogenic low back pain,2 cases of recurrence after posterior lumbar spine surgery,1 case of recurrence after transforaminal endoscopic surgery. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation was performed in the treatment of MIS?TLIF with expandable pipeline system. VAS and Oswestry dysfunction index scoring system( ODI) were used to evaluate of pain and functional recovery in patients with preoperative and postoperative pain and functional recovery,the Suk method was used to observe the bone graft fusion. Results There were 5 cases of non operative side waist back pain after operation,and the waist circumference and anti?inflammatory pain relief were improved after treatment. One case of postoperative subcutaneous fat liquefaction, was cured by dressing change. One patient with recurrence of MED intraoperatie cerebrospinal fluid leakage,was cured after treatment by the bed,dehydration and others. Other complications such as infection,screw loosening, nerve root injury and other complications had no found. After 1 month,the VAS score from preoperative ( 6. 82 ±0. 92) points fell to (1. 95±0. 55) points,ODI score from preoperative (35. 21±2. 73) points fell to (10. 05 ±1. 72) points, significantly improved compared with the preoperative, the differences were statistically significant( t=36. 775,65. 858,P<0. 05) ,based on the fusion of Suk judgment method,2 cases of patients with possible fusion,the rest were fusion. Conclusion Unilateral small incision under the quadrant assisted MIS?TILF unilateral pedicle nail stick system has obvious advantages in treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease,as long as we choose to suitable cases and most patients can obtain satisfactory results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:There are stil about 10%-30%of patients presenting no obvious improvement of symptoms after lumbar disc herniation surgery, which are col ectively known as the lumbar spine post-surgery failure syndrome, and lumbar instability is one of the important reasons. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of surgery including posterior lumbar spinal canal decompression, intervertebral disc resection, lumbar interbody fusion, and pedicle screw fixation on lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion concurring lumbar instability via MAST Quadrant retractor. METHODS:From December 2011 to October 2012, 62 cases of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion concurring lumbar instability were treated with posterior lumbar spinal canal decompression, intervertebral disc resection, lumbar interbody fusion, and pedicle screw fixation via MAST Quadrant retractor. There were 38 female and 24 male ranging in age from 37 to 69 years (average 53.7 years). After operation, al patients were fol owed-up to evaluate the effect of the treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The operative time was 90-210 minutes, average 145 minutes, and the amount of blood loss was 50-300 mL, average 120 mL. The hospitalization time was 5-9 days, average 6 days. Al incisions healed by first intention. Al patients were fol owed up 7.2 months on average (from 3 to 10 months). The preoperative JOA score was (10.25±2.34) points. The postoperative JOA score decreased to (18.31±3.12) points at the fol ow-up after 1 month and (25.35±2.61) points at the last fol ow-up, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (P<0.01). The preoperative VAS score was (8.24±1.15) points. The postoperative VAS score decreased to (2.97±1.12) points after 1 month and (1.13±0.39) points at the last fol ow-up, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (P<0.01). According to reforming Macnab standard, the results were excel ent in 53 cases and good in 9 cases at the last fol ow-up. The surgery including posterior lumbar spinal canal decompression, intervertebral disc resection, lumbar interbody fusion, and pedicle screw fixation via MAST Quadrant retractor is a safe, effective and minimal y invasive surgical technique in treating lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion concurring lumbar instability.